SBS - The best value in QMS software

When do you say that you are ready for Third-Party Certification?

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#51
Here's my view: No I don't need to check to see if your underwear is dirty. I could just take your word for it. But if Jim, James, and Tonya ALSO tell me your underwear isn't dirty, then now I have more confidence that you are not full of poop, nor is your underwear.

I guess what I'm getting at, is the point of a certification is to provide your customers with faith in your system so that they DON'T have to come audit your company. Most companies are not seeking new vendors and without a cert, especially in the aerospace industry where you frequently deal with military contracts, you will never get your foot in the door...
A good auditor does much more than "check whether your underwear is dirty..." An outdated way of looking at certification benefits.

Good auditors will often point out areas that are not as good as they can be. A good auditor has seen hundreds of examples of systems. That is a degree of perspective few people get, and one I value very much. How many people do you regularly talk with who have seen hundreds of systems intimately? It is a unique opportunity to cross-pollinate and improve paradigms. The standard gives good concepts, ISO 9004 adds a lot more great stuff (everyone should read it!), and a good auditor adds icing on the cake. Of course, he/she also has to watch they don't cross over into consulting. But, money well spent if done right.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#52
Hi guys!

I have three concerns that I hope you will be able to help me on with, as follows:

a. As the title of my thread says, when do you say that a company is really ready for the Third-Party audit?

b. What does the 3-month minimum implementation of the system means? 3-months of generated records?

c. Given a scenario as follows: Our company already have the Quality Manual and Mandatory Procedures in place (approved) last March...then we had our internal audit last April...last May we had our Management Review...then we just had our Operational Procedures approved 2 weeks ago (June)...our OTPs were also approved 2 weeks ago also...sounds funny? It is...with these, can you say that our company is ready for audit this July or even August? Please advice.

Thanks :lol:
Onayt,

When your competent internal auditors provide you with evidence that your system conforms, your system is ready for the certification audit and not before.

Do not ask the third party auditor if your system conforms. Tell them it does and that you have the evidence that it does.

Focus on evidence instead of time periods.

Ensure that you establish and maintain the confidence of your third party auditor in your system's conformity and effectiveness. Do not start the relationship with doubt by asking if it conforms.

John
 

MajorBVNaik

Involved In Discussions
#54
A stage 1 audit has clear limitations and is not designed to assess implementation aspects.
Many organizations suffer from wishful thinking when developing their command media, procedures, documents, process instructions and "design" processes that are not achievable at that stage. So, document-wise, the system is in great shape. But very little is actually implemented.

A very common failure mode, during stage 2 audits, is the scenario where the actual work/practice is not in line with the supporting documentation. It happens all the time.
Stage 1 audit success need not necessary guarantee success during stage 2 audit. Stage 1 audit focuses on documentation review (adequacy of QM), checks that internal audit & management review has been conducted. It is also meant for ensuring that planning for stage 2 audit meets requirements
 
J

JaneB

#55
Stage 1 audit focuses on documentation review (adequacy of QM), checks that internal audit & management review has been conducted. It is also meant for ensuring that planning for stage 2 audit meets requirements
:nope: Not fully correct. You're paraphrasing in your own words and giving an opinion, rather than accurately stating what the certifying bodies are actually required to do in the Stage 1.

For example, it is not correct to say this:
checks that internal audit & management review has been conducted.
Nope, not true. (If you're going to single out those 2 things, why not single out every other requirement as well and say that those have to be checked as well? Which they don't at Stage 1)

You've also left out some things.
 
O

Onayt

#56
Hey guys, I'm back

Guess what? Our company is certified at last!!! thanks to your advices..it really helped me a lot...i was assigned as the Management Representative barely a month prior to the Stage 2 Audit...finally, my sleepness nights paid off!!!

=)
 
O

Onayt

#57
Hi Jane,

Im happy to inform you that we are already certified as of Sep 23, 2010...thank God it all paid off!!!

Thanks for the advices!

Regards,
Onayt
 
T

tbsiva

#58
Hi guys!

I have three concerns that I hope you will be able to help me on with, as follows:

a. As the title of my thread says, when do you say that a company is really ready for the Third-Party audit?

b. What does the 3-month minimum implementation of the system means? 3-months of generated records?

c. Given a scenario as follows: Our company already have the Quality Manual and Mandatory Procedures in place (approved) last March...then we had our internal audit last April...last May we had our Management Review...then we just had our Operational Procedures approved 2 weeks ago (June)...our OTPs were also approved 2 weeks ago also...sounds funny? It is...with these, can you say that our company is ready for audit this July or even August? Please advice.

Thanks :lol:
Simple answer is yes. I don't find that something is missing to go for the audit. But apart from completing these activities, check the real system effectiveness before you go for the audit.

Thanks :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
J

JaneB

#59
Hi Jane,

Im happy to inform you that we are already certified as of Sep 23, 2010...thank God it all paid off!!!

Thanks for the advices!

Regards,
Onayt
Thrilled to hear it. Great stuff - well done you and all who helped. ANd thanks a lot for letting us know.
 
D

Drew G

#60
Hey guys, I'm back

Guess what? Our company is certified at last!!! thanks to your advices..it really helped me a lot...i was assigned as the Management Representative barely a month prior to the Stage 2 Audit...finally, my sleepness nights paid off!!!

=)

Congratulations Onayt!


Keep us posted.


Drew
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Design History File - Not ready to share the design drawings or Bill of Material US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
Ajit Basrur How do I label this commercial product ready for clinical study? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
T Series A ready company - Term for medical devices companies? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
K Everybody ready for round 2? Our next audit is in late January IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
S When will notified bodies be ready to perform audit to the MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
P Getting ready for Boeing's AC7130 requirement for suppliers using a CMM AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
L Printing Machine Make Ready Rapid Changeover Case Study Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
A 6S 5 Minute Audit Sheet to guage if a Workspace is Safe and Ready to Go Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
M So you want an internet ready car? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 3
Marc Sunday Morning Cartoon - Ready, Woolen and Able Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1
T If we are not meeting our Quality Objectives are we ready for ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 29
P Am I ready to call auditor? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 37
L AS9100 Rev C. - Not ready yet (January 2010) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 18
V Identification of Operational Prerequisite Programs (oPRP) for ready to eat products Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
T Time to get ready... Imported Legacy Blogs 2
J Getting Employees Ready for TS 16949 Registration Audit - Training Materials IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
C RC14001 - Are we ready for a Baseline (Pre-Assessment) Audit? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 11
Jim Wynne London is ready for some (American) football Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 23
Wes Bucey Ready to send your donation? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
B Deployment of an "ISO9000-ready" QMS - Multi-facility site ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
T Survey - What is the demand of Pre-written/ready-to-use calibration procedures? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 14
A Seeking advice about what I have to do before we're ready for a certification audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
H Gage manufacturer is not ready to give guarantee for 10% R&R for the new gages Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
J External third party audits Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
S Would this be a second site for the purposes of internal and third party audits? General Auditing Discussions 4
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
A Looking for a third party to calibrate our measure equipment - South Carolina General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
F Firmware as SOUP - Sensor with third party produced firmware IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
Marc Medical device vulnerability highlights problem of third-party code in IoT devices Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
R UDI for US - Third Party device Repackager Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
S QUALITY OBJECTIVEs for third party garments factory inspection ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
M Looking for third party reviewers for FDA submissions US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
S Regulatory strategy for Third party plugin in a PACS EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational US FDA – URGENT/11 Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in a Widely-Used Third-Party Software Component May Introduce Risks During Use of Certain Medical Dev Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
G Third party auditor mentions no grace period for calibration Calibration Frequency (Interval) 22
M Informational EU – DEKRA Certification GmbH is the third Notified Body designated under the MDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Updated US FDA Resources for Third Party Review Organizations Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Rameshwar25 Min working experience for IATF 16949 third party auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Medical Device News FDA - Eliminating Routine FDA news 14-09-18 - Re-Review of Third Party 510(k) Reviews Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
Anerol C Becoming an IATF 16949 Third Party Auditor Career and Occupation Discussions 12
K Tips for dealing with third party auditors General Auditing Discussions 11
M Forced NOT to meet End Customer Expectations - Corrupt Third World Country ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M AS9102 Training - Seeking third party agency that provides online AS9102 training AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
J One third of the total audit days on manufacturing (TS 16949) General Auditing Discussions 2
A Creating a policy to evaluate the Third Party Security IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
R (OOT) Measurement Equipment after the calibration at a third Party lab General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
R Medical Device Cyber Security Third Party Review Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
L Medical Device Installation Records from Third Party Installer 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S Temporary Facility Used For Production - Use of existing Third Party Logos ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
B Third Party Service Provider Risk Rating Spreadsheet Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom