The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  IASG sanctioned interpretations

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   IASG sanctioned interpretations
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 3
Registered: May 2000

posted 25 May 2000 01:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for VMartin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
During are last assessment audit, we were notified about a new intrepretation from AIAG, dated 3/21/2000.

A supplier's registration will be placed on immediate probation if....
Minor non-conformance corrective action is verified by the Registrar as not being effectively implemented with 60 days of the date identified; minor non-conformance closure may require on-site verification by the Registrar.
Interpretation of this new requirement was all AR's from previous audit, had to be verified as effective and closed within 60 days, if not "Major" would be issued. No time lines would be accepted. If evidence could not be supplied to show closure, a lead auditor from our registrar would be sent to do an onsite verification.

I'm not sure that all AR's can be verified as effective within the time frame given. Just wanted to get some communication going on this new interpretation, so that no one else was caught off guard.

[This message has been edited by VMartin (edited 25 May 2000).]

IP: Logged

Cheech Wizard

Posts: 46
Registered: Feb 99

posted 26 May 2000 05:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for admin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'd like to hear some feedback as well. I really hadn't read the interpretations, to be honest. I don't have any current QS clients and don't expect any - so I've backed off on caring.

So - your question prompted me to do so.

This sounds absurd to me. I have never heard of a deadline for implementation and proof of effectiveness in a defined time such as 60 days.

Did this happen to you?

IP: Logged

Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 3
Registered: May 2000

posted 26 May 2000 08:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for VMartin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Our auditors were very gracious in closing previous audit findings. Seemed to be, not as quick on issuing new findings.
My opinion, allowing us a fresh start, because of the new requirement.

I believe, that this could possibly effect the answer to findings, just because of trying to be able to show effective implementation within 60 days.

It will be interesting.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!