|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
![]() Range
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Range |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
Found this interesting: -------Snip------- In response to Range: {Not Mine, Don} Dona, you and your husband is right. The method you used of subtracting the smallest data value from the largest is the correct way of calculating the sample range. The only possible alternative I could think of would be if you wanted to construct an unbiased estimate of the population range. For example, suppose you have a uniform distribution between A and B, with both limits being unknown. You then calculate from the data, the sample range, r = largest minus smallest. This r necessarily is less than the population range, R=B-A. To obtain an unbiased estimate of R, you need to multiply r by (N+1)/(N-1), where N is the sample size. Note that this is a multiplicative factor, not an additive factor. In short, I can't think of any reason to add one to the sample range. -------End Snip-------
quote: Thoughts, Regards, IP: Logged |
|
John C Forum Contributor Posts: 134 |
Don, My statistical training was always sketchy and is now very rusty, so I offer this only as a possible clue to the problem. I canāt vouch for itās validity; For variables, the range is highest minus lowest. Thatās the way I was taught. eg measurement in inches; Highest 10, lowest 5. 10 - 5 = 5. For attributes, itās the number of consecutive attributes in the sample (or potential attributes, if all possible have not been observed) that gives the range, eg; marks on a screen; Highest sample had 10, lowest had 5. The range can be considered to include; 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. So thatās 6 levels of attributes. 10-5 = 5. 5+1 = 6. rgds, John C IP: Logged |
|
Kevin Mader Forum Wizard Posts: 575 |
Don, As part of figuring Sigma, finding the estimation and unbiased estimation is merely the result of data from a population or from a sample. As always, the sample always has potential error beyond the population estimate and n-1 is normally used. Not sure why to add/subtract a 1 for the Range though. JC's explanation seems reasonable, but I can not confirm. IP: Logged |
|
Don Winton Forum Contributor Posts: 498 |
quote: Agreed. I believe the response cited was probably considering this example. Or rather, see below.
quote: It is also possible that the respondent was thinking sigma rather than range. I posted this in order to see what the responses would be. Many thanks, guys. Regards, IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
