|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 QS-9000
 Inspection Sampling Plan
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Inspection Sampling Plan |
|
Deb Weissler Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 9 |
posted 16 November 1998 09:36 AM
   
Under the previous QS-9000 revision (2nd) our company applied the Chrysler 'Lot Inspection Sampling Table' to inprocess and final (outgoing) inspection, and since we test all product 100% we felt we adequately met this requirement. We did not, however, apply this table to Receiving Inspection, chossing our own sample size based upon supplier performance and C=0. Now Chrysler's PSO requirement is spelled out in QS-9000 (3rd edition)& PSO clearly states in section 6) Incoming & Outgoing Material Qualification/Certfication Plan that the sampling table applies. This will impose a huge burden on RI at a time when our customers are pushing to REDUCE RI, not increase that activity. Any thoughts? IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 17 November 1998 03:03 PM
Have you spoken with your Chrysler rep about it yet? IP: Logged |
|
Deb Weissler Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 9 |
posted 17 November 1998 03:24 PM
It is Chrysler SQA who is stating this requirement. In the past, Chrysler accepted the sampling plan as applying to outgoing product inspection only. Now SQA is imposing the PSO manual and its Chysler-established sampling plan for RI in lieu of our previous established quality system procedure. As I see it, the danger of a customer imposed sampling plan is that with multiple customers, a company could conceivably have multiple sampling plan requirements. Many of our parts are interchangeable, regardless of customer. In the past we based our RI sampling on supplier delivered product. Inspecting 125-200 o-rings or stampings because the sampling plan chart requires it is not cost effective. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 01 August 1999 09:29 AM
No one commented on this when posted last November. Anyone have any comments now that some of the 3rd edition issues have been addressed? IP: Logged |
|
Dawn Forum Contributor Posts: 245 |
posted 12 August 1999 04:47 PM
This is kinda the same subject, but different topic. We use three pieces for setup inspection and in-process checks The auditor states we shall determine why 3 pcs. is a statistcally sound sampling plan or use 4 or 5 samples instead. The QS SPC book does not state what makes 4 or 5 pieces statistically sound-it just states to use it. How do I determine 3 pieces, 4 or 5 are statistically sound? OC curves and the like are only confusing me. IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
