|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 QS-9000
 Design process versus Design Product
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Design process versus Design Product |
|
Steven Sulkin Forum Contributor Posts: 75 |
posted 03 March 1999 03:08 PM
   
My facility is not responsible for changing product specs. Is that the key? I think this is a very gray area for some companies that are very process rather than product focused. Some products are valued for their intrinsic properties rather than dimensional characteristics. This is true to the point that these intrinsic values ARE responsible for the performance of the product. A muffler is valued mostly for its form and fit. Does it seal againts other parts, is it within dimensional tolerances, etc. A silicon wafer, sputtering target, and many other semiconductor products are valued for their intrinsic properties. The grain size, orientation, texture of a target has to meet customer defined specs. However, the processing required to produce these results is not defined by the customer. What do you think? IP: Logged |
|
Steven Sulkin Forum Contributor Posts: 75 |
posted 03 March 1999 03:14 PM
My previous message was intended as a reply to Definition of "Development" The question brought up surrounds the difficulty in defining Design Responsibility. IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
