What's wrong with this Shaft OD Gage R&R



Please advice what's wrong with this gage R&R.
Customer requested us to show gage R&R study for pins/shafts we produce, so we carried out whole procedure according to MSA Reference Manual.
O.D is important characteristic for them and we are measuring it by Transameter.
We selected 10 samples and asked 3 operator to measure each part 3 times. All results are in drawing tolerance and they are close each other. Spec is 0.039 and Transameter precision is 0.001. R&R we calculated 69%. We tried with another samples and also result is very high. Can anybody help? I attached results in file


  • OD R&R A1-1719.pdf
    93.7 KB · Views: 204


Trusted Information Resource
I don't believe your equipment is precise enough to ever get a good rr number. You'll probably need something else. Good luck.


Forum Moderator
See attached file. First, don't be concerned by the slight differences in results. Your spreadsheet uses the Xbar/R method, while I used the ANOVA method, so differences are expected.

Your gage resolution is fine. There are 8 measurement increments within the UCL_R versus a minimum requirement of 5, and you only have one zero range vs. a maximum of 25%.

I see two issues that would allow you to make some improvements.

The first issue is the differences in repeatability by operator. Look at the R Chart by Operator (outlined in red). The first operator has a consistently high repeatability vs. the last operator which has a consistently lower repeatability. I recommend studying the differences between these operators and standardizing the measurement method used by the last operator.

The second issue is the Operator by Part interaction. Notice that certain parts (outlined in green) are measured consistently the same by all operators while others (outlined in amber) are measured differently by each operator.

This is often caused by a variation in form in the part or a defect such as a burr that is detected by one measurement method and ignored by a different method. An example of this is an oval shaft. One operator may take a single measurement at random. Therefore, the measurement variation would include variation caused by the ovality. Another operator may search for the max and min measurements then average them, which removes this variation from the results. The green parts would be expected to have less variation in form (or fewer defects) than the amber parts.


  • Elsmar RandR.pdf
    88.5 KB · Views: 165
Last edited:


Stop X-bar/R Madness!!
Trusted Information Resource
Did you mark the parts and measure the same location? If not you may pick up roundness or taper - which is not the fault of the measuring device and should not be considered an intrinsic error of the gage. Also, does the process variation presented to the gage R&R (in your samples) represent the true variation over time? I find using historical process variation (AIAG MSA 4th edition bottom of page 121) a much more realistic evaluation.


Thank all of you for help and analyzing my data. I agree. Difference in measuring results might be caused by variation in form (ovality, roundness). These parts are produced by CNC machine (very repeatable and precise) and outside diameter as a parameter is important for customer while it doesn't say anything about shape. Although we do not check ovality during process, for this case we did it and measured several parts. Ovality is not significant and this is the range of few microns but considering gage discrimination it is measurable. Comparing to tolerance is almost nothing. So, I understand that results in R&R are mainly caused by variation in shape. We "trust" appraisers. In this case how can I convince customer that this measuring system is OK? Shall we mark parts and let appraisers to measure at the sam point?


Trusted Information Resource
Whatever changes (improvements) you will implement during analysis, you have to implement in serial production conditions. I would drop this system, but maybe I am too pessimistic.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B AMS2750 Secondary Instrument, what am I doing wrong? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
Q Where did my Alignment go wrong? MCOSMOS Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
B Wrong standard deviation calculation in AIAG SPC manual? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 13
L Does a backdate form format can be changed if wrong revision is used? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
G Gage R&R - Where am I going wrong? Part of a FAIR submission (Aerospace) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
Richard Regalado What could go wrong with information: Ransomware statistics and facts (2018 to present) IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
L PPM - wrong parts or defective parts? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
Ed Panek ISOTECH TTI-10 found out of calibration - Calibration house was wrong? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
N How to ensure our employees don’t grab and use the wrong materials Manufacturing and Related Processes 11
Marc Quality (Industry) 4.0 - What could possibly go wrong? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
M Benchmarking Process Data - Man-day calculation gone wrong Benchmarking 5
S Definition Would a wrong definition constitute an Audit Finding? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 3
kedarg6500 Gage R&R - Is my sheet calculation wrong? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 21
L Color measurements R&R: what's wrong with white? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
M What if information in predicate 510k is obviously wrong? Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
D Root Cause Analysis done on the wrong observation Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 9
L How to document use of wrong engineering drawing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 22
C FMEA DOGMA about Severity - Am I right or Wrong? FMEA and Control Plans 2
M Even the ASQ got it wrong, the Kano model Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
P What can go wrong in a Construction Project - NCRs in Construction Industry Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Jim Wynne APQP, or Why Things Always Go Wrong APQP and PPAP 0
B Does the recording of wrong entries amount to a nonconformity? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 7
J Stacked Line Chart - Am I using the wrong chart for the job? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
T Preventing Wrong Terminal Crimped on a Wire Harness Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Q What's wrong with my data? MSA result showed very high % R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
Rameshwar25 MSA Manual 4th Edition, Page 100 - What is wrong in the Linearity graph? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
Y P chart - wrong equations? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
bobdoering Capability Calculations: Are AIAG SPC Appendix F Conclusions Wrong? Imported Legacy Blogs 5
Marc Newsweek admits how wrong they were about the internet After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 5
Ajit Basrur Chilean mint spells country's name wrong on coins Nonconformance and Corrective Action 8
bobdoering Dr Wheeler weighs in on "Individual Charts Done Right and Wrong" Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
M Requirements for Changing Documentation to correct typos or wrong word selection Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 15
P How to prevent the LED wrong polarity when insertion on the production line? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 8
Marc SANS Report Says Organizations Focusing On the Wrong Security Threats After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
M How do you identify the wrong orientation in complex wiring harness? Manufacturing and Related Processes 21
E Identification of out-of-process parts - Using the wrong tag Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
C FDA delaying notification of receipt of 510(k)'s - What wrong with FDA? - China US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
R WRONG Use of P-Chart Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
BradM What's wrong with this picture? Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 10
P Device Master Record requirements - wrong approach? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Wrong material Ordered - Which Procedure and Form is relevant? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
Jim Wynne Fish Pedicure--I must be in the wrong business Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 9
B Is Minitab technical support answer 2255 wrong? Using Minitab Software 5
L Corrective action following a wrong answer of the auditee ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
P First ISO13485 accreditation audit: What are things that can go wrong? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M Wrong Calibration / Verification Result - Height gauge IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Wes Bucey Oops! Opportunity for mistake proofing? Worker flicks wrong switch World News 14
N TGR (Things Gone Right) & TGW (Things Gone Wrong) reports - Seeking form or checklist Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
Marc 'Wrong site' surgeries and other mistakes on the rise World News 15
W Mr. Ford's Wrong Turn - Why U.S. Automakers Can't Blame Japan World News 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom