Which NAVLAP or A2LA Laboratory Accreditation Body?

F

Fatboy

Can anyone tell me which accreditation body (NAVLAP or A2LA) is the best bang for the buck? Is one better/easier to work with?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

D.Scott

First of all, welcome to the Cove. It is nice to see another representative from the Lone Star State.

In my opinion, I think you need to put your own bang in your buck. The degree to which you benefit from a good system is entirely up to you. Both the bodies you mention are supposedly impartial in their accreditation and neither would be able to consult on your system.

The A2LA is the older of the 2 and is probably more well known and might even give the perception of carrying more weight with your customers. NAVLAP is just as well respected by those who take the time to look into it but they are admittedly the newer. The real "new kid on the block" is LAB which I understand is also a very fine group. If you are speaking purely of a calibration lab/service there is also 2pCP through AIAG.

I think your bang will probably come through a well defined and maintained system and short of hiring a consultant, I can't think of a better place to get some answers than right here at the Cove. If you haven't spent the few dollars for membership, I would suggest it. You will get a lot more than the small cost in a very short time.

Good luck with your lab and once again, welcome.

Dave
 
J

jeffster

Dave,

I have heard stories where political squabbles have allowed companies which have been accredited by agencies other than A2LA (LAB) to not be recognized. I was told by one LAB operator that if they had a piece of equipment calibrated at a firm which was accredited by LAB, A2LA would not consider that equipment calibrated.

We are also trying to decide on which way to go with 17025 accreditation and I am curious as to what experiences others have had.

Thanks,

Jeff
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
Folks,

Time for some history.

The first accreditation in the U.S. predates both NVLAP and A2LA, issued by an AB known then as ICBO ES, now known as IAS. Yes, we are the oldest AB of our type in the country. First accreditation issued in 1975.

NVLAP came next, with A2LA close on its heels. That is the order of origination.

Numerous others are in the field now, including L-A-B. Jeffster is correct that A2LA is not obligated at this point to accept L-A-B cals, as L-A-B is not in a Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

As to which gives more bang for the buck or is easier to work with, I recommend you talk to all.....IAS, NVLAP, A2LA, L-A-B, ACLASS......ask each hard questions and request a quote that details estimated costs, rather than only looking at a fee schedule.

Hershal
 
K

Ken K

Jeff, you are correct. Our auditor, who works for both A2LA and LAB, discussed some of the political differences between the two off the record.

Two labs within our company are accredited by LAB and one by A2LA. We cannot do any ILC/PT with the A2LA lab because they will not recognize us as being accredited.

Personally, I am satisfied with LAB. They have been undergoing some growing pains recently, but nothing too serious. Shop around. It's your money and like Dave said, you do need to put your own bang in your buck.

Good luck.
 
T

tomvehoski

I have worked with A2LA, LAB and ACLASS with clients. This experience covers registrations from 2000 to 2003, so it may not all be current.

I found A2LA the most expensive and difficult to deal with. True, they do probably have the best name recognition, but you will pay for it. I was also left with the feeling that you work for them. For example, one client asked them to quote, then asked them to send in a representative for a presentation. We were told "A2LA does not do presentations. Send us your deposit check and we will set up a pre-assessment."

The same client also quoted L-A-B. They sent a VP in on two days notice to discuss the process, costs, etc. They were also much cheaper. An additional consideration is that LAB also partners with ISO registrars, so you may be able to save a few $$$ with a combined quote if you are also 9000, 16949, etc. It is also possible to do a combined audit, although it is difficult to find an auditor qualified in both 17025 and 9000 at times.

ACLASS is my most recent experience. They were also very willing to work with the client and cheaper than A2LA. They are new and don't have all that many registrations, but I would still recommend them. Let me know if you need any contact information - I talked to one of their VPs about a month ago.

As for the audits and auditors, I would say all were about the same. Good, fair auditors but strict on enforcing the standard and making you prove any exclusions.

It is important that you verify that your customers will accept LAB, ACLASS or other bodies certifications. The place I am with now is forced to use A2LA because we also carry a special electromagnetic compatability lab certification (GM standard) for which only A2LA is approved at the moment.

Hope this helps,

Tom
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
D.Scott said:
NAVLAP is just as well respected by those who take the time to look into it

NVLAP is the Cadillac AB in the U.S., and unfortunately the most expensive. However, they are the best. If you survive the assessment, you join an elite group.

