|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() QS-9000
![]() Management Review
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Management Review |
|
Alex Grguric Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
QS requires that a yearly review of the quality system is conducted. Our approach is to review each of the elements with the element coordinators and the management representative. Please give me some feedback on what others do at mgt review meetings. IP: Logged |
|
jessie unregistered |
We hold a management review meeting once per six months. In this meeting, we will review 1) system effectiveness reported by element coordinator 2) nonconformities analysis 3). The achievement of quality goal. Actually, I wonder how to evaluate the effectiveness of system. Is there any good measurement tool? Any reply is appreciated. best regards, IP: Logged |
|
Al Dyer Forum Wizard Posts: 622 |
We do management review in 5 phases: 1: Daily production meeting with managers. (Review daily requirements and quality/production concerns) 2: Weekly meeting of the QS-Steering Committee. (Review continuous improvements, process assessment results, corrective action progress) 3: Monthly Management Review Meeting. (PPM, C/A Results, Customer Satisfaction, Process Capability, Delivery, Downtime, PPAP, Continuous Improvement, Employee Satidfaction, Internal Audit Results. 4: Quarterly Management Review. (Same as monthly review plus Meeting Business Plan Objectives, Policy Review, System Suitability and Effectiveness, Internal Audit Results and Schedules) 5. Yearly Employee review. (Training Effectiveness, Performance etc...) Each of these reviews has an agenda that ensures all areas noted in the quality system are reviewed and documented. ASD... ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Alex Grguric Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
To evaluate the effectiveness of the quality system, I conduct monthly assessments to determine if various segments of the quality system are being utilized and executed. This information is reported to management and compare with previous months data. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
See Elsmar.com/pdf_files/Mgmt_rev.pdf IP: Logged |
|
e.s.deo Forum Contributor Posts: 13 |
I feel the methodology as followed by AL DYER can be appropriate. However alternate methodology can be used as long as ALL elements are covered during the CROSS FUNCTIONAL management reviews. However it would be required at each stage to review the effectiveness of the elements. In how many cases are the process capabilities more than a set value? What is the effectiveness of actions decided earlier about the same? Any further actions needed? Any additions/deletions to the list of operations on SPC ...? And so on .. HOWEVER IT IS NOT MANDATORY TO HOLD SUCH REVIEWS AT AN YEARLY FREQUENCY... ALTHOUGH IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE..YOU CAN DEFINE THE FREQUENCY AS APPRPRIATE TO YOUR BUSINESS AND FOLLOW THE SAME. Thanks [This message has been edited by e.s.deo (edited 26 October 2000).] IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
