What happened to Part 804? 820.198 (3) references part 803 or 804

B

bigup1ca

#1
Hi All,

Wanted to find out if any of the long timers here in the cove know what happened to Part 804? 820.198 (3) references part 803 or 804, but the current regs do not have a part 804. What did 804 pertain to and was 804 language absorbed into 803? Just curious.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#3
21 CFR Part 804 could be found HERE
but strangely NOT HERE in the Index of all CFRs

Strange - in one of the most recent approved 510 (K) summary from FDA, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf8/K083717.pdf they mention -

You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 804)-good-manufacturing-practice- requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
 
#4
Further search gave the following -

In the Federal Register of January 26,200O (65 FR 4112), FDA published a final rule (the January 2000 rule) that amended its MDR regulations governing reporting by manufacturers, importers, distributors, and user facilities of adverse events related to medical devices. These amendments were made to implement revisions to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
act) under the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). These regulations became effective March 27,200O. Under certain provisions of FDAMA, reporting requirements for distributors were eliminated, but reporting requirements for importers, and requirements for distributors to keep records concerning adverse device events and make them available to FDA upon request continue to apply. To accommodate these changes, part 804 (21 CFR part 804) was removed and language was integrated into part 803 (21 CFR part 803) that reflected the retention of importer reporting requirements and recordkeeping requirements for distributors.
 
M

MIREGMGR

#5
See this page:

http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/devadvice/351.html

The FDA Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA) Changes to medical device adverse event reporting (MDR) became effective on February 19, 1998. On January 26, 2000, we published in the Federal Register changes to the implementing regulations, 21 CFR 803 and 804, to reflect these amendments in the act. Also, Part 804 was removed.
Bold by me, not the FDA, of course.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Jim Wynne Article: Whatever Happened to Six Sigma? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 32
Watchcat Whatever happened to Eudamed 1.0? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
J What happened to EU DocsRoom? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
J What ever happened to Medical Device Risk Management, anyway? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 17
ScottK Let's Catch Up... what's happened to you since last June Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 24
M I was wondering what happened to them (Joke) Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 5
Marc Everything That?s Happened Since The Massive Chemical Spill In West Virginia Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 1
R Mix Multi-Site/Individual Certification - Has this ever happened to anyone? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 14
Claes Gefvenberg What happened to Firefox? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 27
E Reporting Requirements - Report to US FDA if a MDR event happened outside US Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
S Qantas Airbus incident - What really happened? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
Q What ever happened to the "Process is not systemic" finding ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
Jim Wynne Virus Hoaxes or, What Ever Happened to Fact-Checking? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 5
ScottK Whatever happened to a string tied around a finger... Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 10
GStough Has this happened to you? Internal Auditor challenges Lead Auditor Internal Auditing 17
Wesley Richardson Identity Theft - It just happened to one of my credit card accounts Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 20
K What happened to the 100% on-time delivery requirement? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
T 16949?.. what happened to 16948? Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 2
S Whatever happened to the employee satisfaction clause in TS 1999? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 2
N Final Product Audits - What happened to QS-9000 Clause 4.10.4.2? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G What ever happened to ISO 9000-1,-2 etc ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
T What ever happened to MIL-STD-45662A and MIL-HANDBOOK-52 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
S GR & R studies for 16 Cavity part Manufacturing and Related Processes 13
A Has anyone implemented the Adobe Acrobat Sign Validation Pack to be 21 CFR Part 11 Compliant? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
H Looking to make inspection faster for part with over 100 dimensions. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
S FCC Part 15, 18 harmonized to a standard? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
PQ Systems SQCpack Tech Tuesday Webinar 4-Part Series Using SQCpack Software 2
K Device part of combination product certification requirements Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
L "to be treated as APPLIED PART": is shopping in requirements allowed? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
X Separation of battery powered FB type applied part IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
N Direct Part Marking of the "CE" symbol- Class I Device EU Medical Device Regulations 1
P Controls over Systems Documentation in 21 CFR Part 11 Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
R Separation and PE Requirements of a Type B Applied Part IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
P Part 21G - Liabilities of a Quality Manager Form 4 Post Holder EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
W Part 145 Maintenance Data Review EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 1
C Part selection for Faro arm MSA Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
R Understanding ISO12944 (Part 4) Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Part submission warrant with every rev up of drawings APQP and PPAP 2
E Performing a GRR when you get multiple readings over time per part. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
K 13485 do e-signatures have to be 21 CFR Part 11 compliant? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
I Restricting scope to one part number for one customer IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
P Certifying Staff leaving Part-145 organisation EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
A Industry standard for stamped part Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2
P Can credentials (ID/PW) used to login be the same as when applying Electronic Signature (Part 11) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
M Mains on Patient with Part Attached to Protective Earth in Patient Area IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
M Documentation accompanying an aerospace part AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
H Better to retain previous made parts or one part that is perfect Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
T Accreditations as part of 9001 - Quality checks on your company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
T Customer Rejecting Part for Basic Dimension Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 16
H Should we stop inspecting a part if its never been rejected? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom