What to audit against clause 6.4 of ISO 9001:2000

M

M Greenaway

#1
What to audit against clause 6.4 of ISO9001:2000

Can anyone tell me what to audit against clause 6.4 of ISO9001:2000 which states 'The organisation shall determine and manage the work environment needed to achieve conformity to product requirements'.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

JodiB

Still plugging along
#2
Is there a harassment policy in place (and enforced?) Are the working conditions suitable for the climate? Are physical discomforts reasonably accommodated?

Ex. In a manufacturing business operating in the South where temps exceed 100F, is airconditioning provided for office workers? If airconditioning the manufacturing facility is impractical or too expensive, how are you managing the heat? Perhaps by providing cold water coolers, giving the workers more frequent breaks where they can enter a small airconditioned area of the plant, by rotating workers from the parts of the process that are the most heat intensive into other work areas that are less heat intensive, by providing industrial fans.....

Outside of the physical comforts and discomforts, there are the emotional aspects as well, which the harassment policy would speak to, as well as generally providing an open atmosphere that encourages participation and cooperation.

Anything that the employee encounters during his day, in trying to perform his job to his best capability can be considered "environment".
 
#3
work environment auditing

I hate to do this, but I kinda take this similar to QS 4.9.b.1. Cleanliness of Premises “The supplier shall maintain premises in a state of order, cleanliness and repair appropriate to the products(s) manufactured.”

I would expect an IC chipmaker to have a different work environment than a grinding operation.

A different take could also include the working ambiance. An “I hate you, you hate me” atmosphere is hardly conducive to manufacturing good product.

I think the first is the closer to what was meant, but if we want an effective system, we might have to expand the definition.
 
M

M Greenaway

#4
Really !!

So if an employee is in the slightest bit disgruntled with anything I should raise a corrective action ?

I thought the standard was talking about the environment needed to achieve product conformity. I know that could mean almost anything, but shouldnt we be more interrested in direct product related environments. i.e. if you are making ice cubes in the sahara desert you need a temperature controlled factory.

Anyway the statement in the standard doesnt ask you to consider the effectiveness - just that the environment is determined and managed. Wouldnt that be natural. Or might you work for a company that makes things but hasnt realised that it hasnt got a factory ??!!

I know this sounds stupid, but so does this clause.
 
J

Jim Biz

#5
Interesting Question

First thoutht is that "it depends"

>It depends entirely on what the product is.......

A manufacturing facility (as most all could ) - can use cleanliness> as a major criteria. Air quality (parts per million particles being put into the workplace due to machine moisture/smoke escaping. I Would think Noise levels should be managed. Possibly egronomic issues (are there/should there be lifting devices available for over xx pounds - etc.)

A plating facility would have different criteria > special storage for chamicals comes to mind.


A pure service facility (insurance company/distribution facility) would have different criteria for work environment factors.

Inspection labs > not only controlled documented tempratures but could push the issue - clear down to earth vibration effects management
 
E

energy

#6
My guess

When you look at the guidelines, it's "shoulds" include ergonomics, safety rules and guidance-including the use of protective equipment, facilities for people, workplace location, heat, humidity, light, vibration, pollution, social interaction?:eek: Why can't we all just get along? But the standard says: Determine and manage the work environment needed to achieve conformity to product requirements. To me, it may mean that an Auditor may see your process and request to see any Safety/Environmental procedures related to that process. That's scary. Being the facilty safety/environmental manager here, I just don't have to worry about following the normal Quality procedures. If I were an Auditor, the first thing I would ask to see the training records for those employees trained in Hazard Communication. This is a required written program for all companies with over 25 employees. Then I would ask to see forklift driver permits and the training program for them. I would ask to see the OSHA required daily maintenance checklist for those powered industrial trucks. Mandatory. Then I would ask to see all the daily overhead cranes/hoists checklists. Most companies have hoists with chains or slings. There are more, but they are industry specific. If you enter tanks, like we do here, you need a Written Confined Space Program. If the employees have to wear respirators, you must have a Written Respirator Program with physical examinations and madatory fit testing for the users. You ask to see those records. If they are seen wearing a respirator without medical clearance (evidence), you're in deep doo doo. And these people aren't even OSHA.:frust: I dread it. JMHO Pwew!:ko: :smokin:
 
M

M Greenaway

#7
Or is this the old preventive maintenance clause of the 1994 standard, so watered down it is now unrecognisable and totally meaningless ?
 
M

M Greenaway

#8
Energy are you saying that a quality audit will transform into a health and safety audit at this clause ?

I think not, we are talking about effects on product conformity, not employee health and safety. Important issues granted but a totally different kettle of fish (which you might like to stick your rod in :vfunny: ).
 
E

energy

#9
Uh Huh

Originally posted by M Greenaway
Or is this the old preventive maintenance clause of the 1994 standard, so watered down it is now unrecognisable and totally meaningless ?
No, that's in 6.3.:biglaugh:

Do you have a copy of the Guidelines-ANSI/ASQ 9004-2000? It's all in there as "should consider". That pretty much points out the direction the standard is coming from. If an employee can run over another employee with a powered industrial vehicle, or plow into product, it sure does affect the work environment. If a hoist cable snaps and cause injury to personnel or damage to product, that also can affect the work environment. All I'm saying is that I interpret it to mean the Auditor has more ammunition for findings related to the work environment. Lucinda's reference to REDACTED Harassment (we grade it here):vfunny: isn't far fetched when you look at "social interaction". Bloodborne Pathogen programs for people who may administer CPR. (AIDS):( I hope I'm wrong. But, for now, I don't see it any other way.
:ko: :smokin:
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#10
just MHO

OK---I feel the need to jump in on this...

But let me say first, that i don't know jack about the new standard, and I hope my company abandons (sp) the whole ISO charade before our cert expires....so here I go....

What is ISO9k...any version. It is a QUALITY system standard. Subjects such as REDACTED harrasment policies, HazMat communication programs, safety issues, etc. are already well covered by the applicable overseeing governmental agencies (i.e. EEO, OSHA, EPA, etc., etc., etc.). So why can't we stick to the issue at hand. The requirements are for an enviroment to assure product conformity. I agree with Jim's view, that it depends on the enviroment. But to include things such as REDACTED harrasment policies and issues of temperature (where temperature does not effect product) is ridiculus (sp). Unless the goal is to squeeze out all the little guys because we don't have the resources to keep on top of these issues when they are already covered in other areas (as they should be).

Ok...off the box for now.

CarolX
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
dubrizo Audit Findings: Writing against Internal an ISO Clause Internal Auditing 10
K How do you audit past verbal approvals against ISO 9001 Clause 4.2.3a? Internal Auditing 69
D Customer Audit Finding against ?where appropriate? of ISO 9001, Clause 7.4.2 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
B Evaluation of Service Supplier - Third party audit NC against clause 7.4.1 General Auditing Discussions 6
J ISO 13485 Audit Nonconformance written against 6.3 Infrastructure ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 25
W Minor Audit Nonconformance Against Determining the scope of QMS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
GStough Have You Had to Write a NC Against a Quality Manual in a Supplier Audit? General Auditing Discussions 12
Manix Should a 3rd Party Auditor Audit against IATF rules and not just the ISO standard? General Auditing Discussions 4
G Audit Finding against ISO/TS 16949 6.2.2 Competence, Training and Awareness IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
D ISO/TS 16949 Stage 2 Audit Nonconformance Against 7.6.3.1 Laboratory Scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
S Process Audit against different jobs (but part of the same process) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
D PPAP Audit Checklist to Audit our PPAP?s against the Current Process APQP and PPAP 7
L Root Cause - Analysis and Defining - A/R against 8.2.2 Internal Audit Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 12
B Purchasing Element Audit Checklist to audit against ISO 9001 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
T COVID, Furlough and ISO9001 Surveillance Audit Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
R External Audit and Certificate prorogation due to the pandemic General Auditing Discussions 10
Dean Bell Implementation of Controls as per SOA for Stage 2 Audit IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
G Logistic organization and controls - IATF/ISO 9001 audit Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
Geoff Cotton Performing a Delta Audit General Auditing Discussions 12
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G MSA check list to audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
L Open Positions During AS9100 Audit AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
L Stage 2 audit - Requirement for 3 months of records ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
F Who can sit in/perform an API audit? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
L Manufacturing Process Audit Help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
H AS9100 Checklist for Internal Audit needed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 4
F Internal Audit before Pre-Assessment ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Q Internal audit plan template Internal Auditing 5
G Self Assessment Audit from a new potential customer General Auditing Discussions 3
L Internal audit during COVID-19 restrictions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M OEM asking for NC report after certification audit. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Ooi Yew Jin Customer E audit preparation Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 2
N Audit non-compliance API Q1 - Use of External Documents 4.4.4 in Product Realization Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 4
J Remote Audit Experiences - June 2020 General Auditing Discussions 26
F Product audit sampling plans IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
O ISO13485 implementation - Are internal audits expected before stage 1 audit? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
M Supplier Audit Report - Template for second party audit wanted Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
Stefan Mundt AS9100D Major nonconformity due to recurrence of a NC during a subsequent CB audit. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q ISO 9001:2015 man days for surveillance audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
F ISO 13485 - EU countries that could request another audit ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
H Layered audit updates after COVID-19 shutdowns Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 0
L How to deal with an ISO 13485 Supplier Audit nonconformance ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
M Description of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.3 manufacturing process audit- needs your feedback IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Armen Conflict of Interest if I audit the QC department? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
V Generic IATF 16949 Audit Checklist wanted IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A NB (Notified Body) Audit of Standards ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
N Audit non-compliance - API Spec Q1 9th Ed 5.6.1.2 b Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
M Any way to execute VDA 6.3 audit remotely? VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom