Posts: 22
From:London, England
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 21 May 2000 07:18 AM               

---

WHAT WILL COMPANIES BE REQUIRED TO DO IN ORDER TO MIGRATE FROM QS9000 TO THESE STANDARDS - BREIF ANSWER PLEASE NOT LINK TO THREAD! HIGHLY APPRECIATED

IP: Logged

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 21 May 2000 07:39 AM               

---

There are a number of threads in the TS 16949 forum which address the differences.

You say: "...BREIF ANSWER PLEASE NOT LINK TO THREAD!..." Sorry - you'll have to do your own homework by reading the threads.

IP: Logged

Posts: 19
From:dongguan,guangdong,p.r.china
Registered: Nov 98

posted 29 May 2000 07:25 PM               

---

99% is same and 1% is different. "99% = $."

IP: Logged

Posts: 18
From:The Netherlands
Registered: Apr 2000

posted 30 May 2000 02:29 AM               

---

Khan, I«ve got a list of "shalls" for TS16949 from Mary Retcher. I«ve you want it I can send it to you.

Greetings,
Martin

IP: Logged

Posts: 19
From:dongguan,guangdong,p.r.china
Registered: Nov 98

posted 30 May 2000 05:33 AM               

---

Martin:
one for me pls. -> [email protected]
thanks! gary

IP: Logged

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 30 May 2000 07:13 AM               

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Martin:

Khan, I«ve got a list of "shalls" for TS16949 from Mary Retcher.

---

Too much to post in this thread?

IP: Logged

Posts: 245
From:St. Marys, PA
Registered: Sep 98

posted 30 May 2000 08:34 PM               

---

Can I have a copy too, PLEEEEEEZ?

IP: Logged

Posts: 18
From:The Netherlands
Registered: Apr 2000

posted 31 May 2000 02:27 AM               

---

OK!! I can send it to you all but only when you give me your postal adress, because it«s a hard copy and I don«t have an electronic version. Send your postal adress to [email protected]

Greetings,
Martin

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)