Working on a 510(k) that is very similar to the predicate device

robertjbeck

Involved In Discussions
#1
I am working on a 510(k) that is very similar to the predicate device, which is an earlier version of the new device. one difference is that the original 510(k) had a contraindication (stating the device should not be used in patients with pacemakers). there is no data that supports this contraindication. the company is embarking on a clinical trial that includes patients with pacemakers, and FDA has ruled that this study is a non-significant risk study.

any suggestions about how to proceed with removing this contraindication in the new 510(k)?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
Re: 510(k)

I am working on a 510(k) that is very similar to the predicate device, which is an earlier version of the new device. one difference is that the original 510(k) had a contraindication (stating the device should not be used in patients with pacemakers). there is no data that supports this contraindication. the company is embarking on a clinical trial that includes patients with pacemakers, and FDA has ruled that this study is a non-significant risk study.

any suggestions about how to proceed with removing this contraindication in the new 510(k)?
What's the basis for the NSR determination? Is there any clinical evidence available to support use in patients with pacemakers?

I'd say that the risk should be formally analysed and managed, and that clinical evidence should be compiled to support the risk estimates / evaluations. The highlights could be included in the 510(k) submission where you discuss the differences from the predicate, to support a decision that the devices are still equivalent although the contraindication is removed (i.e. the risk is not significantly increased).

Cheers,
Ronen.
 

robertjbeck

Involved In Discussions
#3
Re: 510(k)

The NSR came from a proposal for a trial that uses the device in patients with pacemakers. FDA responded with a determination that the "proposed clinical investigation is a non-significant risk device study .. therefore an IDE is not required for the study." pacemakers were not listed as an exclusion criterion in the study protocol. there is a section in the protocol that specifically states, "subjects with pacemakers or ICDs will be included into this study .." based on a previous study.

This previous study evaluated the system for electromagnetic interference in 100 patients, with no interference detected. I suppose this data could be included in the 510(k) if necessary, but apparently the study sponsor doesn't want to provide it except as a summary with not much more detail that the previous sentence.

I think your suggestion about using a risk-based approach sounds very good.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
Re: 510(k)

The NSR came from a proposal for a trial that uses the device in patients with pacemakers. FDA responded with a determination that the "proposed clinical investigation is a non-significant risk device study .. therefore an IDE is not required for the study." pacemakers were not listed as an exclusion criterion in the study protocol. there is a section in the protocol that specifically states, "subjects with pacemakers or ICDs will be included into this study .." based on a previous study.

This previous study evaluated the system for electromagnetic interference in 100 patients, with no interference detected. I suppose this data could be included in the 510(k) if necessary, but apparently the study sponsor doesn't want to provide it except as a summary with not much more detail that the previous sentence.

I think your suggestion about using a risk-based approach sounds very good.
From the sound of it FDA didn't really look into the issue, and since the specific risk(?) wasn't highlighted, it could be plain oversight. So I wouldn't count on that.

Were there any subjects with pacemakers in the previous study (electromagnetic interference)?
 

robertjbeck

Involved In Discussions
#5
Re: 510(k)

Yes, there were. I don't have the details available but the protocol states, 'the [device] was placed on the skin directly over the implanted device in 100 subjects. in 208 successful uses, no EMI was detected.' I realize this is hardly complete data, for instance, the total number of uses is missing, but I think this is worth citing as data showing that risk with pacemaker patients is low.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
John Broomfield Guidance on Safe Working During Covid-19 Pandemic Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
S Experience working with TUV SUD or Rheinland, and/or BSI Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
G Working on a Root Cause Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 11
M Informational TGA-led IMDRF Personalised Medical Devices working group meets in Canberra Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational EU – Minutes of the 24 July 2019 SCHEER Working Group on safety of breast implants in relation to anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) meeting Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Watchcat MDD, MDR/IVDR, Working Groups, Expert Panels, MEDDEVs and Other EU Guidances EU Medical Device Regulations 32
T Is anyone working with N299.1 (Supply/service to nuclear power plants)? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
M Informational EU – 12th Meeting of the Working Group on Guidelines on benefit – risk assessment of Phthalates in Medical Devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
G Anyone working with or planning to do business in the CBD (cannabidiol) industry? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M Applicability of Means of Protection, working voltage in an Automated External Defibrillator IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
Sidney Vianna ISO 9001 News Tirelessly Improving the Brand Integrity of ISO 9001 - Working Group under ISO TC 176 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 42
E Feeling ill when working with adhesives Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
M Informational EU – SCHEER – Minutes of the Working Group meeting on guidelines on the benefit-risk assessment of the presence of phthalates in certain medical devic Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
T IEC60601-1: Isolation for an applied part with working voltage of 1500Vp. IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
Rameshwar25 Min working experience for IATF 16949 third party auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
J AS9100 - Working Outside of Scope of Certification AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
S ISO 13485 Cl. 6.2 Human Resources - Personnel working within the QMS ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Outsourced Major Processes - Working for Two Sister Companies AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
A Working for multiple CB's (Certification Bodies) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 17
N Anyone working on NIST SP 800-171 (Network and Information Security)? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
O Cleaning API Rotary Shoulder Connections Working Mates exposed to Outside Weather General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
L How many working hours to required to implement ISO 14001 ? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
R How to Determine Working Voltage & Tolerance for Isolation Barriers? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
S OHSAS 18001 - 4.3.2 Legal and Other Requirements - Working document or template Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
D How Working Standard Calibration result use in Verification of Equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
B Any future for someone working as Lead Quality right these days? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
W Control of Document - Working Instruction and Checklist ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
W Working in a company where we try to implement ISO 27001 IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 9
C "PEAK WORKING VOLTAGE" with a 220-240VAC nominal Power Supply IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
C What is an acceptable bioburden level or count when working in cleanroom ISO class7 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
AnaMariaVR2 IMDRF Working With ICH on Harmonized Electronic Submission System for Drugs, Devices Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
J0anne US Working Permit Requirements for European Consultants Career and Occupation Discussions 2
E What are the major difficulties when working as a consultant in your industry? Consultants and Consulting 20
B Need help on an application we are working on Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
A I am working in QA. How can I gain knowledge and skills on EHS system? Career and Occupation Discussions 4
K What are the challenges of working in UAE as an Auditor ? General Auditing Discussions 2
X Shall not exceed 2 working weeks = shall not exceed within 10 working days? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
I IEC 60601-1 Least Favourable Working Conditions for Medical Equipment IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
L Working closer and better with Suppliers - Practical ideas to improve? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
J Frequency of Re-Testing Working Standards (Secondary Reference Standard) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
R Supplier Satisfaction Survey about Working with us as a Customer Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
R Informational How to consider the Working Voltage for splitting 2MOPP IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 39
M Working Styles - The lazy, last minutes type Career and Occupation Discussions 13
R Determining Working Voltage - Drawing a Medical Device Insulation Diagram IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
Q Quality Working Documents in same QMS Folders? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
J Audit of Supplier who is working toward AS9100 certification General Auditing Discussions 5
R Metrology Control Charts for Reference and Working Standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
M Working with the "USDA Process Verified" Program ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M Approval of an Outside "vendor" (a welder) working in-line at our facility Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
B Number of employees working for automotive portion higher than stated - Re-audit? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom