Week 5 Student Discussion - Work Standards

Status
Not open for further replies.

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#1
Chapter 10 (Human Resources) brings in issues of standardized work practices (such as the story about UPS on page 315, where workers have a very proscriptive method as to how to stop the truck and make a delivery) and work standards (it should take a worker X minutes to do this task).

Certainly such information is usefull to Operations Management, but how can we make good use of this information, without the downsides of "managing by numbers" and running into the problems with Dr. Deming's 14 Points?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

Jamie Morris

#2
Steve Prevette said:
Chapter 10 (Human Resources) brings in issues of standardized work practices (such as the story about UPS on page 315, where workers have a very proscriptive method as to how to stop the truck and make a delivery) and work standards (it should take a worker X minutes to do this task).

Certainly such information is usefull to Operations Management, but how can we make good use of this information, without the downsides of "managing by numbers" and running into the problems with Dr. Deming's 14 Points?
Using numbers and statistical process control methodolgies to manage, adjust, and improve our processes and systems is certainly a very good use of operations management tools. However, if we use numbers, unrealistic goals, objectives, etc. to control, adjust, micromanage the workers, we have missed the point, and we will achieve average performing organizations, at best.

Power Plants have very prescriptive controls, limits, and procedural processes to control their systems and equipment. Some may say that this is management by numbers, however, these controlling limits are based on extensive design specifications and safety analysis, and they ensure safe operation of the plant.

In the Red Bead experiment, much emphasis was placed on management by numbers and goals related to defect reduction. However, the numbers that were being monitored and tracked were related to worker performance versus system/process performance. As Scholtes describes in his book, the Leaders Handbook, managers must have a full understanding of the system, must understand the common cause variation that is inherent to the system, and must be able to identify special cause variation in the system. This knowledge is required to be able monitor (numbers and data), to make adjustments to the system, and to improve the system and thus the organization.
 
R

Roberta

#3
Week 5

The numbers that are associated with a certain task or subset of tasks are useful for planning purposes, and yet consideration must be given that numbers do fluctuate due to unforeseen circumstances. For instance with the UPS driver, the amount of time that it takes for the driver to stop the truck and make the delivery/pick up will be varied due to the road and sidewalk conditions, the size and number of packages, if there is a vicious dog on the way to the residence, or a number of any other factors of the process. The weather and physical obstacles are out of the control of the employee and therefore it would be unreasonable to require the optimum delivery time to met each time. However, in planning it can be considered that a delivery will take "x" number of minutes, but milestone goals, such as getting packages to the airport in time for air shipment, need to accomodate a reasonable number of those circumstances in order for the major milestones to be met consistently on time and within budget. Involving the staff (in this case the drivers) in the planning activities would bring reality into the numbers and allow for consensus on the plan from the start.
 
M

Mary Davenport

#4
In the world of project controls the numbers are everything. It is impossible to know where you are and how to proceed unless you know how numbers are affecting you. Plans are based on average number of manhours required to perform specific work, costs are forecast based on labor hours/dollars, and expected material costs. Performance is measured based on actual costs vs planned vs value for the dollar.

Knowing all of that is critical to a project manager, but worthless to the craftsman on the job. Management must use other factors to educate and motivate the people doing the work. Beating people over the head with numbers does not motivate them to perform better, but giving them a sense of accomplishment, helping employees take pride in their work, and demonstrating how their tasks fit into overall company success can provide many benefits for the company.
 
M

mark child

#5
I agree that numbers and specific instructions are good. However, holding people to attaining these numbers and instructions by the letter is nearly impossible. With endless numbers of uncontrolled variables floating around we as managers cannot expect perfect results every time. Therefore maintaining numbers and specific instructions as guidelines or benchmarks make much more sense. In this line of thinking emplyees will push themselves to maintain the standard or go above it. People generally do not set out to perform poorly.
 
D

dwall

#6
I agree with Mary. The use of Benchmarks for particular tasks is important for planning purposes but to use the benchmarks to evaluate performance appears to relegate managerial responsibility to some predetermined algorithm. This to me is a very lazy way to manage employees and is detrimental to any kind of employees' quality of worklife. Management must be involved with the dynamics of the work place and monitor mission completion with the understanding that uncontrollable events have as much impact on the final process completion in a timely manner as the employees' performance of the tasks. Today many managers discuss process improvements in one breath and evaluate employee performance based on some ideal process. By removing the flexibility from the process (i.e.; it takes 6 minutes to complete this task) we are seriously limiting the chance for process improvements because we are not acknowledging that there is any room for alternate times. In this way, management may never learn of root causes for additional times nor will they be able to correct root causes and improve established times for specific tasks.
 

