Will the US Vote No? US TAG contingent on the fence

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
From: ISO Standards Discussion
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 07:08:10 -0500
Subject: Re: ISO-9001/2K Procedure-less? Why? /../Scalies/Arbuckle/Arter

From: Dennis Arter

>> Dennis Arter has indicated that the US TAG contingent has/will vote
>> nay on the whole thing. Good for them! I hope it turns out to be more
>> than a Quixotic exercise.
>
> Dennis...is this still true???

Well, not really. The USA intends to vote disapprove on the 9001 draft, due to an obvious problem with control of nonconformances. (Corrective action is suggested for EVERY nonconformance, which is not proper.) We also have serious problems with the audit clause, in that it reads very poorly and allows the report to bypass the auditee.

However...

At the next international meeting, these things will be discussed and the problems will be ironed out. At the end of the meeting, the USA may then elect to vote yes, based on the changes worked out.

I don't believe there will be sufficient dissatisfaction with the DIS to kill it. There is a slim chance that the changed DIS will go out for another vote before the final (FDIS) vote. That would, of course, set the schedule back by about six months. The chance is quite small, however.

> Is there a way I can keep up with the US TAG direction?

Subscribe the the Informed Outlook newsletter (now available through ASQ) or the Quality Systems Update newsletter (published by McGraw Hill). Or join the US Z1 committee and the US TAG176 committee.

Dennis R. Arter
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
From: (Manus)
Newsgroups: misc.industry.quality
Subject: Re: DIS 9001:2000 presentation material
Date: 12 Apr 2000 23:26:58 GMT

It is also my understanding that Japan is thinking of withholding their vote for it as they have problems, not with wording, but with content. Slan Leat!

Phil McManus
 
I

isodog

#3
(expleptive deleted) Japan! They have NEVER supported ISO 9000 cuz they think they are tyhe best! The bad news is they may be.
 
W

waberens

#5
The May 2000 Quality Progress on page 28 says that the U.S. TAG voted to oppose the draft international standards to ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 9001:2000. However they supported the language of ISO 9004:2000.

Bill
 
E
#6
I was in Colima and San-Francisco ISO meetings and know their atmosphere. There is a lot of discussions but nobody wants to stop before the finish.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
dgrainger Informational Parliament to vote on postponing new requirements for medical devices -17th April Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
John Broomfield Informational Upcoming vote on the kilogram - November 2018 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
M MDCG: industry is not part of and does not vote EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Please vote: term for an inspection plan for a family of parts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
Wes Bucey ASQ (American Society for Quality) By-Laws Changes - How did you vote? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 15
C IEC60601-1 3rd edition +ve vote - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Requirements IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
T New Standard - Qs 4?? TS16949 will not pass the vote for a standard IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
S FDIS 14001 & 14004 has been issued by the ISO/CS on August 12, 2004 for a vote ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
Marc May 2004 Articles Poll (Vote) Thread Registered Visitor Articles Archive 12
Marc Poll Types: Blind vs. Open - Article Vote/Poll Thread Registered Visitor Articles Archive 7
S DIS ISO 14001 Vote and TC207 SC1 Meeting 1-3 March 2004 (Paris) ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 23
D Pareto vote - Could someone explain the pareto vote process? Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 6
B The 25-04-2000 Vote - Did the vote about DIS ISO 9001:2000 obtained 75% of yes? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R Specific ISO requirement to fill in all spaces on a move tag? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
S Conformity vs. 8130-3 tag creation date Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
L Valid reasons to omit an "ear-tag" type label on a cable? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
T EFA or F/C on the TAG EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 1
T EASA TAG Block 11 Status/Work issue Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
I Faster way to Tag Parts for Painting Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
V Ford Dimensional Tag Characteristics requirements APQP and PPAP 2
pammesue Non Conforming Material in the Warehouse..to tag or not? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
R 5S Red Tag and ISO Procedure Red Tag - Tag Color Conflict Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
U Form and Procedure for Red Tag in 5S Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 3
J Lock-out / Tag-Out Procedures as Quality Controlled Documents? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
V ISO 9001 User Survey from the US TAG to ISO/TC176 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Q Marking Parts Manufacturing Approval (PMA) Parts with a 8130-3 Tag Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 9
C FAA 8130-21G Airworthiness Approval Tag Form - New Changes? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
E Identification of out-of-process parts - Using the wrong tag Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
Marc UK Police Raid Party After Seeing "All-Night" Tag On Facebook World News 1
C Form 1 EASA / Form 8130-3 tag - light aircraft with registration N EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 5
B Should there be a Red Tag Time Limit, in regards to 5S Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 13
T Work Order and Part Rework Tag Retention ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
E Lock-out Tag-out does is have to be a procedure in QS or can it just be referenced ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
H Nonconforming Material Tag? Description or template of what items should be included ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
L Nonconforming material tag - People are not filling out required paperwork Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
W Nonconformance ID tags - Seeking universal non-conforming Red Tag - Approx. 4" x 6" Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Reject Tags - red tag is a form and needs to have a part number and revision? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 14
D ISO 9001:2000 TAG Committee - TC 176 is responsible for ISO 9000:2000 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
K ISO / TS 16949 Draft "Disapproved"? December 2001 US TAG ISO/TC 176 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
S Red tag or not to Red tag... ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
Marc ISO 19011 - Report on US TAG Standards Group Meetings General Auditing Discussions 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom