The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Capability Stuff

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Capability Stuff
Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 23 November 1999 12:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Subject: Inspection Criteria RE1
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 09:20:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Greg Gogates iso25@fasor.com
To: iso25@quality.org

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:04:58 +0200
From: "Frans J.C. Martins" fjcm@icon.co.za
To: Greg Gogates
Subject: Re: Inspection Criteria

Dear Group,

SNIP
> The most common use in the US seems to be if the uncertainty (k=something,
> usually 2) is less than some fraction of the tolerance, commonly 25% (10%
> traditionally, 25% in Z540, 33% in ISO 10012, ...) then the tolerance is used
> as stated. This corresponds to the ISO 14253 standard used with k=0. I admit
> that using the expanded uncertainty with k=0 doesn't make sense at first (at
> least it didn't to me when Ralph Veale explained to me how k=0 would be a good
> idea), but in the language of ISO 14253 it is actually a sensible description
> of current US practice.
SNIP

I believe that the 33% limit is obtained by assuming the upper and lower spec limit to be 3 sigma. If we relate this back to SPC practically:

Specification: 100 ± 1

the ± 1 is assumed a three sigma value and the 100 as the mean, now.........

ZONE A (Stable zone) would be the mean ± 1 sigma thus 100 ± 0.333

ZONE B (Warning zone) would be the mean ± 2 sigma thus ± 100 ± 0.667

ZONE C (Action zone) would be the mean ± 3 sigma thus 100 ± 1

This theory then also traces back to the Process capability indices
calculation which are given by Relative capability or Process capability

Cp = USL - USL / 6 sigma NOTE: to manufacture within specifications the distance between the USL (upper specification limit) and the LSL (lower specification limit) must be less than the width of the base of the normal distribution thus the distance between -3 sigma and + 3 sigma) If Cp is < 1, the process is not capable

Cp = 1, the process is marginally capable
Cp > 1, it indicates a potential for higher capability

and

Capability index
Cpk = the lesser of: USL - mean / 3 sigma or mean - LSL / 3 sigma
If Cpk < 1, the process is incapable
Cpk = 1, still some undetected non-conforming output
Cpk > 1 but < 2, still some non-conforming output but with a good chance of
detection
Cpk > 2, total confidence in the process.

I trust that this helps and makes some sense.

Regards in Quality
Frans J.C. Martins
South Africa

IP: Logged

Don Winton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 498
From:Tullahoma, TN
Registered:

posted 23 November 1999 09:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Don Winton   Click Here to Email Don Winton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good Post. I agree.

Regards,
Don

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!