What is the difference between in house calibration and verification?

K

kbng82

#1
hi all,

all the time we sent the monitoring and measuring devices to external parties for calibration but this year in order to save cost, i was asked to carry out so-called "in house calibration/ verification". i was asked to send only one of each type of equipment for external calibration and keep that as a standard, for example ruler or micrometer. and using that as a standard, i measure things using the "standard" equipment and also non-externally-calibrated equipment, if i can get the same measured value, the equipment is considered "verified" or "calibrated". does this make sense? how often do i do the verification...do i need to have the working instruction? do i need to justify which equipment can be verified this way and which cannot?

thanks for reply.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
G

Gert Sorensen

#2
Re: does this called in house calibration or verification?

hi all,

all the time we sent the monitoring and measuring devices to external parties for calibration but this year in order to save cost, i was asked to carry out so-called "in house calibration/ verification". i was asked to send only one of each type of equipment for external calibration and keep that as a standard, for example ruler or micrometer. and using that as a standard, i measure things using the "standard" equipment and also non-externally-calibrated equipment, if i can get the same measured value, the equipment is considered "verified" or "calibrated". does this make sense? how often do i do the verification...do i need to have the working instruction? do i need to justify which equipment can be verified this way and which cannot?

thanks for reply.
If you have the proper training for performing in house calibration, then the usual way of doing it is to send out master equipment: gages, blocks, micrometers, rulers etc. for external calibration. Using the master equipment you then calibrate day to day equipment in house. Some equipment may need a high degree of confidence in the calibration and should therefore be calibrated externally. But, if this is the case then you definitely need to evaluate the use of the equipment in house due to the fact that the majority of a measurement uncertainty is related to handling. :bigwave:
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
Re: does this called in house calibration or verification?

I moved this to the 17025 thread because this type of question may receive more technically specific answers from calibration folks in this thead.
 
F

fireonce

#4
Re: does this called in house calibration or verification?

Yes,this is called in house calibration or verification,but what you did is not fully complied with the requirements of ISO9000.you are suppose to set up a series of procedures and standards.
If you want to comply with Iso9000, you have a lot of things to do.
 
K

kbng82

#5
Re: does this called in house calibration or verification?

thanks for your prompt reply.

mind sharing some procedure or WI in order for me to comply with ISO 9001? Simple equipment, RULER for instance, to check the measured value against the measured value using externally-calibrated, is there requirement regarding how many reading must be taken, tolerance, etc.... i have no idea about this but auditor did ask me to do so on simple equipment to save money... there is no such kind of training provided yet in this company on calibration...

another question...the standard equipment got to be the standard equipment for every year and can the equipments of its kind take turn to be the standard equipment?

help!!! i need a procedure on this...
 
F

Frank T.

#6
Re: does this called in house calibration or verification?

mind sharing some procedure or WI...........

You can find procedures and WI in the post attachments list on page 9. You have to scroll about mid page to find what I think your looking for.

Hope this helps.......:cfingers:
 
B

Benjamin28

#8
Really this all can be answered by what standard you are being held to, or holding yourself to. How complex is the equipment you're talking about? Take your ruler example for instance...you'd have to ask yourself what kind of precision you need, for linear measurement such as this there are many routes to go, you could verify your rulers on a calibrated profile projector, or against a standard gage block set, or against a calibrated caliper.

As for your calibration/verification intervals, this is left up to you, once again risk, cost, and common sense will give you guidance. Some of your customers or your registrar may require regulated intervals for certain instruments, OEMs may have suggested calibration frequencies, and finally historical performance data of the instruments, all this will give you guidance for setting your cal intervals.

One thing I'd like to point out however, comparing an externally calibrated instrument against an operational instrument of the same family may not be the best route to take with this. Such as a micrometer, if you're measuring a part with your master mic, and then comparing against your operational mic, this is all well and good, however, you'd be better off just using a NIST traceable gage block as the block will be uniform, calibrated...if you're using an appropriate gage block there is no need to have a "master mic" in this case and you'll be able to calibrate/verify most of your linear measurement instruments off this set of blocks, thus one reference standard, calibrated and traceable, is used for multiple instruments and the cost/upkeep will likely be lower and easier to maintain. Be sure whatever methods you use are acceptable by your customers and registrar...if they think you're just doing op checks vs a thorough calibration/verification they may not find this acceptable.

My suggestion, do some review, compile what type of standards will be needed, how much manpower will be needed, training, and what type of facility requirements will be involved, calculate the costs involved and present this to your boss...he will be glad to see what type of savings or lackthereof will be involved. Keep in mind, if you need precise calibration you will also need to have a controlled environment, temp, humidity, lighting, vibration, etc... The point I'm making, is before you jump off the bridge make sure your chute is properly packed, latched, the wind is right, and there are no crocodiles in the river below you.

Best of luck :cfingers:

Oh, to add to this....how many points should be verified in the range, once again this depends...typically you want to verify an instrument over it's full range, acceptable practice in most cases is to do five points over the range of the instrument.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#9
Benjamin, that was a superb post.:agree1:

I would like to add support to Benjamin's post. If you took some time to add up your costs, is your company sure you will be saving money? There are a lot of costs associated with maintaining an internal calibration facility.

Suggestion:
Go through and look at Hershal's, Jerry's, and others posts in the calibration/ISO17025 forum. My point I am trying to make is there are a lot of variables in calibration, training, environment, etc. that will influence properly performing internal calibrations.

As far as your standards, you need to keep standards that are superior in accuracy to the instruments you are calibrating. Hence the need for gauge block standards, etc.

But.. if this is a mandatory reality in your situation, here are some suggestions:

1. Determine the costs for developing an appropriate calibration environment (temperature, humidity, vibration, etc.)

2. Determine the costs for obtaining/maintaining standards for the desired purpose. This includes downtime, calculating uncertainties, redundant instruments, replacement costs, etc.

3. Determine the costs for obtaining procedures, labor, training materials, cost of training, etc.

4. Make sure that this initiative will be funded for several years to come.

Providing procedures is a whole other matter. It will depend on the manufacture/model of the various equipment. If you are doing government contracts, then you may can access GIDEP for procedures. You may can contact the MFG. of the equipment and see if they have procedures available.

I hope I have not frustrated you. It's just I've seen so many times that organizations are saving a whole lot less money through internal calibrations than they may think. But, we're here to help, if that is what you want to do.
 

bobdoering

Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
#10
One thing I'd like to point out however, comparing an externally calibrated instrument against an operational instrument of the same family may not be the best route to take with this. Such as a micrometer, if you're measuring a part with your master mic, and then comparing against your operational mic, this is all well and good, however, you'd be better off just using a NIST traceable gage block as the block will be uniform, calibrated...if you're using an appropriate gage block there is no need to have a "master mic" in this case and you'll be able to calibrate/verify most of your linear measurement instruments off this set of blocks, thus one reference standard, calibrated and traceable, is used for multiple instruments and the cost/upkeep will likely be lower and easier to maintain. Be sure whatever methods you use are acceptable by your customers and registrar...if they think you're just doing op checks vs a thorough calibration/verification they may not find this acceptable.
I believe the rule of thumb is that the standard be 4:1 more accurate (or, more precisely collective uncertainty) than the instrument being calibrated. For example, that is typically why gage blocks (of the correct grade) are used for standard for hand gages. It would also eliminate the comparative approach for calibration, although it might be used as an awkward verification. Don't forget, you need to do various lengths across the range of the device for linearity, etc. And, other checks may need to be done that your approach will miss, such as flatness (wear) across micrometer anvils usually require optical flats and its associated monochromatic light, etc. It may never show up on comparative checks.

One suggestion: get calibration training before calibrating. Pure and simple.:cool:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Difference between Laboratory developed & In-house methods General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
W What is the difference between TYPE B and TYPE BF? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
T The difference between ISO 14644-3:2005 and ISO 14644:2019 Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
Q Terminal Lugs sizes - Difference between 225/24 vs. 275/24 lugs Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
M Difference between "Production Trial Run" and "Run at Rate" IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
D Difference between Test Method Validation and Gage R&R Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 18
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
R What's the major difference between Green Belt and Black Belt in term of training and project Six Sigma 3
T Difference between a subcontractor and a supplier ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 21
H Difference between Stainless Steel 316 ASTM F899 and ASTM A276 Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
A Exact terms for a plating failure and difference between rejection rate and failure rate Manufacturing and Related Processes 9
M Difference between MSA and MSE? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
gramps What is the difference between discrete and continuous variables? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 3
JoCam Difference between Approval and Registration - ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Difference between EU-MDR Annex IX and the Annex-combo X&XI EU Medical Device Regulations 4
T ISO 17025:2017 Clause 4.2.2 - The difference between "be notified" and "be informed" ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Jimmy123 What is the difference between Error Proofing and Controls? ISO/IATF 16949 - Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 16
C IEC 60601-1-8, difference between table 4 and annex D IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
A What is the difference between Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Q What is the difference between AS9100D 9.3.2.f and 9.3.3.a AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
M Aluminum - What is the difference between 6061-T6 and 6061-T651 (both per ASTM B211)? Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
P What is the exact difference between Risk and Opportunity in context of ISO 27001? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 7
S Difference between Surface Finish (Ra) and Flatness (GD&T) Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
O Air Flow - Which is the operational difference between LAF (vertical and horizontal) and RLAF? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S What the difference is between Stub Acme & Acme thread? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
S DO 178B - What is the difference between review and verification? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
T The difference between SOP and Kaizen Standardization Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
K Difference between intended purpose and intended use of the device EU Medical Device Regulations 9
Q What is the difference between normal and licensed internal auditor? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 9
J What is the difference between Process Variation and Tolerance? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
O Difference Between PFMEA & Control Plan FMEA and Control Plans 3
S Difference between an Advisory Notice (ISO 13485) and a Field Safety Notice? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T Difference between "data analysis" and "management review" ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
qualprod What is the difference between 7.4.1 (2008) and 8.4.1 (2015)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
D Difference between uncertainty and expanded uncertainty of measurement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
S EASA Part 145 - The difference between non-certifying staff and Certifying staff Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 2
S The difference between a Medical Device Accessory and Component Canada Medical Device Regulations 2
S What is the difference between a service request and a complaint? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
I What is the difference between OOS/OOT Imported Legacy Blogs 3
A Definition Difference between Quality System Procedure and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 4
Q Difference between Monitor & Measurement ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
T QA vs. RA - The difference between QA and RA Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 6
A Difference between Discrimination and Least Count IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
K Difference between Medical Electrical Equipment and Medical Equipment System IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Usability Standard - The difference between IEC 60601-1-6 to IEC 62336 Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 1
S What is the difference between Verification and Validation of Test Reports? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
A Difference between ISO 9001:2015 Clauses 8.1 and 8.5.1 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.2.2 vs 8.6.5 - Is there any difference between these clauses? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C What is the difference between "Overall Risk" and "Risk"? (ISO 14971) ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 10
C The difference between a Critical Dimension vs. Critical Characteristic Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom