Thanks. That makes sense.
Part of the reason we think of processes the way we do at my company is to try and eliminate confusion and ambiguity. "Process", "procedure", "program", "task", etc. are sometimes used interchangeably. We came up with this scheme so that people know precisely what we are talking about when we use these terms. It works for us and as far as I can tell it does not conflict with the standard, but it certainly is not prescribed by the standard.