The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line

The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove ForumsThe Elsmar Cove Forums
  Statistical Techniques and 6 Sigma
  Cpk value interpretation

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Cpk value interpretation
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
Registered: May 2001

posted 08 July 2001 05:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for raghuraman   Click Here to Email raghuraman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
can somebody educate me how to interpret this.

I got a Cp value of 1.00 and a Cpk of 0.9. But all the X bar values are within UCL and LCL. Does this mean that the process is under control. If so, what is the significance of Cpk value of 1.33

IP: Logged

Al Dyer
Forum Wizard

Posts: 814
From:Lapeer, MI USA
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 08 July 2001 02:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Al Dyer   Click Here to Email Al Dyer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Cp = Rating of spec limit usage
Cpk = Rating of process centering

Even if all Xbar values are within the control limits one of the individuals in the samle size could be out of the control limit.

Therefore beacause the Xbars are within limits does not always mean the process is in control.

You have to ensure that the process is stable by removing special causes and ensure there are no runs or trends.

In the case of inherent causes you need to identify them and control depending upon what your specs or customer requirements are. A type of inherent cause would be tool wear.

From the limited data you provided, my guess is you are not in control because the values you provided lead me to Guess that your range is unstable which means a higher sigma and lower Cp/Cpk readings.

Any help from someone more experienced in the process?


IP: Logged

Rick Goodson
Forum Wizard

Posts: 135
From:Wuakesha, Wisconsin, USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 09 July 2001 09:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Goodson   Click Here to Email Rick Goodson     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Your logic is right on target IMHO. Cp does not take into account the process centering. Once you look at Cpk you have to consider the process centering and the process can be out of control. The fact that the X-bars are within limits does not speak to individual x's or to the overall spread of the subgroups. I suspect, as you do, that the range chart, or sigma chart as the case may be, is not in control.


With regard to CPK of 1.33, that is an arbitrary value that basically allows the process some wiggle room with in the specification limits while still being in control. As the CPK goes up the wiggle room gets greater. Keep in mind that process variation and process centering are two separate process characteristics that are conveniently measured together by Cpk. They should be understood separately from each other. Remember, the process does not know what the specifications are. The process can be statistical control and capable or not capable depending on how we arbritrarily set the specification.


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Marc Smith | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Please Visit the new Elsmar Cove Forums! All these threads are there and much more!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!