SBS - The best value in QMS software

What is required to tell customers after Audit where nonconformances are found

P

potdar

#11
So where is the issue?
It is that my internal staff is unsure of what to tell the customer auditor. We're new at this and learning, and I am getting my ducks in a row. Thanks all for being my ducks? or a duck-subset.
You guys and gals have been invaluable to me!
Signed, the incompetent quality manager that can!
My answer would remain the same. Customer auditor or any other auditor, never hide anything from them (or volunteer anything). Just present the system as it is - A system that may go wrong at times, but has a robust functioning mechanism to locate the issues and take care of them without hurting customer interest.

Just make sure that the system can be presented in this light before you call them in. Thats all.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

Ramani

#12
As long as there is no clear link between the NCRs & your current Customer compliants, these are still only a Potential NCR
I am sure you would have Containment, Corrective actions planned or Initiated
Preventive can come later
This should satisfy a reasonable auditor9even if it is a customer auditor1)

If there is no contractual obligation, you may wait till their audit

In which area was your Major NCR was on

Agree with Potdar
'Zero defect' is Utopia
System are there to Minimize surprises
 
#13
So where is the issue?
It is that my internal staff is unsure of what to tell the customer auditor. We're new at this and learning, and I am getting my ducks in a row. Thanks all for being my ducks? or a duck-subset.
You guys and gals have been invaluable to me!
Signed, the incompetent quality manager that can!
From a realistic standpoint, I would not be afraid to lay out everything. Not only what was found, but discuss the corrective action plans that are in the works. Spend a few minutes during the opening meeting to discuss how these nonconformities are showing how you system works. Nonconformities should not be viewed as a bad thing. They are just things. When discovered, they show two things. 1) that the system to uncover nonconformities works, and 2) that the system to use nonconformities (and OFI's for that matter) to improve the system also works.
I would much rather find 10 valid nonconformities, than to not find any when those same 10 exist.

As fuzzy stated: Stand behind your system. Don't make excuses. The system uncovered nonconformities and the system is correcting them (and their root causes). The system is working fine, thank you very much.
 
F

fuzzy

#14
So where is the issue?
It is that my internal staff is unsure of what to tell the customer auditor. We're new at this and learning, and I am getting my ducks in a row. Thanks all for being my ducks? or a duck-subset.
You guys and gals have been invaluable to me!
Signed, the incompetent quality manager that can!
I don't know you well enough to judge for sure:notme: , but I doubt that you are incompentent in any way. You're skilled enough to come here and ask for help; to admit you don't know what you don't know. Don't beat yourself down, and never ever make the mistake of letting an audit result (positive or negative) become the defintion of you.:D
 
L

lrowe

#15
I don't know you well enough to judge for sure:notme: , but I doubt that you are incompentent in any way. You're skilled enough to come here and ask for help; to admit you don't know what you don't know. Don't beat yourself down, and never ever make the mistake of letting an audit result (positive or negative) become the defintion of you.:D
Well said Fuzzy. Few things get my goat more when somehow ANYTHING that is part of the QMS is considered the resposibility of the Quality department - especially when it goes wrong. They might as well blame you for not paying the gas bill right away too since you have about as much control over that as you do when the rest of the employee zone out when making product.

And while I'm here I say unless specifically documented somewhere, there is no need to share one audit's results unless the second audit want to right a similar finding and then show you are already taking action for that particular case.

Hang tough!!

Larry
 
#16
From a realistic standpoint, I would not be afraid to lay out everything. Not only what was found, but discuss the corrective action plans that are in the works. Spend a few minutes during the opening meeting to discuss how these nonconformities are showing how you system works. Nonconformities should not be viewed as a bad thing.
Wow, db. This is one of the few times that I thoroughly disagree with you. I would only even consider doing this with 1 out of the 5 external auditors that I "know" and see regularly. The other 4 would jump on this like a duck on a junebug and use it to stuff their report full without actually having to do any work.:mad: Evidence of my finely tuned corrective action system would be pearls before swine. The 1 good auditor always looks through my entire CI-PA-CA system log anyway, so why bother? I agree with POTDAR above. I don't have ANYTHING to hide but I NEVER volunteer.

I do agree that nonconformities should not be viewed as a bad thing. It is just my experience that you and RJK are the 20% auditors. The other 80% make volunteering CA's way more risky than making them work for it.
 
J

just67horns

#17
Just a note:
I discussed it with the auditor, and he shall be visiting in January, after our re-audit and certificate! (fingers crossed)
 

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#18
Wow, db. This is one of the few times that I thoroughly disagree with you. I would only even consider doing this with 1 out of the 5 external auditors that I "know" and see regularly. The other 4 would jump on this like a duck on a junebug and use it to stuff their report full without actually having to do any work.:mad: Evidence of my finely tuned corrective action system would be pearls before swine. The 1 good auditor always looks through my entire CI-PA-CA system log anyway, so why bother? I agree with POTDAR above. I don't have ANYTHING to hide but I NEVER volunteer.

I do agree that nonconformities should not be viewed as a bad thing. It is just my experience that you and RJK are the 20% auditors. The other 80% make volunteering CA's way more risky than making them work for it.

I like the one good auditor you mention. But, if the others are so bad, why do you keep them?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R "Medical devices" required in scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
OpExPro AIAG VDA DFMEA Template Required FMEA and Control Plans 2
B PMA Supplement Required? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
F UDI-PI required on packaging (MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S Required tests for Surgical gown US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
I IQOQ or just initial calibration required? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B NIOSH Approval for Surgical N95 Respirators - Required testing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
A Is calibration of test weight required General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
A 8.6 Release of products and services, 8.3 Design and development - evidence required ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
D Deciding whether or not pre-market clinical investigation is required for low risk device EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R Green dot required on packaging? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Indian Medical Device Rules - Manufacturing and Wholesale Lic. Required? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 12
M Is IEC 60601-1-2 required by FDA for all electronic medical devices? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
B Where to acquire EN 868-5 required dye (Amaranth red)? Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
Marcel DS How do I know if my product is required be RoHS certified? REACH and RoHS Conversations 6
K When is Bioburden Testing Required? Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
G Is repeatability required for equipment calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
D Device functionality over service life - Objective evidence required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 10
M Quality management certification required by Health Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 3
N Usability testing required for FDA IDE (investigational device exemption)? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 8
M Case study solution help required as per ISO 9001 : 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
R Shall a new UDI-DI be required when stand-alone software device's version is updated? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Question on ISO 14001:2015 - Are annual audits required? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 11
M Is Validation of Plating Processes required and who is responsible? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 11
MDD_QNA Medical Device Software - Is a Help Button required? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
O ISO 13485 - Is management review required before stage 1? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Recent changes to ISO 14971 - SOP required for managing standard revisions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Jane's Like-for-like critical raw material change qualification - type of testing/ number of lots required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
V Manufacturing requirements for respiratory ventilators - clean room required? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
A When there is a 2 year lapse in production, is a full FAI required? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
C Is it required to put"Rx only" on the home page of an app? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
B IEC 60601-2-10 - Accuracy of Pulse Parameters - Required Measurement Uncertainty IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S Is Optical Parallel Set required calibration? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
R Is it required to have an SOP for external audits? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
M MDR - Is a formal GSPR Procedure required? EU Medical Device Regulations 20
M When is FAI required? AS9100 8.5.1.3 and 8.4.3 requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
B IATF 16949 - Is a Deviation required for sample components in a prototype build? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
J MDD to MDR transition - Time required for the implementation of the MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 7
Robert Stanley Required Documentation Templates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M ISO 9001:2015 8.2.1 Contingency Plan required for small Business? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M MDR - Under what circumstances is a PMCF not required? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
B AIAG-VDA FMEA - When the new format will be required FMEA and Control Plans 5
MrTetris Are GLP required for testing cytotoxicity and soil remaining after sterilization of MD? Other Medical Device Related Standards 8
Z EN 868-8 "required tests" - Rigid sterilization containers Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
D Design Verification - Is testing required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
M User manual / instructions for use for class II device always required? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
A Calibration required by OEM General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
S How many mandays required for the below mentioned standards IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
S Examples of software changes that required a 510k US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom