SBS - The best value in QMS software

What are the points to be discussed in a Management Review Meeting (MRM)

Elsmar Forum Sponsor
P

PE-2011

#13
Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

Hello,

Soliciting good suggestions - like what is the method you people are using to evaluate training effectiveness.

Method to comply "competence".

Regards
Maheswari
 

qusys

Trusted Information Resource
#14
Re: Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

Hello,

Soliciting good suggestions - like what is the method you people are using to evaluate training effectiveness.

Method to comply "competence".

Regards
Maheswari
There are several options, it depends.
For instance, you can evaluate the competence with a written test to the trainee in the phase pre-training and post-training ( in case of a class training), or if he /she obtain a certification/diploma with an external training provider.
In second instance, you can evaluate it in the performance evaluation of a resource, if he/she reaches the planned results and so he/she shows competence in what he/she is supposed to do as per job assignements.
In case of a training on the job ( on the production field), the supervisor can control how the trainee performs the job after a planned period of formation with a certificated peer of the same workstation.
Hope this helps:bigwave:
 
P

PE-2011

#15
Re: Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

there was a case sometime back.

ISO 9001 6.2.2 a) says "determine the necessary competence for personnel performing work affecting conformity to product requirements". Now the question is who will determine? Concerned person from Human Resources department? or the employees himself? or reporting authority of particular employee?

clause e) says "maintain appropriate records of education, training, skills and experience". Problem was - HR department implemented online manpower request system where education, basic skills, experience was showing, but was not very proper. HR argued, they cannot maintain such matrix because standard asking continual improvement and according the market growth, the required skills will grow for each and every requirement. Then it should be filled by concerned reporting authority every time. Is it correct? Is this sufficient to fulfill this clause?
 

qusys

Trusted Information Resource
#16
Re: Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

there was a case sometime back.

ISO 9001 6.2.2 a) says "determine the necessary competence for personnel performing work affecting conformity to product requirements". Now the question is who will determine? Concerned person from Human Resources department? or the employees himself? or reporting authority of particular employee?

clause e) says "maintain appropriate records of education, training, skills and experience". Problem was - HR department implemented online manpower request system where education, basic skills, experience was showing, but was not very proper. HR argued, they cannot maintain such matrix because standard asking continual improvement and according the market growth, the required skills will grow for each and every requirement. Then it should be filled by concerned reporting authority every time. Is it correct? Is this sufficient to fulfill this clause?
Q1: You should apply a process approach in designing training process with roles, responsibilities, procedures, KPI, tools and linked/support process. From what I have seen in some organizations I visited, the supervisor has the responsibility to make a training program for his/her collaborators , based upon the needs and the expectations of the professional roles of the reporting people. On the other hand, HR should set the policy and issues procedures to facilitate the process.

Q2: ISO 9001 issues requirements that each organzation can fullfil in different ways. What you ask is related to the design of the training process. I think that a ( automatic) tool is important for the process, but first of all you shall determine the process itself. Tool is instrumental to the effectiveness of the process, but it should not drive it. I think you shall make some fine tunings to the process, establishing the clear responsibilities for the several activities:bigwave:
 
Last edited:

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#17
Re: Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

there was a case sometime back.

ISO 9001 6.2.2 a) says "determine the necessary competence for personnel performing work affecting conformity to product requirements". Now the question is who will determine? Concerned person from Human Resources department? or the employees himself? or reporting authority of particular employee?

clause e) says "maintain appropriate records of education, training, skills and experience". Problem was - HR department implemented online manpower request system where education, basic skills, experience was showing, but was not very proper. HR argued, they cannot maintain such matrix because standard asking continual improvement and according the market growth, the required skills will grow for each and every requirement. Then it should be filled by concerned reporting authority every time. Is it correct? Is this sufficient to fulfill this clause?
Training is a planned activity to bridge the gap between have and need. These needs can be of the present or future requirements. In both the cases someone above in the organization who knows the requirement and knows what they have will plan for the bridging of the gap by means of some training or other means of their human resource.
So the one who determines the effectiveness will be the one who determines the gap and takes steps to bridge the gaps.
But the personnel who undertake the training are also capable of evaluating the effectiveness of the training taken up. This is the immediate effectiveness or also called as training feedback which the nominated personnel for a training can provide. The real effectiveness will come from the performance noticed and assessed by the responsible manager over time. Both together will form the effectiveness.
There are several methods adopted for this and one that suits the organization best can be adopted.
HR as a functional department can at best facilitate this process and maintain records, however the various functional heads or responsible managers are the persons who have to plan training and provide training (HR can facilitate) and evaluate the effectiveness of the training provided.
 
Last edited:

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#18
Dear Mr.Somashekar,

Thanks. Please see quote of Stevek. As a quality manager he is chairing the MRM. Similar way MR can chair the MRM. is it? MD can also chair the MRM?
All these meetings and stuff springs up from a mindset that management review records must be management review meeting minutes. From this springs up the thought that management review meetings must be held periodically, and from this .... someone has to be chair person.
This is not the requirement.
Management review must be an ongoing affair and several types of quality management system MIS reporting must be in place in order to get the QMS performance measure and on a broader scale the organizational performance measure. These must be having good links to show continuity of performance measures.
The standard lets us know those specific areas which when reviewed and decisions , actions taken., determine the health of the QMS and an organization can review stuff much more than what is stated in the standard.
Trust me, those who maintain management review meetings minutes (MRM minutes) as management review records neither really have meetings conducted nor any discussions over it.
 
S

samsung

#19
Re: Competence, Training and awareness - ISO 9001 clause No.6.2.2

there was a case sometime back.

ISO 9001 6.2.2 a) says "determine the necessary competence for personnel performing work affecting conformity to product requirements". Now the question is who will determine? Concerned person from Human Resources department? or the employees himself? or reporting authority of particular employee?
In my opinion, HR has nothing to do with determining people's competence (except for their own staff). It's not their job. Another point is - competence needs to be determined and evaluated only for the "personnel performing work affecting conformity to product requirements" and only by the one who:
- actually hired or created the requirement for hiring the personnel
- understands the job being done or role being played
- has set some performance measurement criteria to measure the competence against and the one who
- monitors the performance of the personnel under evaluation

HR department has certain different jobs to do. Examples are - pre & post recruitment activities, creating and maintaining employee database, coordinating for induction/awareness or need based trainings, maintaining training records and analysing the training feedback etc. In addition, they also help the process owners/ employees during the performance appraisal process, counsel employees on various matters and cater to their career advancement needs and the likes.

clause e) says "maintain appropriate records of education, training, skills and experience". Problem was - HR department implemented online manpower request system where education, basic skills, experience was showing, but was not very proper. HR argued, they cannot maintain such matrix because standard asking continual improvement and according the market growth, the required skills will grow for each and every requirement. Then it should be filled by concerned reporting authority every time. Is it correct? Is this sufficient to fulfill this clause?
If HR maintains all the records pertaining to employees training, skill, education, experience etc,; I wonder why they can't keep the skill matrix updated no matter how fast the required skills may grow in size or number.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S OEM full range calibrations vs Validation special test points Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Bullet Points vs Numbered lists Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 11
Z Putting back excluded rows/data points in a control chart Using Minitab Software 0
Z Minitab - Updating Graph with specific data points Using Minitab Software 2
K Process Mapping - Inputs/Outputs/Detail Activities/Control points/Measurement? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4
D Lean and Elimination of QC Inspection Points in a New factory Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 9
M EU Basic UDI-DI Trigger Points - When is a new Basic UDI-DI required EU Medical Device Regulations 3
V Handling open points in design reviews 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
R Measurement - Center Points not taken into account Using Minitab Software 3
Marc Have you Lost some "Points"? (16 August 2018) Forum News and General Information 4
ScottK Dr. Deming's most neglected Points and Diseases Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 13
H How to define Root Cause when some points are out of control chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
R Understanding a few points on ISO 9001's Design and Development Planning ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
A Insights on Transactional Ticket Audits such Parameters, Weighting Points, etc ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
M Poka-yoke - Key Topics and Points Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 11
M SPC with many data points from one dimension Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 16
F Control Points in a combined BRCv6 and IFS v6 system Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 1
A Clean Test according to ISO 16232 - Some points Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
Q Number of Calibration Verification Points - Calipers, height gages, etc General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
M Supplier Nonconformances - Key Points to ask a Metal Stamping Supplier Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
E What are Theo Points in a checklist document for a TS16949 Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
S ANOVA/Regression - Analyzing a Dataset which contains over 4500 Points Using Minitab Software 3
BradM Covegratulations to BevD - 15,000 Karma points and a silver star Covegratulations 15
Sidney Vianna Covegratulations to Ajit Basrur - 15,000 Karma points and a silver star Covegratulations 22
Q Implementation of 8 or 9 Points Above/Below Centerline question Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
J Proper Amount of Data Points for Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 12
J Decision Tree using for CCP (Critical Control Points) Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
J Defining CCP (Critical Control Points) in a Rice Mill Plant Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 9
M Determining Critical Control Points (CCP's) in Food Safety Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
A Medical Device Electronic Systems Design - Points to be cleared EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S Advice for preparation of ADOA and POA audits - What are the most critical points? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
G Points to consider while defining the Quality Policy AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
H Determining the Correct Sample Size when AQL points to two Sample Sizes AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 7
B Having trouble writing a directive (procedure) that points to the right place ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
S Audit Points for Auditing a Welding Supplier General Auditing Discussions 14
Q How Demings Point 9 (of his 14 points) is related to the FDA QSR Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3
S Concise History of Quality ? Major breakthroughs, key turning points etc. Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
T Conducting the "are all points within the control limits" test when there is no LCL? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
Q How to Control Hold Points in Manufacturing? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Ron Rompen Assistance Needed in Calculation - How to extrapolate/calculate points on a curve Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
C Conclusions from weird GR&R (Gage R&R) Results - 9 of 12 points have NDC of 1 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
M What are the strong points of Fraction Nonconforming vs. Cpk Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
R Accounting for (Symbols for) Data Collection Points in Process Maps Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
K How to establish critical limit for Critical Control Points (CCPs) Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 7
C Dial Bore Gage Contact Points leaving witness/burnish marks General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
B Color Individual Points on a Control Chart? Using Minitab Software 7
P Help on Treatment of Points Outside of Control Limits Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
Marc Heads Up! Win7 Can Delete All System Restore Points On Reboot After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
P Check Fixture Costs - Simple check fixture (go/no go) that checks 3-4 points Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
A P & F value in Minitab Statistical Studies (SPC) and the 8 points rule Using Minitab Software 7

Similar threads

Top Bottom