What if DOE (Design of Experiments) is not possible?

P

pagnonig

#1
Dear all,

I'm approaching the world of Six Sigma and during my first readings I came up with a doubt.


I understood that I can use DOE in order to find the y=f(x) function for multiple x. Different techniques are available depending on the number of x and other parameters.

My question is... what happens if I can't perform DOE. How can I determine the most influencing Xs and consequently the f(Xs) function in case of multiple inputs?

I hope I'm not too confused...
Thank you.

Giuseppe:bigwave::thanx:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Duke Okes

#2
It depends on what you mean by "can't perform DOEs." Are you talking about processes you can't measure, or lack of process time needed to perform the experiment, etc. ...?
 
P

pagnonig

#3
It depends on what you mean by "can't perform DOEs." Are you talking about processes you can't measure, or lack of process time needed to perform the experiment, etc. ...?
Thank you for your answer.

It means that I CAN measure the process (e.g I can sample it) but I can't perform a DOE because of a lack of process time.
 
D

Duke Okes

#4
I CAN measure the process (e.g I can sample it) but I can't perform a DOE because of a lack of process time.
Why is there a lack of process time? Is there inadequate capacity to meet current requirements? Is it a 24-hour operation? Is the problem not serious enough to justify taking the time for the experiment? Other reasons?
 
P

pagnonig

#5
Why is there a lack of process time? Is there inadequate capacity to meet current requirements? Is it a 24-hour operation? Is the problem not serious enough to justify taking the time for the experiment? Other reasons?
Dear Duke,

It not a practical case, I just wonder which are the alternatives to a DOE.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#6
If I understand you correctly, you are approaching this as a Regression Analysis. Namely, condition Y as a function of X (or multiple X's).

So, you are producing widgets (Y). You are wanting to identify the different variables (X) that will affect (Y) during production. However, you cannot manipulate any of the X values while it is running. Is that correct?

First, approach it from a common sense perspective. If you are making widget, on the surface what factors seem reasonable that would affect it? This is important. You cannot have a bunch of variables that appear with numbers to be related, but have no association. Your variables need to make sense.

Begin measuring these variables, and the states of your Y (output). With even data, you can develop a regression equation (or whatever type of analysis you would like).

There is more than one way to do research. Experimental design is where you manipulate one variable to observe the effect on another. However, a lot of research does not allow variables to be manipulated. Therefore, a theoretical case is made for a relationship, measurements are made, and the case is supported or not supported.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
I understood that I can use DOE in order to find the y=f(x) function for multiple x. Different techniques are available depending on the number of x and other parameters.

My question is... what happens if I can't perform DOE. How can I determine the most influencing Xs and consequently the f(Xs) function in case of multiple inputs?
This is precisely the advantage of SPC charts on an ongoing basis. Most processes have natural fluctuations in the input variables on a routine basis. You can plot the output variable on a control chart.

If there are significant trends (up or down) on the SPC chart, you can examine what the input variables were doing at the time of the trend and may be able to infer the y = f(x) relationship.

If the output variable is stable, then the assumption is made that the routine variation in the inputs doesn't have an effect on the output. Now, if the output is at a "good" level, you are in good shape. If it is stable in need of improvement, it does get a little tougher.
 
P

pagnonig

#8
If I understand you correctly, you are approaching this as a Regression Analysis. Namely, condition Y as a function of X (or multiple X's).

So, you are producing widgets (Y). You are wanting to identify the different variables (X) that will affect (Y) during production. However, you cannot manipulate any of the X values while it is running. Is that correct?

First, approach it from a common sense perspective. If you are making widget, on the surface what factors seem reasonable that would affect it? This is important. You cannot have a bunch of variables that appear with numbers to be related, but have no association. Your variables need to make sense.

Begin measuring these variables, and the states of your Y (output). With even data, you can develop a regression equation (or whatever type of analysis you would like).

There is more than one way to do research. Experimental design is where you manipulate one variable to observe the effect on another. However, a lot of research does not allow variables to be manipulated. Therefore, a theoretical case is made for a relationship, measurements are made, and the case is supported or not supported.
Brad, thank you for the excellent answer.
So I understand that if I can't carry out DOE's I have to apply a regression analysis in order to obtain the f(X) and to understand how the measured Xs influence the Y.
Any suggestion about docs or web material to read on this subject?
 
P

pagnonig

#9
This is precisely the advantage of SPC charts on an ongoing basis. Most processes have natural fluctuations in the input variables on a routine basis. You can plot the output variable on a control chart.

If there are significant trends (up or down) on the SPC chart, you can examine what the input variables were doing at the time of the trend and may be able to infer the y = f(x) relationship.

If the output variable is stable, then the assumption is made that the routine variation in the inputs doesn't have an effect on the output. Now, if the output is at a "good" level, you are in good shape. If it is stable in need of improvement, it does get a little tougher.
Thank you Steve, excellent answer as well!
 
D

Duke Okes

#10
Without knowing why you can't do the DOE it is difficult to know what alternatives might fit to your situation. However, here are some that might:

- use EVOP (more likely if chemical-type and/or continuous process)
- use component swapping (more likely if mechanical/electronic product) or other Shainin techniques
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J DoE (Design of Experiments) - Multiple responses with different factors Using Minitab Software 2
K Power point training slides on DOE (Design of Experiments) Wanted Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
N DOE (design of experiments) in Minitab 16 Using Minitab Software 6
P When can we apply DOE (Design of Experiments)? Six Sigma 8
P Cyclic Effect Factoring in DOE (Design of Experiments) Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
J How to Estimate the Number of Replicates on a DOE (Design of Experiments) Six Sigma 5
K Minitab Lack-of-Fit Test in DOE (Design of Experiments) Using Minitab Software 4
M Taguchi L4 Orthogonal Array Design of Experiments (DOE) in an Excel spreadsheet Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3
V Linking the FMEA Causes & Action Plan with DOE Experiments or Experimentation Design FMEA and Control Plans 1
B Taguchi DOE (Design of Experiments) example using Minitab Using Minitab Software 3
C 3 Factor DOE (Design of Experiments) Template Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
L DOE (Design of Experiments) suggestions Using Minitab Software 7
L DOE (Design of Experiments) - Analyse Variation with Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
E 5^2 DOE (Design of Experiments) with 3 Replications, 5 Levels 2 Factors Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
M DOE (Design of Experiments) for 3 Variables, Many Levels Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
J DOE (Design of Experiments) Dependent Factors Using Minitab Software 1
C DOE (Design of Experiments) with 'Uncontrollable' Factors Using Minitab Software 5
Q DOE (Design of Experiments) for Accounting - New to Minitab need help Using Minitab Software 5
M DOE (Design of Experiments) - CQE Primer question Professional Certifications and Degrees 4
C Training courses for DOE (Design of Experiments) Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
P Taguchi method using Minitab - DOE (Design of Experiments) Help Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 7
S Sample Size Attribute DOE (Design of Experiments) Six Sigma 9
M Excel files for DOE (Design of Experiments) Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 6
T Minitab - Mixture DOE (Design of Experiments) - Sandability of a Gelcoat Using Minitab Software 5
R Custom DOE (Design of Experiments) Analysis in JMP Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
P Need help on DOE (Design of Experiments) - EPS molding process Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 2
A Good books on DOE (Design of Experiments) - Recommendations wanted Book, Video, Blog and Web Site Reviews and Recommendations 3
T Design of Experiments - DOE with Centre Point Using Minitab Software 7
Q Design of Experiments Using Subgroup Data - Conducting a 2^3 factorial DoE Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 6
T Screening DOE (Design of Experiments) with qualitative response Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 23
A The basics of DOE (Design of Experiments) & Validation Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
M Design of Experiments (DOE) - Help with homework problem Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
M DOE (Design of Experiments) with 3 factors with levels of 3,3 and 5 Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 3
J DOE (Design of Experiments) for ultrasonically welding plastic lids Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 15
C Shainin and DOE (Design of Experiments) Information Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
A DOE - Design of Experiments? What does that mean? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
P DOE (Design of Experiments) or Hypothesis test? Applicability and use of each? Six Sigma 6
T DOE (Design of Experiments) for Powder Coating Thickness Six Sigma 9
Tim Folkerts Do you DOE? Use of "Design of Experiments" Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 35
F DOE (Design of Experiments) Help: Montgomery's Industrial Engineering book Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
A Shainin vs. Fisher vs. Taguchi DOE (Design of Experiments) Statistical Analysis Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 10
A DOE - Design of Experiments - Shainin Design and Development of Products and Processes 7
C Seeking Help: Design of Experiments - DOE Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
J Selecting factors for screening DoE design Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
D Minitab - Design combinations (DOE) Using Minitab Software 4
P Help Setting Up and Analyzing 3 Factor 2 Level Full Factorial Design for DOE Using Minitab Software 3
B Analyze 'Factorial Design' or 'Variability' - Difference when used for DOE Analysis? Using Minitab Software 1
R To Find Out Second Order Model from First Order Factorial Design (DOE) Using Minitab Software 9
B Validation of DoE (Design of Experiements) Model - Minitab 15 Using Minitab Software 3
C DoE and ANOVA - 4 factor and 3 levels Taguchi design with 2 replicates Using Minitab Software 14

Similar threads

Top Bottom