Who should be the Document Controller?

Y

ykfoo

#1
Hi guys, I really need a 2nd opinion here. Who is the best person to resume the role of the document controller? What are the criteria of selecting the best person?

In my opinion it shouldn't be anyone, but an automated document control system... but until then the show needs to go on (manually, i.e. hardcopis manual and procedures). So who will be the best candidate to carry out this detail and tedious task. What are the selection criteria?

Kindly advise guys.

FYI, we are a corporate office set-up that provides services to our group of companies, which includes Accounting, Legal & Secretarial, Treasury, MIS, Admin & Property, Internal Audit and Engineering services.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
H

HFowler

#2
ykfoo,

In my opinion, the Management Representative, ISO Coordinator or Quality Assurance Manager usually controls such documents as the Quality Policy Manual, Procedures and any Master Lists, etc. Departmental Work Instructions, records, performance to measurable objectives, etc., could be kept by individual department managers. Engineering drawings, Sales Orders, Purchase Orders, Inspection Records and other controlled documents should be controlled by the relevant departments.

I have seen some large companies that have a staffed document control center.

Hope this helps.

Best Regards,
Hank Fowler
:)
 

gpainter

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
From my experiences, you could have more than one. The person(s) should be able to handle the pressure. One DC person I know had a breakdown from it. Experience with MS Word,Excel to create documents would be a plus, usually control also includes creation. Organization would be a plus also. Once the system is in place, the DC person will need about 8 hours per week to do the task and of course that will depend on the amount of documentation and the use of computer technology. Many places use a secretarial position for it.
 
R

Rick Goodson

#4
ykfoo,

In my experiences assisting ISO implementations I have found two things to be true. First, implementations where the Management Representative is not the quality manager, director, etc. usually have greater success in implementing, in a shorter time, and with more buyin. Second, document control works best when it is under the control of someone other than the Q person or the Management Representative. Same comment, better buyin results.

Regards,

Rick
 
#5
From my experiences, you could have more than one.
I think you probably *should* have more than one person running the show.

In my opinion, the Management Representative, ISO Coordinator or Quality Assurance Manager usually controls such documents as the Quality Policy Manual, Procedures and any Master Lists, etc. Departmental Work Instructions, records, performance to measurable objectives, etc., could be kept by individual department managers. Engineering drawings, Sales Orders, Purchase Orders, Inspection Records and other controlled documents should be controlled by the relevant departments.
I agree. That works reasonably well in most cases. Who owns the document? Let him or her control it...

/Claes
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#6
here's what we do

We have mutliple level of documents under different control. Myself, as the QA Manager/MR controls the "quality program" documents. Engineering controls blueprints and detailed work instructions. Human Resorces controls the employee handbook, etc., etc., etc.

One person should never be the keeper of all the documents. The owner should be the keeper.

CarolX
 
S

Silbil

#7
Another opinion

Where I used to work, I was QA Assistant and Document Controller. When it came to the documentation, I was the one liaising with staff, typing, drawing and formatting, and distributing docs, under the guidance of the Quality Manager.

(I was the centralised "publishing" person because most of the production staff hated writing etc, preferring getting on and doing their work, and the others either were hopeless writers and spellers, with the exception of a "would-be best-seller author" who would spend a whole day mulling over the appropriate use of the passive tense!!!!!!!! :frust: )

Anyhow, this had its advantages, since the QA Manager was also the QC Manager, and had an aura of "Ms Non-Conformance" about her. People were a bit frightened of approaching her, afraid of being "caught out", whereas with me, they were able to dialogue more, tell me when they had difficulty understanding the docs etc. Staff felt more (I think) that they "owned" the documents, rather than having them thrust upon them by "Ms ISO" (though that didn't prevent the barely audible "UUUUURGH Her again!" as I entered the workshop) :ko:

Anyway, that is just one case, I'm sure there are thousands to counter this.

Cheers

Silbil
 
#8
Re: Another opinion

Silbil said:

(I was the centralised "publishing" person because most of the production staff hated writing etc, preferring getting on and doing their work, and the others either were hopeless writers and spellers, with the exception of a "would-be best-seller author" who would spend a whole day mulling over the appropriate use of the passive tense!!!!!!!! :frust: )
I recognize that situation well... We seem to have very few future nobel literature prize winners in our organisation :vfunny:

[Anyhow, this had its advantages, since the QA Manager was also the QC Manager, and had an aura of "Ms Non-Conformance" about her. People were a bit frightened of approaching her, afraid of being "caught out", whereas with me, they were able to dialogue more, tell me when they had difficulty understanding the docs etc. Staff felt more (I think) that they "owned" the documents, rather than having them thrust upon them by "Ms ISO" (though that didn't prevent the barely audible "UUUUURGH Her again!" as I entered the workshop) :ko:
I recognize that part too... :vfunny:x2 Anyway, I think you gave an adequate description of a person suitable for the job

/Claes
 

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#10
i don't

gpainter said:

Carol X how do you control the master list ? Curious

gpainter,

I don't maintain a master list. With over 3000 parts in our system, we can't maintain a "master list" of all work instructions. And I am curious...why would you have a "master list"? What purpose does it serve?

Regards,
CarolX
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
A Removing purchase order form from document control - should it be done? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
G How should we document individual Support Processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
T Should a supplier self assessment form be a controlled document? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
R Should Internal Audit criteria be a Controlled Document? Internal Auditing 5
A PFMEA a 'Live' Document and should always have Open Actions FMEA and Control Plans 15
J What should be included in the Design Change Document 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
C When should an expired document be removed from use? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
R Who should document the Design Review Meeting and Design History File? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
T How much information should I keep in my Master Document Register? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
P ISO 14971 - Is it a guidance document or should we fully comply with it? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 14
S Should an auditor document potential nonconformities in the audit report? General Auditing Discussions 41
V Should the EMS manual be a controlled document? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 7
A Sale of Demonstration Units - How should we document it from GMP standpoint? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
I Quality should own document control - WHY is finance getting involved?? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
P TS16949 - Should specific process notes be considered a controlled document. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A The PFMEA is a living document - When should it be reviewed? FMEA and Control Plans 4
S What is a Desk Audit? What should I expect? A Document Review? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 82

Similar threads

Top Bottom