The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Control chart application for post heat treat processes

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Control chart application for post heat treat processes
Mark W
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 6
From:
Registered: Feb 99

posted 14 July 1999 01:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mark W     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have struggled with trying to find a method/solution/tool...or something to analyze a process in which dimensional product characteristics change after the parts are heat treated. Our company performs induction heat treat internally where only 2 parts are heat treated at a time, and we also send batches of parts out to subcontractors for carbonitride where thousands of parts might be furnace heat treated simultaneously. For some critical characteristics we have Xbar-R charts in use at the machining operation, and the process demonstrates a statistically controlled process. The problem arises when variations in material chemistry, quench rate, etc. cause these dimensions to both "grow" and "shrink" in sometimes significant amounts.
For our internal heat treating, we perform many different studies to try to control the process variables so that we can try to predict where to center the machining process in order to meet the specifications after heat treat. Then periodically we take samples on these dimensions as the heat treating is performed, and chart them using another Xbar-R chart to determine our capability indexes and whether the process is still in statistical control. We have seen some success and many frustrations with this method.
The problem is further complicated when we must try to position the machining process for large batches of parts which go to subcontractors for heat treat processing. One of the major obstacles is trying to develop a way of determining statistical control for batches of parts in which we are not running. We must rely on incoming sampling from these lots to try to determine compliance with the specifications, but determining statistical control and capability indexes from these samples doesn't quite make sense to me. Mainly because the sample we take is from a very large lot, and doesn't seem to be much different than if our customer were to sample our shipments, and try to determine if our process was in control or not.
My primary question I guess is: Are there better tools available for this type of analysis or maybe a better application of the control chart to determine statistical control. Any insight from anyone who has had similar experiences would be greatly appeciated.

IP: Logged

Don Winton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 498
From:Tullahoma, TN
Registered:

posted 15 July 1999 01:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Don Winton   Click Here to Email Don Winton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The problem and frustrations you are experiencing are to be expected. You are monitoring the outputs to try to control the inputs. This will not work. The answers you seek may be beyond the capability of the control chart. You may require advanced statistical techniques.

quote:
The problem arises when variations in material chemistry, quench rate, etc. cause these dimensions to both "grow" and "shrink" in sometimes significant amounts.

It appears that you have several variables, but concentrate on three for now. One, article temperature. Two, quench temperature. Three, quench time. I believe that you will find that, if these three are looked at first, variation in material may not be significant. Perhaps not.

What you need is someone who can set up a designed experiment that considers these three variables first (after that, look at the material). Once you have determined how these variables affect your dimensions, then process control techniques can be utilized to control the inputs.

Alternatively, put controls on the three variables I mentioned above. Control article temperature to 'X' degrees, +/- range. Control quench temperature to 'X' degrees +/- range. Same for quench time. Place controls on these and use control charts for these inputs.

Drawing on my limited past experience, these controls may go something like this:

Place article in oven at 'X' degrees for one hour +/- 10 minutes. Remove articles and place in {Type of here. Oil, water, etc.} quench of 'X' degrees +/- 5 degrees. Leave articles in quench for 5 minutes +/- 1 minute.

I believe you will find that when you place controls on the inputs, the outputs will become more predictable. I would still advise the advanced statistical technique if you want to know the ideal inputs. I can help, if you like, but would need more details.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Don*** Dead Link Removed ***

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!