|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 QS-9000
 Management Review
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Management Review |
|
Lyndon Diong Forum Contributor Posts: 21 |
posted 14 December 1998 03:49 AM
   
We conduct a management review once every 3 months. Do the management review need to review all the elements of the entire quality system everytime? IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 14 December 1998 07:52 AM
Nope. Not everything every time. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 05 February 2000 07:07 PM
Qualification - all have to be done once a year, but not all of them at every meeting if you meet more than once a year. IP: Logged |
|
Lyndon Diong Forum Contributor Posts: 21 |
posted 08 February 2000 01:57 AM
How do we show evidence that all elements are reviewed. IP: Logged |
|
barb butrym Forum Contributor Posts: 637 |
posted 08 February 2000 08:51 AM
the records (minutes?) of the meetings should provide that evidence IP: Logged |
|
Qualiman Forum Contributor Posts: 35 |
posted 09 February 2000 08:53 AM
If you use a basic form as an agenda and you annotate that form during the meeting you have your evidence. The file Mgmt_rev.pdf in the Elsmar.com/pdf_files/ directory is an example of a very simple management review form (agenda). It is for a very small company and is from several years - so you would have to update it and adjust it for your company, but that's not a big deal. In so far as specifically addressing each element once a year, ask yourself how you do it. Some companies do this by way of dicsussion of presentation of audit findings (internal and external). If at 1 meeting you discuss audits (which should touch on every element - even if no findings were found in an element, that should be stated) you annotate that you did so. If your auditor then says something like "Well, I see you wrote that you discussed audit findings and you say you touched on every element but how do I know you actually discussed every element..." I would suggest you get ready to request a different auditor. There is a point where things become 'stupid'. To go to the extreme a company would have to record every meeting on audio tape (at least) to catch every detail and to provide proof (evidence) of every detail discussed. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
posted 09 February 2000 09:44 AM
> > A recent ISO9001 continuous assessment highlighted that our management > > review was lacking in the suitability (are the systems you have the > > "right" systems) portion. The problem is the objective evidence. We were > > told that usually the problem part of the management review is the > > effectiveness (are your systems operating as they are documented) > > portion and not the suitability portion. > > > > I am looking for how others are fulfilling the suitability portion of > > the management review and how you provide the objective evidence. > > > > Thanks, > > Ryan Fleser > > [email protected] Subject: Re: Q:Management Review/O'Leary From: IN%"[email protected]" "Daniel J. O'Leary" In management reviews we address the problem with a statement in the minutes. We believe that suitability is a conclusion that you draw based on the information presented. We may say the system is suitable or we may say it is suitable after some changes have been made. Our minutes, the quality record, have these defined requirements. The meeting AGENDA List of attendees The minutes of the meeting are reviewed and approved by the Quality System Management Representative and the Vice President & General Manager. Dan O'Leary CQA, CQE, CQM, CRE IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
