Why cars cost so much

G

Greg B

#11
In relative terms ($$$), I feel that cars are in fact cheaper and better equipped today than say...in the 70's...there was no power anything and everything was an optional extra, if in fact it even existed! A car is certainly less than a yearly salary as compared to the 70s..unless of course you want to go overboard and spend zillions on something that costs more than your house ~grin~
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

apestate

Quite Involved in Discussions
#12
The common cost of a car has not changed since 1993.

Adjust dollars to the level in 1993 and you will find the same prices, even though automakers have added plenty of creature comforts and refinements.

I question the idea that a car could be sold fairly for $5000. $8000, perhaps. Of course, you would have to adjust down for the bloat factor of fat lazy American antics and the finnick factor of the high quality specialists and adjust up for the absolute slave wage 3rd world horror show factor of Chinese manufacturing.

But why isn't it done? Daewoo and Kia seem like they don't want to stoop THAT low, at least not often. Probably they don't need to stoop low to make money any more and are starting to compete.

Therefore, a base Chinese auto, fiasco that it would be, would probably sell for $7000. Americans could absolutely give them **** with a base auto for $9000. But, it won't happen because nobody has a taste for sustainability and utility.

If a car was really designed well so that it could be produced for decades with a minimum of design changes, the common cost of a base auto would probably be very low. It would probably be very profitable, as well. The car could be designed for maintainability and the service around it designed for cost effective maintenance.

A non-disposable automobile.

But this will never happen. In 1993, people said everything would be robotic by 2010. Instead, the exact same machines are going slower because of safety devices, and the design of machines doesn't change unless you change it yourself.

So maybe in 2250 we'll see some intelligent work done across the board in manufacturing, but it probably won't be in automobiles. Automobiles will still be disposable crap--Except for Hondas and Toyotas.
 
T

TedCambron

#13
OK to waist money?

Interesting, It almost seems that there are those who beleive that it's O.K. to waist money processing cars.
It's O.K. to waist money because we should expect to pay more for power steering and air conditioning anyways.
It's O.K. to waist money because that's nothing compared to the cost of recalls.
It's ok to waist money because cars are are better priced per income than years ago.
Anybody working for Toyota or Honda want to help me out here?
 

apestate

Quite Involved in Discussions
#16
Get the scientists working on the tube technology.

The VW Beetle was a good car. The design lasted forever and it was simple and easy to maintain.

Learning from the problems had with it and the problem of keeping people interested, what prevents someone from building a modern non-disposable automobile?

Perhaps being somewhere at the start of on the cusp of a major shift in power source and power management, how would you handle this? Maybe a fuel cell can fit where the engine had to be in the hybrid design?

+
 
M

Murphys Law

#17
For the cost of servicing this industry, the price of cars should be higher...
WHAT ??? :mg:

The reason I say this it requires huge capital investment, has low returns and litigeousness associated with end consumer makes this business sector extremely unattractive. This in turn stiffles innovation and makes the car manufacturers an overly conservative industry.

Big 3 have their own problems associated with the 1960's way of managing HR but that is adequately covered elsewhere. The big 3 would have hit the fan much earlier if it wasn't for it's finance house: Refinancing mortgages after 2001 helped prop up big 3 sales of new cars (GM owned Dietech). With rates going North, it is no longer going to help them.

The natural scheme of things would be for 2 manufacturers to go out business and for prices to revert to natural levels. Toyota and Honda may be making money now but they will find it harder to grow: Their products are boring ! Quality is a hygene factor not a competitive advantage. Soon quality will be a given where even Big 3 are playing catch up (Afterall they use similar suppliers to japanese. For example :Braking. There aren't that many suppliers in the world). However, the political costs of letting a big manufacturer go under are something to consider. No politician likes to see a major employer go under as they impact things like GDP numbers and employment statistics.

To come back to Automotive industry itself and my experiences with it: I work for an electronic supplier who sells to multiple industry groups. We should be delighted with additional electronics going into the cars but Automotive is the highest cost of service.

Yes they have supposidly stable volumes but for the same piece part that we can sell elsewhere, they demand far more servicing and management attention than others like communications or consumer.

Having worked with others and now automotive again, Automotive industry wants their cake and eat it:

* They want military level quality at commercial pricing.
* They want leading edge technology but out of the shoot zero defects: For my industry the complexity is such that if they need zero defects, it should only taking mature technology.
* They bully their suppliers into very negative commercial contracts Penalties for exceeding quality, logistic requirements that are born by supplier Leadtimes much less that time it takes to manufacture it.

Nobody has mentioned it but has TS16949 been a factor ? Japanese customers don't require this but are doing better than US. When we deal with automotive parts, we add probably 5% just in dealing with "the Systems". We've actually told certain customers not to buy our parts for automotive application. We would be ok supplying them under normal T&C's but not under straight jacket of TS16949.

I am sure our top management would love to get out of this sector: It is inverse pareto :80% of their time spent on issues are associated with less than 20% of our business.
 
T

TedCambron

#18
Words of wisdom

Murphy's Law said:
The reason I say this it requires huge capital investment, has low returns and litigeousness associated with end consumer makes this business sector extremely unattractive. This in turn stiffles innovation and makes the car manufacturers an overly conservative industry.
Yes, I agree 100% and even though you get into more detail, I would like to hear about actual events. I think you have some good stories and I would enjoy them very much.
Murphy's Law said:
They want military level quality at commercial pricing.
I've been involved with military applications. Mainly the AMG Hummer. Yes, the real one. I love military standards because it deals with "real quality" instead of how much documentation there is to support it. I've found out that the automotive industry is more concerned of "who supplied it" rather than the actual form, fit, and function. Military is black and white, whereas automotive is up to interpretation of the standard.
 
J

JRaghavendran

#19
Cost of "Drugs Dont Work"

GM spends $860 per car if you include all costs associated with drug testing, lost time and rehab costs. This number does not include opportunity costs or cost of health insurance due to associated illnesses
 
Q

qualeety

#20
am i the only one who thinks cars are cheap?

i think the current prices are very very cheap, when you consider how expensive it is to service them..... when i started working in 1989, it would have costed me about 70+% of my annual salary to buy a car but it now only cost about 50%...:)...and no, i have not moved up the corp ladder to make more $$$...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Plan to Volvo Cars for capacity verification in Phase 3 of PPAP Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
E Different types of Actions? CARs, OFIs or N/A ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Does ISO 9001 require CARs for all customer complaints? Customer Complaints 2
T Is it necessary to Audit our CARs and SCARs? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
D SDS (MSDS) for complex products such as a TV, computer, cars, etc Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
O Nonconformance for vague CARs and PARs Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Q ISO 9001/14001 QEMS multiple CARs ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M Renaming CARs so that they do not seem negative ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
S Linking CARS (Corrective Action System) with the rest of our system Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
L How to deal with too many CARs (Corrective Action Requests), PARs (Preventive Action) Nonconformance and Corrective Action 25
N Combining Multiple CARs (Corrective Action Request) into One CAR? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
A Closing CARs (Corrective Action Requests) due to Process Change ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
B How can I control CARs (Corrective Action Requests)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Stijloor Vilnius Mayor A.Zuokas Fights Illegally Parked Cars with Tank Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 15
J Requirement of on-site follow up for Major CARs AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
A BMW recalls 350,000 cars World News 9
C Closure of CARs (Corrective Action Requests) and Audit Observations Internal Auditing 25
Marc China to build buses that cars can drive under World News 20
A Open CARs (Corrective Action Requests) and 8D Processes Nonconformance and Corrective Action 27
P Commute and Cars Opinion Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 17
Q CAR?s Responsibilities? How the responsibility will be shared in CARs ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
bobdoering As hybrid cars gobble rare metals, shortage looms World News 35
W GM to Import More Cars, UAW Angry World News 0
V AS9100B Time Limit? Time between your audit and when your CARs must be accepted AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
A Toyota to Recall More Than 1.35 Million Cars World News 0
Stijloor Deadly tension on the roads - Cars vs. Bikes Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 35
E General Analysis of CARs (Corrective Action Report) Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
Marc The 50 Worst Cars Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 11
N Corrective Actions and ECOs - If an ECO addresses the issue, why do we do CARs ? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 16
U Material specification for brake discs for passenger cars, LCVs & HCVs Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
C Polluting cars face charge rise - London World News 11
Marc US domestic cars make gains in reliability World News 3
J The energy of the future for future cars .pdf file World News 3
P Indian Auto major Tata motors planning to launch 2200USD cars World News 3
V CAR NCMR Software - SQL based, just for NCMR's and CARs Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 2
B How can I ask a customer not to issue CARs for trivial issues? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 17
S TS 16949 Clause 8.5.2 Audit Nonconformance for not issuing internal CARs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
Marc Predictive Maintenance? GM pitches "smart" cars to cut back on discounts World News 2
M CARs (correction action request) vs. NCMRs (nonconforming material report) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
Marc Experimental Hybrid Cars Get Up to 250 Mpg World News 17
Marc Electric cars as fast as a Ferrari World News 1
Marc Bill Gates Envisions Cars that Can't Crash World News 5
A AS9100 - FAA - Corporate - Authority to access company CARs and PARs? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 9
C Hybrid Cars - 100 year old idea World News 2
C Hybrid vehicles (cars) are getting Down Under Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 27
R Stupid Responses to CARs - Long Term Corrections or Root Causes Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 47
A Microsoft Controlled Cars Customer and Company Specific Requirements 7
B Judge Orders Ford To Recall Cars World News 1
N Guidance - Cost of Good Quality Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
C Budgetary cost to obtain ASME NQA-1 Quality Program Certification Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom