Who should define and own the Design and Development Plan and how to maintain the updates and revisions.

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#1
1. per my understanding, it should be owned by "project / program manager", and shall be defined in consultation with the key stakeholders ( viz., technical lead and regulatory etc); also certain references.,
https://alvintai.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Design-Control-SOP.docx

2. as these documents are alive and evolve with the product development, there are two options
a. to revise and version them through the life cycle. ( with appropriate change management/controls from set stage viz., D.Input can be updated without change control till Design Verification Plan; but any changes later should be put through formal change control)
b. to update through addendums, and integrate the details at a set milestone viz., for D.Input, integrate before Design verification.

per my understanding, 2.a is right choice. as per FDA's guidance.
https://www.fda.gov/media/116573/download
Eventually, the design input must be reviewed for adequacy. After review and approval, the design input becomes a controlled document. All future changes will be subject to the change control procedures, as discussed in Section I (Design Changes)
pl guide with clarification and reference
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
There's nothing prescriptive about who should "own" (or even approve) the Design & Development Plan. Obviously it should be coordinated with applicable stakeholders and generally the project manager is probably in a good position to do so - so the project manager is probably a good choice but not required.

I got a little lost on your second question. The Design & Development Plan is independent from the other documents (e.g., Design Inputs). The Design & Development Plan should, indeed, be updated as the project progresses. The means for update are not specified. Once approved, though, updates should (per basic Document Control requirements) be approved by the same roles that approved the original (there are a few caveats but that's the gist).

The question of when to put things under change control is always a difficult one to answer. To me, design inputs provide the foundation for the rest of the work so I push for the initial baseline (approval) early. Changes to the Design Inputs always have a ripple effect and if those aren't managed well, you can end up in chaos. If you're informally modifying design inputs, you could end up with developers going in the wrong direction.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#3
The question of when to put things under change control is always a difficult one to answer. To me, design inputs provide the foundation for the rest of the work so I push for the initial baseline (approval) early. Changes to the Design Inputs always have a ripple effect and if those aren't managed well, you can end up in chaos. If you're informally modifying design inputs, you could end up with developers going in the wrong direction.
Maybe straying off topic, however -

I think control over changes (in contrast with "change control") goes without saying on pretty much everything once you go under Design Control, which is normally when "research", "feasibility", "proof of concept", "market probing" and all that jazz ends (there should be a formal, documented cut-off). I couldn't agree more about Design Input changes. The really hard question (and one a lot of orgs are pondering) is when to start applying the regulatory element "Design Change", i.e. when to start applying the Design Change SOP or WI.

The approach I usually follow is: after the successful conclusion of the first Design Verification round (i.e. after its Design Review). If that round is unsuccessful (i.e. some design elements need changing, including possibly some design inputs) the design should still be considered "liquid", and the initial design development controls should suffice. I think this is important, so as to not over-encumber the initial design/engineering work with processes that consume resources, slow down progress and add little value overall.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MrPhish Should Potential Customer Complaint Outcome Define Registrar NC Rating? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
V Is there an approach to define the "must 'or' should" in supplier audits? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
T How should I define a process-The use of the Active Voice Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 14
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 67
N Should it even be on the hazard analysis (software)? FMEA and Control Plans 2
V Which batches should or could be considered for design validation and design verification? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
L A Taiwan company want to sell Class I medical device (510(k) exempt) on Amazon, should we register with FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
M Routine testing of medical electrical systems - What specific electrical safety tests should be performed? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
F Quality Objectives - Where in the QMS Quality Objectives should be located ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P ISO 80369-7 standard - Interpreting which Parts should be in scope Other Medical Device Related Standards 7
A How should the Medical Device OEMs be declared to ANVISA? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
D Should "Waste" be included as Output in SIPOC Chart? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 8
N Control plan evaluation methods - Which methods should be carried over from the PFMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 3
A PFMEA - How long should the recommended actions remain in the recommended actions column? APQP and PPAP 3
M Should Quality be an independent organization in aerospace company? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 25
S Should there be a SOP on Cybersecurity? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
B AS9102 FAI & Lower Level Drawings - How should we perform the FAI? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1
I Imaging Services - Which standard should we be certified to? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D Design FMEA for a component - Should I make the following assumptions? FMEA and Control Plans 7
M Medical Device News FDA's Policies and Procedures Should Better Address Postmarket Cybersecurity Risk to Medical Devices Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
M Who should have access to Audit trail? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 6
S Should an Initial Importer separately do Establishment Registration? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
J What Calibration Standards should I have? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
Hieupm Clause 8.5.5 and Clause 8.6: which one should be coming first? (ISO 9001:2015) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
shimonv Should the Label for Serviced Medical Devices be Replaced? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M IATF 16949 - Who should be assigned as the Product Safety Officer? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom