|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
![]() Verification of Job Setups of QS9K
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Verification of Job Setups of QS9K |
|
chen Forum Contributor Posts: 19 |
"job setups shall be verified whenever a setup is performed(e.g.initial run of a job,material changeover,job change,significant time periods lapsed between runs,etc.)" - from QS9K 4.9.4 P37 "setup verification I want to use the method to verify the job setup of our press production. pls tell me if you have any information about job setup verification. have a nice day. Mar.,28/1999 IP: Logged |
|
Batman Forum Contributor Posts: 111 |
Hi Chen! We have used almost this exact definition for several years. Where appropriate, when a job is setup, the set up person takes a normal sample for the SPC chart and plots it. If the Xbar and sigma or range is in control, the set-up person initials that plotted point and the set-up is "verified." This only applies to set-ups that have run n the past, in control. Yes, they are talking about the UCL and LCL. Quickly, your Xbar control limits are +/- 3 sigma from the central line. Imagine dividing the area between the UCL and LCL into thirds, three zones. The middle third is the +/- one sigma zone. If your first plotted group is within this middle zone, the process is allowed to go on. If the plotted point is in the next zone towards teh UCL or LCL, the requirement is to take another sample and plot that one. If that sample is in the second zone, an adjustment is required. If the first sample plotted is in the outer zone, that is near the UCL or LCL, an immediate adjustment must be made, and start again. The range is normally assumed to be (or remain) in control from the last run. In general (note, in general), if the range chart is out of control, this is a machine or tooling problem, one that normal 'post-setup' adjustments cannot fix. This is of course one "recommended" method, using an SPC chart. There are certainly other methods, and they may work for you. IP: Logged |
|
chen Forum Contributor Posts: 19 |
Hi batman: Thanks for your information! I also have some questions: thanks a lot/have a nice day. Mar.,31/99 IP: Logged |
|
Batman Forum Contributor Posts: 111 |
Hi chen! Sorry for the delay, I did not realize you had further questions. If you are going to use the SPC chart for job set-up verification, take the last chart used and plot the values from the samples from the set-up. This plotted point should be "in control" according to the rules stated above. If it isn't, adjustments should be made towards moving "in control" and another plot made. The SPC chart will already have upper and lower control limits set. You do not use any sort of "specification" chart here. Also, this is for product that has been run before. New product - first run stuff - needs data collected first before establishing control limits. "Set-up verification" does not apply here. New part data has to be recorded first, then control limits calculated. IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
