Well, they say it's now 'process oriented' but it really has been all along. At least that's how I've done implementations for years. You lay out what your company does in a flow chart or two (top level) and then you start an evaluation. Where do you define inspections and tests, for example, or where do you review contracts? There's no specific requirement for this, I guess, but it's total common sense (which most if not all of ISO 9001 is).
To me, this is the real heart of the matter. All businesses should be thinking systems. My definition of systems is defined processes. To me a process is a system. When one flow charts a process you are (my definition) defining that 'system'. This is why for 12 years I have been doing business as Cayman Systems (more recently Cayman Business Systems).
The standard's requirements have hardly changed - the outline and distribution of requirements of the standard is what has been changed. Don't read more into this than there is.