What do you think of this objective of one of our suppliers (metal bar stock)?

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#1
Yesterday we had a meeting with one of our bar stock suppliers.

This supplier is a distributor, not a mill.
We had them in because we have been receiving a significant amount of material that does not meet the ASTM spec that we specify in our PO and that they (and the mill) agree to.

It came out in the meeting that one of their quality objectives is to minimize returns. And this objective applies to sales and warehousing. They get penalized if they go over a certain limit. And they are upset because we have had a lot of returns in 2007.
Well - tough. The standard is the standard and you agreed to that.

Anyway - I see this "objective" as a problem for me, the customer. To me this says that the sales group is incentivized to talk their customers in to not returning out of spec product. They are NOT incentivized to do a real root cause and go back to the mill or their handling processes.
In fact, the tact they've taken is that they can resell the stuff we return to another customer, therefore it's not defective and they refuse answer the SCAR with a real corrective action.

Am I being petty or is this just wrong?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
Yesterday we had a meeting with one of our bar stock suppliers.

This supplier is a distributor, not a mill.
We had them in because we have been receiving a significant amount of material that does not meet the ASTM spec that we specify in our PO and that they (and the mill) agree to.

It came out in the meeting that one of their quality objectives is to minimize returns. And this objective applies to sales and warehousing. They get penalized if they go over a certain limit. And they are upset because we have had a lot of returns in 2007.
Well - tough. The standard is the standard and you agreed to that.

Anyway - I see this "objective" as a problem for me, the customer. To me this says that the sales group is incentivized to talk their customers in to not returning out of spec product. They are NOT incentivized to do a real root cause and go back to the mill or their handling processes.
In fact, the tact they've taken is that they can resell the stuff we return to another customer, therefore it's not defective and they refuse answer the SCAR with a real corrective action.

Am I being petty or is this just wrong?
If they're knowingly misrepresenting their products, it's not just wrong, it's criminally wrong.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#3
I think they have the right goal, but the wrong motivation. There's nothing wrong with wanting to minimize returns-seems like a fairly good goal. However, to get upset with customers for returning unacceptable product is not the way to go about it. Keep the goal, but they need to focus on shipping acceptable product in the first place. Instead of 'busting your chops', they should be at the mill figuring out what is going on. I'm sure you are not their only customer. What kind of product are the other customers receiving, in addition to you?

It's no different that one unit of a large company exercising Lean practices. Oh sure, their numbers look good, but what about upstream and downstream?? It all has to work together.

Then again, I am horribly old-fashioned, in that the customer is right. I know that's idealistic, but hey! I have a vendor right now that I have called twice and sent an e-mail to; I have money to sign a contract to get them to come and do work. I cannot get them to follow-up. I'm sure somehow it's my fault.

If the distributor has no control over the mill, they should be willing to set more realistic goals.
 
G

Geoff Withnell

#4
Yesterday we had a meeting with one of our bar stock suppliers.

This supplier is a distributor, not a mill.
We had them in because we have been receiving a significant amount of material that does not meet the ASTM spec that we specify in our PO and that they (and the mill) agree to.

It came out in the meeting that one of their quality objectives is to minimize returns. And this objective applies to sales and warehousing. They get penalized if they go over a certain limit. And they are upset because we have had a lot of returns in 2007.
Well - tough. The standard is the standard and you agreed to that.

Anyway - I see this "objective" as a problem for me, the customer. To me this says that the sales group is incentivized to talk their customers in to not returning out of spec product. They are NOT incentivized to do a real root cause and go back to the mill or their handling processes.
In fact, the tact they've taken is that they can resell the stuff we return to another customer, therefore it's not defective and they refuse answer the SCAR with a real corrective action.

Am I being petty or is this just wrong?
The objective is wrong as it is being implemented. The sales group could be minimizing returns by making sure they correctly understand and transmit customer specs to the warehouse and shipping folks, thereby reducing the need for returns. But no. That is not how they are doing it. I think the problem with this supplier is much deeper than this objective, and goes to their values and management philosophy. I would find another bar stock distributor. Lord knows there are enough of them around. There are good ones, but many are fairly sleazy. I had one that shipped me 5 million pounds of a particular lot of certified alloy stock, when the mill cert said that lot was only 750,000 lbs total.


Geoff Withnell
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
The objective is wrong as it is being implemented. The sales group could be minimizing returns by making sure they correctly understand and transmit customer specs to the warehouse and shipping folks, thereby reducing the need for returns. But no. That is not how they are doing it. I think the problem with this supplier is much deeper than this objective, and goes to their values and management philosophy. I would find another bar stock distributor. Lord knows there are enough of them around. There are good ones, but many are fairly sleazy. I had one that shipped me 5 million pounds of a particular lot of certified alloy stock, when the mill cert said that lot was only 750,000 lbs total.


Geoff Withnell
We have other suppliers. This is our #2. Our #1 is being much more cooperative. But this ain't a small company. I wonder if it's a David and Goliath thing - my company being David.

To all - Yes, it's definately in the implementation. Can't argue with an objective to reduce returns.
But when a blanket corporate objective penalizes one group for something they don't control it seems it would cause this kind of issue.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#6
I think they have the right goal, but the wrong motivation. There's nothing wrong with wanting to minimize returns-seems like a fairly good goal.
This is a fairly common trap in goal-setting. Minimizing returns is not a good objective, for the reasons evident here. Preventing the causes of returns should be the goal, which, if accomplished, will minimize returns without giving anyone incentive to prevaricate.
 
G

Geoff Withnell

#7
This is a fairly common trap in goal-setting. Minimizing returns is not a good objective, for the reasons evident here. Preventing the causes of returns should be the goal, which, if accomplished, will minimize returns without giving anyone incentive to prevaricate.
:applause: Jim, you have put your finger on it (be sure to wash your hands!:D). Number of returns should be the METRIC. The objective is correct shipments.

Geoff Withnell
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#8
I am really glad that this thread was created. To me, it exemplifies, how a misinterpreted quality objective might affect customers. The metal distributor needs to do a much better job at 6.2.2d).

But, I am also very happy because it makes a point against those who think that ANY business objective IS a quality objective. Similarly to the scenario described herein, there are many other business objectives that could be detrimental to quality and customer satisfaction. Thus, not all objectives are meant to be quality objectives.
In fact, the tact they've taken is that they can resell the stuff we return to another customer, therefore it's not defective and they refuse answer the SCAR with a real corrective action.
That being the case, you know that supplier is unethical (at least). Keeping doing business with this type of supplier is a problem in itself, because you have to be extra vigilant with what they send you. I know that the metal distribution business is a seller's market right now, but the moment you lose confidence in a supplier is the moment you need to find an alternative source.

An ancient Burmese saying: Trust is like virginity; once you lose it, you can't get it back....:lol:
 
Last edited:

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
I am really glad that this thread was created. To me, it exemplifies, how a misinterpreted quality objective might affect customers. The metal distributor needs to do a much better job at 6.2.2d).

But, I am also very happy because it makes a point against those who think that ANY business objective IS a quality objective. Similarly to the scenario described herein, there are many other business objectives that could be detrimental to quality and customer satisfaction. Thus, not all objectives are meant to be quality objectives.
I agree with Sidney. Successful/respected organizations ensure that business and quality objectives are aligned for the good of all its stakeholders.

Stijloor.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Objective for Evaluation of Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4
J Quality Objective for QMS prior to Certification AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
D Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 10
N Best practices for capturing audit objective evidence in a practical manner? Internal Auditing 3
T Can we remove a quality objective if we decide it is not measurable? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
Ashok sunder What are the criteria for setting a target KPI value against a quality objective? Benchmarking 7
L Inspection Plan for Microscope Objective Lens Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
qualprod Is a Corrective Action Expected if a Quality Objective is not in compliance? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 38
S Ways to demonstrate objective evidence that employee is trained and competent ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 28
G FAI Objective Evidence AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
R Difference Process Objective/Opportunity for improvement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R CAPA Verification - ISO 13485:2016 Requirements and Objective Evidence ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Q Department Expansion as a Quality Objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
R What kind of Objective Evidence - AS9100 Cl. 7.1.6 - Organizational Knowledge AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
O Is the Quality Objective for Company-wide Training as >90% too high? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
Q Objective and Goals - ISO 9001:2008 Frequency Revision Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Jen Kirley Wells Fargo's fines came from Management By Objective Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
R Why customer satisfaction is not appropriate regulatory objective in medical device? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
R What objective evidence can/can't be supplied during a customer audit? General Auditing Discussions 3
F Quality Objective Reference Chart Customer Complaints 4
Chennaiite Audit Objective Evidence - the holy **** Imported Legacy Blogs 1
Y Must every Process have a Quality Objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
W Quality Objective clarification - Requirements for "levels within the organization" Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 9
T Quality Objective related Surveillance Audit Finding IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
M Using Continued Environmental Compliance as an Objective Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 7
N How would you approach failing quality objective measurables? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 12
J Definition of "objective" in 0.2 of ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
S Laboratory to Calibrate Objective Micrometer needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Q Storage Temperature - Medical Device - Objective Evidence - MDD 93/42/EEC Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
B How is Objective Evidence Admitted in an Internal Audit? Internal Auditing 8
S Objective Evidence for 8.2.1 and 8.2.3 - Compliance with Management System Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
K Does an Internal Audit provide Objective or Subjective Verification? Internal Auditing 14
P Quality Objectives - How can we make our quality objective? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 32
Q OER - Objective Evidence Report in AS9101D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
A Process Objectives and Metrics - Should every documented process have objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
R How to Achieve Multi Objective (Responses) Optimization in Minitab Using Minitab Software 17
R Can a Quality Policy include Health and Safety as an Objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
S Environmental Objective, Target, and Performance Indicator - Differences? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 16
P Can 'adding a new service' be a Quality Objective? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
K Are Surveys and Interviews considered Objective Measurements? Internal Auditing 25
I Service Supplier Rating where Objective Pass/Fail Data is not Available Service Industry Specific Topics 7
J Quality Objective Measureables - Please Review ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
M Objective Test System Validation Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
S Can one have a single 'objective' to meet the requirements of an IMS? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 20
N Quality Objective - Scrap Measureables ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
N New Seven Management Tools - Corporate Objective - Achieve 20% sales increase Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
hogheavenfarm Subjective vs Objective Finish Issues - Stainless Steel Bar Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 20
C Objective Evidence of Internal Auditors having Audit Clause 4.1. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
P Quality Objective not being met - Nonconformance or Observation? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
J Internal Audit NC ISO 9001 Clause Mapping - Quality Objective Achievement Plan ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom