The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  QS-9000
  Element 4.9.1 Process Monitoring

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Element 4.9.1 Process Monitoring
Christopher Kierans
unregistered
posted 29 March 2001 01:55 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My question refers to Element 4.9.1 Process Monitoring and Operator Instructions. (QS9000 3rd edition, p. 36)

"Process Monitoring and operator instructions shall include, or reference, as appropriate:

Operation name and number keyed to the process flow diagram. ..."

I would be interested in hearing from people as to how they comply with this requirement.

Our division got nailed on an corporate (internal) audit because the steps in our Process Flow were not numbered. In fact, they are saying that we should LINK our process flow, FMEAs, Control plans, and our Operator instructions with numbered steps.

I had always heard that this was a suggestion, but I was told that registrars are hitting the suppliers with majors if they do not comply. All suggestions are welcome (from manufacturers especially) Also , what is the appropriate meaning of "as appropriate"...? Does this turn the shall into a should?

IP: Logged

Sam
Forum Contributor

Posts: 244
From:
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 30 March 2001 09:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam   Click Here to Email Sam     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
<<"Our division got nailed on an corporate (internal) audit because the steps in our Process Flow were not numbered. In fact, they are saying that we should LINK our process flow, FMEAs, Control plans, and our Operator instructions with numbered steps.">>

I was also nailed on this at a previous place of employment.Refer to step 15 & 18 in the APQP for directions on the control plan.
This is the statement that I was referred to for review.

<<"I had always heard that this was a suggestion, but I was told that registrars are hitting the suppliers with majors if they do not comply.">>

I don't see it fitting the catagory for a major, but then again it depends on the mood of the auditor. Even if you contest and win you have wasted a lot of tme and money.

<<"All suggestions are welcome (from manufacturers especially) Also , what is the appropriate meaning of "as appropriate"...? Does this turn the shall into a should?">>

I don't see it turning into a should or a shall, but if you reach a consensus it could turn into an "Opportunity for improvement"

IP: Logged

Christopher Kierans
unregistered
posted 30 March 2001 11:20 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sam, thanks for your reply. I am guessing you are referring to Steps 15 & 18 in the Control Plan methodology at the back of the APQP book. I have looked at these. The problem is the Element 4.9.1 is worded such that no reference is made to Control Plans, only the linkage between PFD and the operator instructions. I realise this shouldnt be a big deal, but I would be interested in how other manufacturers addressed this issue. Chris Kierans

IP: Logged

Sam
Forum Contributor

Posts: 244
From:
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 30 March 2001 02:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam   Click Here to Email Sam     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes I'm referring to step #15 & #18 on page 39.
Also refer to the 2nd Para of 4.9.1 " These instructions . . .

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!