The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Multi-Cavity Capability Studies

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Multi-Cavity Capability Studies
Jason Cartwright
unregistered
posted 17 April 2000 06:11 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We are a first and second tier supplier of Automotive Components, with the majority of of parts being produced by injection moulding. Historically, we have carried out capability studies on each cavity of multi- cavity tools. Due to some tools having in excess of 24 cavities, this results in a time consuming exercise, and 24 seperate cpk values. We are led to believe that it is more relevant to conduct a study taking random samples from all cavities, resulting in one cpk value. Does this represent an acceptable method of achieving process capability for multi-cavity tools?

IP: Logged

Batman
Forum Contributor

Posts: 111
From:Kane, PA 16735
Registered:

posted 18 April 2000 11:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Batman   Click Here to Email Batman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, a random sample should be a good method of determining process capability. However, theoretically you have 24 little distributions inside that random sample distribution.

Basically two items are of concern - what does your customer want and what is important to you. I know most automotive customers want individual by-cavity Cpk calculations and an overall calculation of all cavities combined. If during PPAP you determine that the variation between cavities is not significant then your SPC or other data collection could be from random samples.

Most of what I have seen in multi-cavity tooling is that there is always some cavities that are statistically different. Sometimes it matters and sometimes it does not.

Definitly check with your customer, though.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!