Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums! This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

 The New Elsmar Cove Forums The New Elsmar Cove Forums   Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma   Conflicting dimensions    profile | register | preferences | faq | search
 Author Topic:   Conflicting dimensions IsabergLurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 2From:SwedenRegistered: Sep 1999 posted 07 September 1999 02:42 PM                I work in the cable and wire industry and application of SPC seems to be somewhat hard. The automotive specs almost allways include requirements on minimum and average wall thickness plus minimum and maximum diameter of the insulation. The specs are not written by engineers taking into regard the fantastic possibility of SPC and Cpk's above 1.33 for all dimensions. According to my experience I have not yet seen a spec where these four dimensional requirements have not been conflicting with eachother, i.e when diameter can be held at Cpk > 1,33 either min or av wall thickness will be < 1.33. To satisfy the customer and mostly the assesor we have choosen diameter to be a characteristic to study. I would like to know if anyone else have any good solutions on this problem? Please don't tell me to discuss it with the responsible engineer writing the specs cause they just won't listen.IsabergIP: Logged Don WintonForum Contributor Posts: 498From:Tullahoma, TNRegistered: posted 03 October 1999 11:32 AM                To satisfy the customer and mostly the assessor we have chosen diameter to be a characteristic to study.As long as the customer is satisfied, you may be OK.I would like to know if anyone else have any good solutions on this problem?I do not personally, but I may suggest something. Typically, you would choose, from among the available variables, key input variable(s). For example, if you identify wire diameter as key and wall thickness as secondary to the key variable, identify diameter as Cpk >1.33 while wall thickness as Cpk >1.00 (or whatever). The inverse could also be true.Typically, when conflicting dimensions exist, it is better to grade the requirements against criticality.Regards,Don------------------Just the ramblings of an Old Wizard Warrior.Check Out dWizard's Lair: *** Dead Link Removed *** IP: Logged
 All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) next newest topic | next oldest topic Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic Hop to: Select a Forum or Archive List of Forums: Category: General Quality Topics --------------------Measurement, Test and CalibrationStatistical Techniques and 6 SigmaDocumentationNonconformance and Corrective Action SystemsContinuous ImprovementBenchmarkingTPM - Total Productive MaintenanceBaldrige National Quality AwardTQM - Total Quality ManagementMiscellaneous Quality TopicsBook ReviewsQuality Assurance SoftwareOccupations in Quality Assurance Category: National & International Standards --------------------ISO 9001/4:2000ISO 9000:1994ISO 14001 And Other Environmental SpecsGeneral ISO TopicsBS8800 & OHSAS 18001FDA and Medical DevicesAS 9100TL 9000 Category: Auditing and Registrars --------------------AuditingRegistrars and Registration Category: Automotive Related --------------------TS 16949QS-9000Tooling and Equipment SuppliersForo en Espa–olAPQP and PPAPFMEA and Control PlansEmbedded Devices and Control SoftwareVDA Volumes Including 6.1 Category: Guide Buyers Forums --------------------Guide Pre-Purchase QuestionsGuide Post-Purchase Questions Category: Software Quality Assurance --------------------Linux InfoTickit Scheme ForumSoftware Quality AssuranceInternet History Category: Odds and Ends --------------------Used - Buy and SellForums - How Do They Work? Suggestions!Company Advertisements - Free Offers, etc. List of Archives: PoliticsJokes