The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Reduction of Capable SPC Charts

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Reduction of Capable SPC Charts
Daniel J. Rupright
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 9
From:Defiance, Ohio USA
Registered: May 2000

posted 16 October 2000 04:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Daniel J. Rupright   Click Here to Email Daniel J. Rupright     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I work in the quality department for a mid to large company. We have plants in Ohio, South Carolina, Arkansas, and recently Pennsylania. In our Ohio plant's SPC department, we have over 1,171 active floor charts. Some have CPK's over 20. Is a guideline for reduction? Our customers' SPC dimensions would still be monitored on our inspection instruction cards done hourly. Does anybody know how to beat this paperwork monster?

------------------
Daniel J. Rupright
Defiance Metal Products
Defiance, Ohio 43512

IP: Logged

Roger Eastin
Forum Wizard

Posts: 345
From:Greenville, SC
Registered:

posted 17 October 2000 08:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Roger Eastin   Click Here to Email Roger Eastin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Are all these SPC charts required by your customer(s)? I think you can stop, IMHO, doing SPC charts on Cpk's as large as 20 (unless required by your customer). You're trying to swat a gnat with a sludge hammer! Use your money somewhere else. You need to look at your strategy for doing control charts. I would only do them on your worst processes for now (e.g.,Cpk<1.33) and save some trees by not doing all the rest. You may want to audit processes where you consider the cost of nonconforming product too high (internal/external repair costs, etc.), but save your money for those areas that really need it.

IP: Logged

Al Dyer
Forum Wizard

Posts: 622
From:Lapeer, MI USA
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 10 November 2000 07:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Al Dyer   Click Here to Email Al Dyer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Boy, what a logistical nightmare!

I'd like to add this thought:

If your Cpk's are that high, is there a possibility that you can review your control plans (customer involvement) with the thought of reducing your costs and passing SOME of that savings to the customer?

Kill two birds with one stone.

ASD...

------------------
Al Dyer
Mngt. Rep.
ullysses3@excite.com

IP: Logged

Tommy VanHorne
unregistered
posted 16 January 2001 08:30 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You mention high Cpk's. Do you have any quality cost data (i.e. internal or external rejections) that support the supposition that "meeting specificaton equates with low rejections".

IP: Logged

Al Dyer
Forum Wizard

Posts: 622
From:Lapeer, MI USA
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 16 January 2001 08:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Al Dyer   Click Here to Email Al Dyer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To whom is this question addressed?

IP: Logged

bagpuss
unregistered
posted 22 February 2001 06:48 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We are in a similar situation, 1000+ charts in the shop. Currently trying to take SPC off all CPK>10 (for a start!). Have you thiught of gauging the critical dimensions instead, customers tend to go for it if you can prove capability.

In the past we have conducted ppk on several dimensions, even if they are not high lighted as critical. Take the lowest and monitor for a while.

As mentioned above, why waste time and money on very little.

IP: Logged

Nihilo
unregistered
posted 29 March 2001 10:32 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For processes with Cpks that high, is it possible to economize, to cut back on materials, or save time by purposefully and controllably reducing Cpk? DOE comes to mind as a tool, but at >20, you could probably achieve a lot by simple one-factor experiments.

The other thing; is automation feasible? That's a surefire way to eliminate SPC charts.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!