The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Capability Studies

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Capability Studies
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 2
From:Augusta, GA, USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 07 December 2000 10:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for JMitchell   Click Here to Email JMitchell     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How should the sample size for a capability study be determined? Do I need to use subgroups, or it sufficient to just measure 30 parts? Can I get any usable data about a process capability by measuring each part in a short run of say 50 parts?

Thanks in advance for your help.

IP: Logged

Rick Goodson
Forum Wizard

Posts: 102
From:Wuakesha, Wisconsin, USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 07 December 2000 12:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Goodson   Click Here to Email Rick Goodson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If you are doing this for an automotive customer, you should use the AIAG SPC book for guidance. It will save you a lot of problems dealing with your customer. Never the less, on to your question.

You do need to use subgroups. The reason is to long and complicated to explain here. If you want further info get a hold of Grant & Leavenworth's Statistical Quality Control, ISBN 0-07-844354-7 and read chapters three and four on why control charts work.

The subgroup size should be at least 4. At a size of 4 and even with a universe (read process) that is far from normal, the distribution of the average of the samples will be very close to normal. The number of subgroups should be at least 25. Again, there is a statisical basis for this number in Grant and Leavenworth. The frequency between subgroups needs to be sufficient for variation between subgroups based on common cause to take place. Rule of thumb. Spread the subgroups out over 1000 pieces or over one shift, which ever is fewer or smaller.

Hope this helps.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!