Hey Randy and
for the response!
Good to see you still standing guard at the Cove. In the name of objective journalism are you able to corroborate Weak Licks comments? I see Weak Licks has not posted lots here and his credibility rating is not real high yet. I really appreciate his/her/their contribution and I think it is probably right on mark but the obfuscations of identity diminish my level of comfort on the response.
Weak Licks sounds like they had boots on the ground when TMB was discussing this. The vocabulary of the process is impressive and I am inclined to believe the account of the events leading up to the TMB no votes but I wish I had more in terms of identity to help me believe this account. This is likely my problem as an auditor wanting to verify credibility of information and facts.
I am not suggesting I think Weak Licks is wrong about the back story. I would just like a little verification of the facts presented by Weak Licks. Randy, I know you from past discussions and you have high credibility in my book so any confirmation on the way the TMB voted or Weak Licks account of how this went down would be helpful.