E
ElmerF
Hello,
I have a question with regard to the level of validation required from vendors. My understanding of validation is you either 100% inspect or you validate.
With off the shelf items from vendors, they are not likely to supply a validation of their process. Is it sufficient that they provide a COC saying that their product meets their specification. What incoming ispection must be conducted thereafter. Is an AQL depending on criticality sufficient? Typically Z1.4 or Z1.9 as applicable?
What about a component made to our specification? Must we get an IQ, OQ, PQ from the vendor or have them conduct 100% inspection or is an AQL sufficient? Will a COC suffice in place of a validation? If in turn that vendor receives a sub-component from a sub-supplier do they need to do the same (validate or 100% inspect) and are we responsible for ensuring our vendor has completed this or again rely on their certification (COC).
Thanks for the help.
Elmer
I have a question with regard to the level of validation required from vendors. My understanding of validation is you either 100% inspect or you validate.
With off the shelf items from vendors, they are not likely to supply a validation of their process. Is it sufficient that they provide a COC saying that their product meets their specification. What incoming ispection must be conducted thereafter. Is an AQL depending on criticality sufficient? Typically Z1.4 or Z1.9 as applicable?
What about a component made to our specification? Must we get an IQ, OQ, PQ from the vendor or have them conduct 100% inspection or is an AQL sufficient? Will a COC suffice in place of a validation? If in turn that vendor receives a sub-component from a sub-supplier do they need to do the same (validate or 100% inspect) and are we responsible for ensuring our vendor has completed this or again rely on their certification (COC).
Thanks for the help.
Elmer