What kind of information needs to be in a calibration record?

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#21
So you're saying that verification is a result of calibration?
What I am saying is that Metrology is a precision business.
Our language often needs to be just as precise.
There is a difference between calibration and verification.
Those differences get lost because we are careless in how we use the terms. That leads to confusion.

Probably the best example of this is specification, tolerance, accuracy, and uncertainty. They all mean something different, but they are tossed around as synonyms, leading to confusion.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#22
What I am saying is that Metrology is a precision business.
Our language often needs to be just as precise.
There is a difference between calibration and verification.
Those differences get lost because we are careless in how we use the terms. That leads to confusion.

Probably the best example of this is specification, tolerance, accuracy, and uncertainty. They all mean something different, but they are tossed around as synonyms, leading to confusion.
"Specification" and "uncertainty" are used synonymously? If you perceive a difference between calibration and verification, it's because you're using your own definitions, or definitions that someone else uses and you've personally adopted them and now expect the world to adopt them too. It doesn't work that way. Here are some examples of calibration that don't fit your definition(s):

Self-calibrating thermometer

Self-calibrating scales

Calibrate before each use

In that last example, when making a very close-tolerance measurement with say, a micrometer, it's always a good idea to pull out the gage blocks and verify that the mic is reading accurately. That's a verification, but it's also synonymously an act of calibration.

When you use an eccentric definition for any word(s)--one that conflicts with standard dictionary definition--it needs to be made clear to everyone that the dictionary has been thrown out the window and the eccentric definitions are to be considered normative. There's nothing necessarily wrong with this, but in our business engaging in Humpty-Dumptyism must always be avoided.
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#23
"Specification" and "uncertainty" are used synonymously? If you perceive a difference between calibration and verification, it's because you're using your own definitions, or definitions that someone else uses and you've personally adopted them and now expect the world to adopt them too. It doesn't work that way. Here are some examples of calibration that don't fit your definition(s):

Self-calibrating thermometer

Self-calibrating scales

Calibrate before each use

In that last example, when making a very close-tolerance measurement with say, a micrometer, it's always a good idea to pull out the gage blocks and verify that the mic is reading accurately. That's a verification, but it's also synonymously an act of calibration.

When you use an eccentric definition for any word(s)--one that conflicts with standard dictionary definition--it needs to be made clear to everyone that the dictionary has been thrown out the window and the eccentric definitions are to be considered normative. There's nothing necessarily wrong with this, but in our business engaging in Humpty-Dumptyism must always be avoided.
My last attempt at a response.

I am NOT making up my own definitions.
These are the internationally accepted and defined terms quoted directly from the VIM (International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM). As a matter of fact, there is a new document, VIM3, which provides the VIM definitions along with Informative Annotations, in an attempt to make them clearer. This is a Note found under the definition of Calibration:

"NOTE 2 Calibration should not be confused with adjustment of a measuring system, often mistakenly called “self-calibration”, nor with verification of calibration. "

We Metrology professionals do not take our definitions for Metrology terms from Webster or Wikipedia, or from advertisements.
If you choose to differ from these internationally accepted definitions I would suggest that you take it up with them, and let the folks at BIPM know that they are wrong.
Since I am called to comply with standards such as ISO 17025 and ISO 10012, which refer to the VIM for definitions of terms in their documents, I will continue to use those definitions. They provide clarity where your mashup definitions provide mud.

Again, I point out that accuracy, tolerance, and uncertainty are very often used as synonyms. Just because this happens very often does not make them mean the same thing. Because they don't.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#24
I am NOT making up my own definitions.
These are the internationally accepted and defined terms quoted directly from the VIM (International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM). As a matter of fact, there is a new document, VIM3, which provides the VIM definitions along with Informative Annotations, in an attempt to make them clearer.
Somewhere above I suggested that you are making up your own definitions or subscribing to definitions that someone else has made up. There are people calibrating and verifying all over the world who have never even heard of VIM. That's because they don't need to. Such is not the case for commercial calibration labs operating under 17025 requirements, or captive labs that have adopted the VIM definitions. My point is that the VIM definitions are far from "universal." They're a set of eccentric definitions intended to create understanding amongst an insignificantly small group of professionals. That group does not rule the world of lexicography.

We Metrology professionals do not take our definitions for Metrology terms from Webster or Wikipedia, or from advertisements.
If you choose to differ from these internationally accepted definitions I would suggest that you take it up with them, and let the folks at BIPM know that they are wrong.
They are "internationally accepted" only within a relatively small group.

Since I am called to comply with standards such as ISO 17025 and ISO 10012, which refer to the VIM for definitions of terms in their documents, I will continue to use those definitions. They provide clarity where your mashup definitions provide mud.
So outside of the tiny world of VIM and its adherents, calibration is not a form of verification. That's Humpty-Dumptyism at its finest.

Now I'm done too.
 

dwperron

Trusted Information Resource
#25
Somewhere above I suggested that you are making up your own definitions or subscribing to definitions that someone else has made up. There are people calibrating and verifying all over the world who have never even heard of VIM. That's because they don't need to. Such is not the case for commercial calibration labs operating under 17025 requirements, or captive labs that have adopted the VIM definitions. My point is that the VIM definitions are far from "universal." They're a set of eccentric definitions intended to create understanding amongst an insignificantly small group of professionals. That group does not rule the world of lexicography.


They are "internationally accepted" only within a relatively small group.

So outside of the tiny world of VIM and its adherents, calibration is not a form of verification. That's Humpty-Dumptyism at its finest.

Now I'm done too.
There are people calibrating and verifying all over the world who have never even heard of VIM.
Are they people you want calibrating your equipment?
Yes, there are also underqualified people purporting to be skilled professionals in many businesses. I don't know for sure, but it seems like you are rooted in the bad old days of "cal labs" - places that slapped stickers on equipment. Look into the industry today and you will see that it is very different from 30 years ago, a much higher skill level and professionalism.

"They're a set of eccentric definitions intended to create understanding amongst an insignificantly small group of professionals."
They are a set of clear, concise definitions that were carefully chosen to promote clear communication amongst measurement professionals.
Sad to see that you feel we are an "insignificantly small group", not sure what you base that conclusion on.

"That group does not rule the world of lexicography."
Correct. We don't have any desire to rule the world of lexicography.
We'll leave that up to professional communicators like yourself.
People who use terms like "tiny world", "Humpty-Dumptyism", "eccentric definitions", "insignificantly small" to refer to people.
 

lawcch

Involved In Discussions
#26
Calibrated is when is sent to be adjusted in the calibration shop, verified is when measurements obtained are compared
Against some references (gauges) without the need to send instruments to the calibration shop for verification.
The verification Is an activity to be sure Instruments at still able to give the right measurements.
yes, verification activity should be checked when we want to know the working device has the same accuracy as the reference calibrated device. Whereas the calibration task is refer to sending your working measuring device to metrology centre or metrology lab for external calibration which has higher accuracy measurement at least 5 x to 10 x depending on your own requirements or client needs
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C What kind of information you provide when conducting QMS Orientation? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
M What kind of instrument that must be calibrated? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
I What kind of wine best complements the Friday that you close out your external audit findings? Opinions are welcome. Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 12
L Document review is a kind of verification? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
A Why I get a different kind of regression equation when I do the same data in a differ Using Minitab Software 7
C IATF 16949 : 2016 - How put in place a Containment for this kind of Major NC IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
T Is Sorting a kind of Rework? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R What kind of Objective Evidence - AS9100 Cl. 7.1.6 - Organizational Knowledge AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Mixed Reality - What kind of possibilities can you imagine? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
J What kind of Tool and Gauge in IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.1.6? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
V What kind of audit for a production transfer? Internal Auditing 3
A What kind of test is described in subclause 56.3(c) of IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
J What kind of beauty/skin products should 20-25 year olds use Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
N This is my kind of flow chart ;) Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 5
W What kind of data is expected for a PPAP Material Analysis Report IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
D Template for the kind of naming convention on my test setup Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K What kind of people are suitable for Quality Management? Career and Occupation Discussions 12
J What kind of a visual aid is this? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
H What kind of training would you recommend to start on the process improvement world? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 8
Marc Interrupted Sleep Might Be the Best Kind Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
V What kind of Data should support Fit/Function Characteristics? APQP and PPAP 1
D What kind of ISO 14000 do I have to use on this Company? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 9
E What kind of questions will you ask on a quality quiz? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 8
J Which kind of medical equipment must comply with IEC60601-1-8? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
B What kind of insulin syringe is this for? ISO 8537:2007 Section 8, Table 1 Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M FMEA for Drilling Process - What kind of failure can happen during drilling process? FMEA and Control Plans 8
N ISO Standards Applicable to Our Kind of Work? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
K Are Withdrawal and Recall a kind of Control of Nonconformity? Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 5
Y Halogen Free - What kind and type of plastic resins contain Halogen? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 3
P Is a Production Plan a kind of Document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Jim Wynne My Kind of Job Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 3
D What kind of DMR must a Medical Importer have? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 8
J Kind of Changes that affect the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
J Internal Auditor Training - How much training and what kind of training Internal Auditing 18
S Which kind of document is the Quality Policy? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 42
S What kind of certification do we need in our medical equipment company? World News 11
W What kind of materials should I prepare for passing ISO IEC 60601-1-4 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
A APQP and Food Products - Applying APQP to the production of a new kind of milk APQP and PPAP 3
S Strategy for implementation Lean Six Sigma - What kind of research? Six Sigma 4
G What kind of documents shall be prepared by a Multidisciplinary approach? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
H No Final Inspection - Can this kind of a policy meet ISO 9001 requirements? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
L What kind of Gage R&R is needed for a Pull Test Machine? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
I Appearance Approval Report (AAR) - For what kind of product is AAR applicable? APQP and PPAP 5
E Machine Set-Up Sheets for More Than One Kind of Equipment FMEA and Control Plans 15
SteelMaiden What kind of corrective action is this? Lead based paint in childrens' toys Nonconformance and Corrective Action 13
Q Improvement Initiatives - what kind of meetings or activities are relevant? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
F Help: What kind of doc is this and that? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
S What is IMDS? Does Any kind of other thing other then four wheel manufacturing? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 3
ScottK Realistically - What kind of DPMO and sigma for a $5.00 part? Six Sigma 30
Jen Kirley A rather different kind of Union story World News 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom