SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

What results of a design review are documented in a DHF?

P

pheuvelmans

#1
What results of a design review are documented in a DHF, as they shall be used in medical device industry, to be FDA compliant?
Should all comments, issues which are made by the reviewers, be documented, or is the modified and committed / approved document, which is reviewed, sufficient?
Who can help me out?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
pheuvelmans said:
What results of a design review are documented in a DHF, as they shall be used in medical device industry, to be FDA compliant?
Should all comments, issues which are made by the reviewers, be documented, or is the modified and committed / approved document, which is reviewed, sufficient?
Who can help me out?
According to 21CFR820.30(e) in part:
The results of a design review, including identification of the design, the date and the individual(s) performing the review shall be documented in the DHF.
That is what is required. If you have minutes of a meeting or another document that includes these three items, that is what you need to comply.
 
P

pheuvelmans

#6
So no individual comments needed?

Thanks Al for your reply.:)
So may I conclude that the total list of individual comments from each single reviewer is not needed, according to the FDA?

What we currently use, is:
1) The document to be reviewed;
2) The updated document as a result of the review (with a notification about the review in the document history part)
3) A review report.
4) a defect list, listing all individual comments.

So the defect list is not needed to be stored in the DHF?

Pierre
 

Al Rosen

Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
pheuvelmans said:
Thanks Al for your reply.:)
So may I conclude that the total list of individual comments from each single reviewer is not needed, according to the FDA?

What we currently use, is:
1) The document to be reviewed;
2) The updated document as a result of the review (with a notification about the review in the document history part)
3) A review report.
4) a defect list, listing all individual comments.

So the defect list is not needed to be stored in the DHF?

Pierre
Is this a design review of a new project or is this a review for a change to an existing device? There are other considerations.
 
P

pheuvelmans

#8
It is a design review of a new release of a software package, which is being built in into a medical device.
The design is extended with new functionality.

Hope this helps!

Regards,

Pierre
 
A

andi11

#10
I believe problems and issues that come up during design review need to be resolved, closed and be part of design review doc and added to DHF.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
K Taguchi Experiments for Factorial Design Analysis - Reliability of Minitab Results Using Minitab Software 1
C Performance Test Results - for TESTS or for REQUIREMENTS specifiied in Design Record? APQP and PPAP 3
D Special 510k - Data Results of the Design Verification and Validation Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
T IATF 16949 Recording inspection results IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
E Raw data retention for Diagnosis Results EU Medical Device Regulations 4
lanley liao How to understand this words that the planning of internal audit shall take into consideration the results of previous audits? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
Nihls When the MSA results show no operator influence Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
Q IATF audit - Root Cause Analysis results IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
P Ppk results shown as asterisk after the transformation of Non-normal data Using Minitab Software 4
A MSA results differences - Supplier results vs. My results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
J Audit Finding For Not Retaining Test Results ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
F ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the validity of results - Threshold ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
P AS9102 Form 3 Dimension Results Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
H Graphical analysis of results - Confidence level bands nomenclature Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
G What information to put on measurement Dimensional Results APQP and PPAP 7
A Calibration Certificate Results General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
F Measurement Audit and ILC for ISO 17025 Clause 7.7.2 - Comparison with results of other laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
KCalaba21 ISO 9001:2015 6.2.2 E - "e) how the results will be evaluated." ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
S AS9100D PEAR - Examples for organization's method for determining process results? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
shimonv Referring to previously submitted biocompatibility results in a new 510(k) submission Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
J ISO 17025 - Please share a sample procedure for monitoring the validity of results ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
A Acceptance p-value for linearity and bias analysis in minitab results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
Marc European universities dismal at reporting results of clinical trials - 2019 Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
T Final process capability results - What I am supposed to present? Cp and CpK? APQP and PPAP 11
V Recording CMM dimensional results on CFG-1003 APQP and PPAP 3
Prashant G AS9100 Requirement - Verification of characteristics results with drawing requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 13
A Supplier Audit Results - when do you prepare? General Auditing Discussions 10
U ISO 17025:2017 Clause 7.7 Ensuring the Validity of Calibration Results ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
M FDA News FDA Safety communication – Interim Results of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Studies Conducted in Real-World Settings Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
A Definition Intended Results - What does "Intended Results" mean? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 4
G ANOVA GR&R: Minitab vs AIAG MSA results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
G ISO 9001:2015 - Management Review 9.3.2 c) 5) - Monitoring and Measurement Results ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
R Tensile Test Strain Rate - Impact on the Test Results Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
B How to interpret Grindometer Gage R&R Results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
J What results need to be defined in IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
C Leveraging previous results in IQOQs - Environmentally Controlled Room 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
W MR Inputs (9.3.2) - "Monitoring and Measurement Results" vs. "Process Performance" Management Review Meetings and related Processes 8
S Is it mandatory to provide the results of the validation report in handwriting? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ajit Basrur CDRH Customer Satisfaction Results at 87% US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
T Results from conducting a Capability Studies Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
V CMQ/OE exam results - March 7 2015 Professional Certifications and Degrees 10
W Results of the ASQ CSSBB Exam March 07 2015 Professional Certifications and Degrees 62
T OES Global Results Drift Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
Ron Rompen Quick question on results of Student-t test Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
G Interpreting Type 1 MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
L Release of Audit Results Report to 3rd Party ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
M ANOVA for S/N ratio gives different results Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
V Analysing Results after DOE Using Minitab Software 1
B Tolerance Calculator Based on R&R Results Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom