The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  FMEA and Control Plans
  APQP Control Plans

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   APQP Control Plans
Tom Avrutik
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 3
From:
Registered: Oct 98

posted 29 January 1999 12:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tom Avrutik   Click Here to Email Tom Avrutik     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We are a tier 2 supplier working on QS registration. In the past, we have prepared control plans for several of our customers per their formats. These plans listed every inspection and check done in the process.

For QS, it seems we would have to perform MSA studies for everything listed on the plan. This would be almost impossible to administer, so I have a question or two:

1. Per the APQP manual, it looks like we would list all of the process steps, but only HAVE to inlcude specifications, evaluation etc (items 22-26) for the Special Characteristics. Is it generally acceptable to do this, and leave items 22-26 blank on the plan for the other steps?

2. It has been suggested we could have "2 plans"... a "PPAP control plan" and a more detailed, manufacturing plan for internal use only. The PPAP plan would only show the special characteristics and would be submitted to the customer, but we could have the internal plan with all our actual inspection steps. Would this help us avoid the MSA requirements on everything we do?

Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated.

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 22 March 1999 07:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
For QS, it seems we would have to perform MSA studies for everything listed on the plan.
For every critical characteristic on the control plan. So - it depends upon the content of your control plan.
quote:
1. Per the APQP manual, it looks like we would list all of the process steps, but only HAVE to inlcude specifications, evaluation etc (items 22-26) for the Special Characteristics. Is it generally acceptable to
do this, and leave items 22-26 blank on the plan for the other steps?
I have never seen them left out. To be honest I never really thought about leaving them out. Some companies use the control plan only for critical characteristics (and safety) but QS has more and more people bringing in the other process steps where once their controls were part of processing documents. Sorry I dopn't know the answer to this one. I need to 'recalibrate' myself in this area.
quote:
2. It has been suggested we could have "2 plans"... a "PPAP control plan" and a more detailed, manufacturing plan for internal use only. The PPAP plan would only show the special characteristics and would be submitted to the customer, but we could have the internal plan with all our actual inspection steps. Would this help us avoid the MSA requirements on everything we do?
This is my paradigm - and the answer is Yes.

Sorry to be so late with the response. Sometimes I 'lose' messages for a short period...

IP: Logged

Batman
Forum Contributor

Posts: 111
From:Kane, PA 16735
Registered:

posted 22 March 1999 10:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Batman   Click Here to Email Batman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just a couple of things to also consider. You may have identified your own "Special Characteristics" or "Key Characteristics" in your manufacturing process, and these should be addressed in your control plans.

If having two control plans works for you, good. If you are subject to a "Run At Rate" study by your customer, they will bring with them the most recently submitted PPAP information and go through the process with you. There may be some confusion on their part if they have a neat, concise control plan that you submitted, and then see the "real" stuff at the production site. I try not to have opportunities to confuse the customer.

About leaving blanks, we have had two findings in the PPAP section ( at two different times ) for leaving blanks on the PSW. This is not the control plan, but just a cautionary note.

We only put those process steps that involve "Key Characteristics" on the control plan, any steps in between are just not listed, although they are found on the flow diagram. Key characteristics need to have some indication of "control," however you define it. That way you can fill in the measurement system stuff and the control method stuff.

Probably most important, make it work for you, and be ready to defend it.

Just a couple of things to consider.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!