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#7
Good! At least you sense the basic flaw in what is often termed "Management By Objective" (MBO) when the human is measured against an algorithm and the human is replaced or retooled instead of the process.
 
S

ssagreen

#8
On the UPS analogy. There is nothing wrong with UPS saying that this is the best way that our experience has shown us to perform the task of delivering packages. I am sure that they have done enough deliveries to understand about how long it will take and probably the "best" way to do it. As long as they give employees allowances on time and the ability to improve the system there is nothing wrong with training the employees with best known way of doing things and letting them know of the company's expectations for them. UPS has a strong corporate culture and their employees stay with the company for years with very low driver turnover. They seem to be doing very well.

A competitor of theirs, FedEx, is exactly opposite of them on how they treat their drivers. A FedEx driver is an independent contractor that gets alot less training, corporate indoctorination, and a whole lot more freedom to do it their own way. FedEx also seems to be very successful. So which is the better way?
 
J

jlowens

#9
Work Standards

I agree with Mark. When I was a teenager, I worked for Jack-In-The Box. The manager would sit outside the restaurant and time how long it took for us to get an order out. What wasn't taken into affect were the outside variables that could slow an order down or ways to speed up an order. Tools weren't given us to increase production. As a manager we know better. now The red bead experient has shown us that. We have to realize that it's more than just a number's game. I think numbers are important and needed but they must be realistic numbers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Scope of Facility - Our auditor asked us last week for our "Scope of the Facility" AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 12
Q Audit 1 week away and no agenda from auditor yet IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
Marc A Four Day Work Week - Reuters - Dec 2018 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 7
S Design changes a week after regulatory submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Interview Presentation for Quality Engineer Role Next Week! Career and Occupation Discussions 21
E Irritation test - Dermal Filler - 52-week implantation study EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Marc Adventures in Design Quality Assurance - Two-week-old Pixel 2 XL displays World News 0
W DCMA and AS9100C - Dedicating a week and 5 auditors to perform a AS9100C audit AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 7
B Anyone Attending OTC next week in Houston? (Offshore Technology Confernce) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
Hershal This week in the High Desert Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 14
R Two Week Notice Backlash Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 17
Mikishots What a week - 15 November 2013 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
Claes Gefvenberg IMS (Integrated Management System) Audited for a week... Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 10
B The Case for a 25-Hour Work Week Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
Q Last work week due to immigration process, I'm feeling overwhelmed. Immigration and Expatriate Topics 7
P Suggestions for Europe in a Week - By Car Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 4
chris1price The final version of the RoHS2 recast was published last week as 2011/65/EU RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 8
S World Quality Week - PRI Articles AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
T It is Audit Week... August 2010 General Auditing Discussions 31
BradM NCSLI this upcoming week! Who will be there? July 2010 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
somashekar Information sharing: Week 27, 2010 (HEAT TREATMENT) The Reading Room 3
somashekar Information sharing: Week 24, 2010 (INDUCTION MOTOR) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 22, 2010 (HARDNESS, THREADS, BEARINGS) The Reading Room 3
somashekar Information sharing: Week 22, 2010 (TPM, OEE) The Reading Room 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (PAPER SIZES) The Reading Room 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (COMPUTER TERMS, NUMBER SYSTEM AND DIGITAL) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (CAPACITORS, TRANSFORMERS, RELAYS) The Reading Room 2
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (LEADACID BATTERY AND 12V ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (MOTORS, MACHINES AND LUBRICATION) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Definition Is today (21 May, 2010) in week # 20 or 21 ? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 20, 2010 (DG set and SYNCHRONIZATION) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (ELECTRICITY, SAFETY & GROUNDING) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (SOLAR ENERGY) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (ENERGY) The Reading Room 0
xcanals_tecno-med.es MDD 93/42 as amended by dir 2007/47 in force next week (21 mars) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
H Elsmar Quote of the Week Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 5
N Ideas for Quality Week Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 18
Claes Gefvenberg Picture of the week Imported Legacy Blogs 1
Claes Gefvenberg Picture of the week Imported Legacy Blogs 0
T How many hours a week do you devote to maintaining your QMS? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
Claes Gefvenberg Another week, another picture... Imported Legacy Blogs 2
Hershal NCSLI this upcoming week! Who will be there?-2009 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
J FAA Training suggestions wanted for Sept 1st week Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
S Wish me luck - whole week Nadcap audit... AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 10
bobdoering GM prepares to announce Pontiac closure next week Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
M Sampling Method for 25 pieces a week of a cable with connectors Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
Howard Atkins What calender week is it? ISO 8601 is not clear Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
B Audit Week Is Finally Here Imported Legacy Blogs 2
C Continuous Improvement Toons wanted for Continuous Improvement Awareness Week Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 2
H I have an interview with LRQA next week - Your advice or experiences? Career and Occupation Discussions 8
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom