SBS - The best value in QMS software

What is the correct way to refer to NIST?

Romane

Starting to get Involved
#1
Good day.
What is the correct way to refer to NIST? Is it sufficient to state that xxx measuring equipment has been calibrated using NIST? or should we expect to have a procedure number after NIST?
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#2
You need to cite something specific such as a NIST procedure (or procedures) or specific NIST requirements.

"...using NIST..." isn't specific enough in your internal documents. It is too vague.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#3
Good day.
What is the correct way to refer to NIST? Is it sufficient to state that xxx measuring equipment has been calibrated using NIST? or should we expect to have a procedure number after NIST?
Thanks in advance.
Are you trying to ask if, in your calibration certificate, there should be traceability information that allows full traceability to a NIST standard? Your question, as is, is not clearly formulated.
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#4
First, in answer to your question, here is what NIST says about referencing their "number":

" I.B.4 Is a NIST Test Report Number necessary and/or sufficient evidence of traceability?
Test report numbers issued by NIST are intended to be used solely for administrative purposes. Although they are often used to uniquely identify documents which bear evidence of traceability, test report numbers themselves do not address the issues listed in I.B.1 above, and should not be used nor required as the sole proof of traceability. "

This means that just because someone produces a "NIST number" on their certificate this is not proof by itself that the measurement is traceable.


So, in memory of Bob Pease, "What's all this Traceability Stuff, Anyhow?"

First question. What does a calibration certificate prove? That the equipment calibrated is in tolerance, accurate.
Great. But what does that really mean? And what is the NIST reference about?

Back in the not so good old days when you bought and sold items you had to trust that the merchant was using "honest" weights. In time it was decided that the government needed to step in and assure that a pound in London weighed the same as a pound in Boston. That set up the establishment of the BIPM, the international organization based in France that held the "golden" standards of weights and measures, also known as the SI units. They made duplicates of these standards and distributed them to member countries. In the United States those are held by NIST (OK purists, I know that these are no longer physical artifacts, but let's agree to simplify things for this lesson). This is why you see that things are "Traceable to NIST" - that means that we can compare our results to ones produced at NIST, so everyone compares to the same standard. That means you should get the same results everywhere.

So what does this mean for calibrations?
The requirement is "The laboratory shall ensure that measurement results are traceable to the International System of Units (SI)..."
You do that through a process of Metrological Traceability:

Establishing metrological traceability
Metrological traceability is established by considering, and then ensuring, the following:
a) the specification of the measurand (quantity to be measured);
b) a documented unbroken chain of calibrations going back to stated and appropriate references
(appropriate references include national or international standards, and intrinsic standards);
c) that measurement uncertainty for each step in the traceability chain is evaluated according to
agreed methods;
d) that each step of the chain is performed in accordance with appropriate methods, with the
measurement results and with associated, recorded measurement uncertainties;
e) that the laboratories performing one or more steps in the chain supply evidence for their technical
competence.

So the "appropriate references" referred to here are the "Traceable to NIST" statements you see on calibration certificates. That does not mean that the item was calibrated at NIST, just that you can trace the measurements directly back to NIST. Also, NIST is only one of many National Laboratories who are BIPM members, so Canada has their NRC, Great Britain the NPL, Germany the PTB, etc. That's why many calibration certificates refer to "NIST or other National Laboratory" in their traceability statements.
 

Romane

Starting to get Involved
#5
Thank you dwperron. This is very helpful.
BTW I wish you that your dream comes true if it is for the good of all life!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Correct Calibration Method for Dial Depth Gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
K AS9100 - 7.3 - Are these black and white questions with specific correct answers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
E Correct way to certify hydrostatic testing when it is not 100% (and Sample Size) Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 6
T Correct MSA study for an automated camera system which makes attribute inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
M NANDO codes of products - These are not the GMDN codes, correct? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
K The correct way of doing a 2 Sample T test Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
B PED 2014/68/EU - Is this Traceability audit finding correct? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
K Assigning the Correct Procedures Applicable to Job Titles General Auditing Discussions 15
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 14
M Specifications Aerospace - Who is responsible for providing the correct specification(s) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 14
supadrai OEM Changing the name of the manufacturer - length of process? Is 1-3 months correct? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
J How long should I have to correct an audit finding? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 7
E SPC for Dummies - The correct meaning of all the graphs Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
C UDI Label Verification - How do we ensure the barcode is correct and prove it? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
N Correct reading for analog pressure gauge ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
J How to measure process quality? Is DPPM the correct metric? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5
P The correct way to do a Linearity and Stability Study on a Critical Dimension Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
L Choosing the correct Distribution for Acceptance Sampling Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 19
A Safety Shoes & Temporary Workers - Is it correct to reuse again or not? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 11
S Definition MTBF and MCBF Correct Definitions Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 5
T What is the correct UMDNS Code for Tracheostomy Tube? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
E Correct Statistical Test comparing 2 Groups Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 14
N What is the easiest way to verify we have the correct customer supplied materials? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
D The correct way to analyze Skewed Data using Minitab Using Minitab Software 3
C Rolling the correct M8 1.25 Pin Thread Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
E Database search is correct to capture medical device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Choosing the correct Elisa Test Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 1
J TS 16949 - Which definition of Automotive is correct? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
L Correct Sample Size for Attribute Gage R&R (Good / Bad parts) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
R Correct Cable Ports After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 2
S Is it gramatically correct to say Singapore people or Singaporeans ? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 12
H Determining the Correct Sample Size when AQL points to two Sample Sizes AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 7
J How IAQG plans to ensure that correct PEAR level determination is done by Auditors? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
K AS9102 Form 3 for Assemblies - Verification that the Assembly is Correct AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
J MSA Emergency - PV%=100(PV/TOL)in American? And that is correct? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 13
F Can you tell me if this table is correct? Gage R&R Problems Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
T Is the following flow for Training Needs Analysis correct? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
M Calculating Cp and Cpk - Is my calculation correct? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
J Are my Cpk and Cp Calculations Correct? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
D What is the correct Working Standard for Digital Micrometer? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 21
T Correct use of NPT (National Pipe Thread) Thread Gages General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 15
R First Pass Yield - Am I doing correct the First Pass Yield Metric Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
C Correct Tool for Gage R&R - Assay Dilutions Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
B How to Correct Bad Employee Performance-Attendance and/or Tardiness Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 84
R How to determine the correct Sample Frequency for SPC Features Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 66
Q Latest ISO 9001:2008 Rev. E - Correct? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
bobdoering The CORRECT steps to implement an SPC chart Imported Legacy Blogs 16
E Orthographic Projection - Which view is correct? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
M Calculating correct Cpk - Getting different answers Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom