The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  QS-9000
  Laboratory Scope : 4.10.6

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Laboratory Scope : 4.10.6
Robert Raymond
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 1
From:Louisville, Ky, USA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 17 January 1999 07:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Raymond   Click Here to Email Robert Raymond     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My company is a small paint company - we are currently QS registered under the second edition. We have a research and development lab and also a Quality Control lab. The research and development lab is "over" the QC lab. Pertaining to 4.10.6 - do we need two laboratory scopes? If not, do I need to include the QC lab in the scope? Are there any rough examples of a lab scope out there somewhere? Our next audit is the end of March and we must meet the third edition by this audit.

------------------

IP: Logged

Batman
Forum Contributor

Posts: 111
From:Kane, PA 16735
Registered:

posted 20 January 1999 08:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Batman   Click Here to Email Batman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dan Indish gave this link in response to my question similar to yours. It expounds on the 4.10.6 "Laboratory" but it is not completely clear to me. If you look to a couple of days ago in another thread, I asked a similar question - multiple areas defined as "lab."

http://www.aiag.org/quality/4.10.6.html

I thought I was understanding this, but my MR just asked for instructions for all parts tested, and their respective standards - ASME, etc. However, the AIAG link does not state this specifically, i think.

Check the other threads in this area. Marc put in an expert's opinion, which seemed to clarify somewhat.

IP: Logged

Roger Eastin
Forum Wizard

Posts: 345
From:Greenville, SC
Registered:

posted 26 January 1999 08:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Roger Eastin   Click Here to Email Roger Eastin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Does anyone have an example of a laboratory scope? Our metrology lab is being audited to QS, 3rd edition and needs a laboratory scope. By the way, why does QS specify that this must be a record as opposed to it being part of the lab manual? (I guess this reminds me of needing a form to fill out or something along those lines.) If anyone does, please mail it to roger.eastin@us.michelin.com. Thanks.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 27 January 1999 10:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Marc put in an expert's opinion, which seemed to clarify somewhat.
Ummm, yeah... Sorry I didn't get back into this. I think there's another thread with this as a topic. I've been busy as heck so I'm missing things here and there.

OK - First - I don't consider myself an expert. I put this site up and what is now the forum as you know it because I am NOT an expert, but an 'apprentice'. I have lured folks like Don Winton, Roger Eastin, Jon Shaver, Bryon Simmons, and - well, a whole bunch of people here. We each have out contributions and we're all learning.

Now - If you want to see some examples of SCOPEs, see the thread on A2LA and such in the calibration forum (I think). For example, see An 'old' Thread

Now - Which question have we not answered?....

Oh -

quote:
Our metrology lab is being audited to QS, 3rd edition and needs a laboratory scope. By the way, why does QS specify that this must be a record as opposed to it being part of the lab manual? (I guess this reminds me of needing a form to fill out or something along those lines.)
Maybe I'm missing something in the interpretation. If it's in the Lab Manual, is the scope not documented? Is that not the requirement?

Also see Lab thread in the 4.10 'section'.

IP: Logged

Roger Eastin
Forum Wizard

Posts: 345
From:Greenville, SC
Registered:

posted 28 January 1999 08:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Roger Eastin   Click Here to Email Roger Eastin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the threads (sounds like I'm a beatnik thanking you for some clothes that you gave me!). I would think that documenting a laboratory scope would be enough and maybe it is. I was just wondering why the QS manual states that it is a quality RECORD as opposed to a level 3 document that would be in a lab manual.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 11 July 1999 03:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A somewhat related tidbit:

Subject: Re: Q: QS-9000 /Keskitalo/Shibley
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:21:26 -0600
From: ISO Standards Discussion

From: PPPQC@aol.com
Subject: Re: Q: QS-9000 /Keskitalo/Shibley

After bringing this question to our training consultant (CMTC of California), it was distinctly related to testing facilities that had chemical or metallurgical in house laboratories. The Calibration reference is only to the equipment used to test the chemical or metallurgical instruments. The definition of the scope in the glossary simply puts the word "May Include" which is of course not one of the many "Shalls" or "Shall nots of QS. After asking the same question to our accrediting auditor (TUV Rhineland) it was agreed upon that calibration of inspection equipment is not categorically online with "Laboratory Calibration. Element 4:11 is distinctly describing the areas of auditable zones for standard inspection tool calibration.

Dan Shibley

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 16 March 2000 10:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Also see https://elsmar.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000247.html

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 22 March 2001).]

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!