The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  QS-9000
  QS9000 vs TL9000

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   QS9000 vs TL9000
Casana
Forum Contributor

Posts: 22
From:Cranford, NJ
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 12 January 2001 03:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Casana   Click Here to Email Casana     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was wondering if anyone with a QS registration has been asked by a customer to also become TL-9000 registered? Or do you think that having QS could help "protect" us from being asked by our customers to go for TL?

I'm having nightmares visions of multiple registration audits... no one has asked us yet, but some of our potential customers are in the telecommunications industry. We're trying to decide if we should include our newly developing products into our current QS registration as a way to avoid having to do TL. We hear that TL is even more ćintenseä than QS...

Alternatively Iād love to hear any what the differences are between QS & TL (donāt know anything about TL, and donāt know if I should spend the time/resources in learning more about it).
Thanks!

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 13 January 2001 02:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I really haven't looked closely at the TL document but I would bet potential telecom customers would want it. I also bet TL is hardly any different than QS.

IP: Logged

stefanson
Forum Contributor

Posts: 24
From:La Mesa, CA, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 13 January 2001 06:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stefanson   Click Here to Email stefanson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I completed a Quest-sanctioned TL 9000 course for registrar auditors in December. I was already a certified QS-9000 Lead Auditor, and have conducted more than 600 audits after working in various industries for 25 years as Corp. QA Mgr., Mfg. Mgr. & Plant Mgr. IMHO, there are enough differences in the TL requirements from QS for a Telecom Service Provider or 1st tier supplier to require (or strongly recommend) subcontractor registration to TL 9000. Also, the ISO 9001: 2000 requirements actually try to catch up with TL requirements. TL 9000 Release 3.0, coming this March, will only covert to the ISO 2000 format, with inconsequential changes to current TL requirements. It would be prudent for all organizations to at least peruse the TL requirements and consider implementing them, because global harmonization of the Telecom industry requirements are far more suitable for reducing cycle time, maintaining velocity while adapting to changing conditions and therefore far more value-added than QS 9000 or 16949.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 13 January 2001 07:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What are the 'main' differences between the two? I expect QS asks a lot more than the TL spec while the TL spec has a few industry specific requirements beyond what ISO 9K requires.

IP: Logged

stefanson
Forum Contributor

Posts: 24
From:La Mesa, CA, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 13 January 2001 08:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stefanson   Click Here to Email stefanson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Some of the primary differences between QS & TL (not necessarily in order of importance) are:
1. Standardization & harmonization of requirements worldwide. (Will the big three ever subordinate QS to 16949?)
2. Eliminate need for compliance to other management system requirements (not customer-specific, e.g., Ford, GM, etc.).
3. Continuing communication and joint problem solving between service providers, suppliers and subcontractors is required (and monitored and reported) to quickly resolve problems and cooperate in finding solutions.
4. Common industry measurements (metrics) for hardware, software & service performance reported to measure resuts relative to requirements. Organizations can compare their performance against best & worst in industry, confidentially.

These are some of the general differences between TL & QS that I perceive. I'm currently working on a detailed (to include requirement paragraph number) cross-reference matrix that will list specific differences, and submit it to this excellent forum.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!