The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  Tooling and Equipment Suppliers

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Inspection
Dan De Yarman
Forum Contributor

Posts: 67
From:Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
Registered: Aug 1999

posted 27 January 2000 04:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dan De Yarman   Click Here to Email Dan De Yarman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is it acceptable to use a checklist for inspection of machined parts coming from subcontractors? The checklist would have the job number, part number, quantity, date, and revision level. The revision level would be that of the drawing, to which the detail was inspected against.

I don't think we would receive very many inspection records from our subcontractors. Many of them don't have the resources needed to have someone fill out inspection reports; although we do have one that does it already on their own. That is why I am asking if this is acceptable.

Another possibility might be for us to have a standard inspection form and send it out with the work. That way all the subcontractor has to do is fill out the form and send it back with the finished part.

What does everybody think? I would much prefer to go with the first one (lack of storage for the inspections records otherwise).


IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA

posted 28 January 2000 10:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't see a problem with a check list approach. the question is where the items on the check list come from.

Remember, you decide what, if any, inspections and tests have to be made. They can be extensive (product for space shuttle) or minimal (visual of injection molded toy soldiers).

IP: Logged

Tom Goetzinger
Forum Contributor

Posts: 123
From:Milwaukee, WI USA
Registered: Mar 99

posted 28 January 2000 10:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tom Goetzinger   Click Here to Email Tom Goetzinger     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Are you performing incoming inspection on the parts? If so, your inspection records should provide all the information you need.
If you are not performing incoming inspection, you may need to validate that you are getting good parts from your suppliers. This can be done by certifying your suppliers.
Another approach might be to objectively prove that you have historically been getting good parts (no evidence of extra cost or late delivery due to poor purchased part quality) and have a method in place to catch if that changes, so that you can "nip the problem in the bud" so to speak.
This will be harder to sell to your auditor, but if the evidence is there, they should accept it.
Remember in everything you do, if it honestly doesn't make good business sense for your business, do you really have to do it; can you provide evidence that you are not aversly affecting your customers by not doing it? If you can, document the fact that you are not, and go on.
Of course, as always, this is IMHO only.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!