The rest of us are lower cost, and each of us have our strong points, and weak points.

Questions I might suggest you ask each (IAS, A2LA, L-A-B, ACLASS) include:

1. Actual cost to be estimated in a quote, that includes assessor days based on scope, travel expenses, etc.

2. The AB's schedule, that is, how quickly can the AB serve you, assuming no big issues?

3. What staff person will personally handle your file, start to finish?

4. What are the policies on training, PT/ILC, measurement uncertainty, traceability?

These questions will get a very rough picture of the AB and the service one can expect.

Then ask existing clients of the AB. Download scopes and contact information from each, just a sample will do, then call and ask each how the service has been to them.

Then you get a more complete picture of how to select your AB. :)

Hershal
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
Thought I would throw one more into the mix, which is equally accepted by IAS, NVLAP, and A2LA.......

That is SCC/CLAS, our friends from Canada.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Do I need A2LA Accreditation? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
C Environmental Temperature Chamber Testing & A2LA requirements IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
D A2LA Certification and moving to a new Facility General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Q Adding to our A2LA Scope of Accreditation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
G A2LA's ISO/IEC 17025 and Accreditation Training - Opinions from previous attendees ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
QMMike TS 16949 - A2LA or ISO/IEC 17025 required for material testing? ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
S A2LA requirements for Electrical Uncertainty Budgets - Measurements with a slope Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
A ILAC explanation - IEC60601-1 testing certified by an A2LA laboratory IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
S Calibration of equipment in an A2LA accredited testing laboratory General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
E A2LA Proficiency Test Requirement help needed General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
O When do we need to be A2LA/ISO 17025 certified? ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
E A2LA Laboratory Management Requirements or Qualifications General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
M When can you be "accredited" and not be "accredited" with A2LA? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
S A2LA Calibration Program Requirements, September 2005 II. Section 2.1.3.b.3 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
gard2372 A2LA & ISO/IEC 17025:1999 vs. European Requirements ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
R AS7101 for Materials Testing - Is this similar to 17025 or A2LA? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
J A2LA vs. other accreditors General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
T Field Decay Test - Can any one recommend few independent and A2lA accredited labs? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
T Providing A2LA w/ Proficiency Test results General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
S Looking for company to calibrate cutting dies with A2LA, IAS, or NVLAP accreditation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
J A2LA here, my boss wants to open China office now General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Hershal A2LA has completely terminated involvement in NACLA General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
W ISO 17025 or A2LA, what?s this?? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
D If you are TS16949 certified, it also covers A2LA certification? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
S Labels identifying accredited standards - Considering making labels with A2LA Logo General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Maintaining and tracking laboratory voltage standards - A2LA audit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
V Is A2LA the US National equivalent to ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 9
D A2LA vs. NADCAP - Could someone explain the differences? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 17
Q Seeking: A2LA to ISO 17025 Audit Template ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
C Differences and similarities between ISO 17025 and A2LA certification? ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
K A2LA laboratory requirements General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
R 17025, guide 25, A2LA (cal.,meas.,antest) ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
L A2LA - Sending testing to a non-accredited lab if customer doesn't require A2LA? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Marc A2LA has a Traceability Policy that was issued 08/2000 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
D A2LA/ISO GUIDE 25 QUALIFIED LABS WITH FLOW CALIBRATION IN THIER SCOPE General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Marc APLAC - A2LA - ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 (1997) - 17025 - Laboratory Proficiency Testing ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
Marc NVLAP and A2LA Guide 25 Interpretations General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Marc NVLAP vs. A2LA - NVLAP policy on acceptance of calibration laboratories General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
Marc A2LA Contact and Guide 25 Comment - NOTE: Guide 25 is long since dead and buried General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
V PQ parameters for computer system validation of configurable software of laboratory equipment Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
F Laboratory intentionally skipped the Magnetic Field Immunity test IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
A Help required in establishing Laboratory Information Management System as per ISO 17025, Cl.7.11.2 ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
S Is design and development clause 8.3 applicable for laboratory ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
D Is Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Required in ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
D IATF16949 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
A Laboratory scope on the IATF IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J 7.1.3.5.2 External laboratory - CIPM MRA IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
W 7.1.5.3.2. External laboratory Sanctioned Interpretation IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
G Audit & Agreements for "Test Laboratory" Supplier? US Medical Device Regulations 4
D Laboratory Refrigerator Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom