|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() ISO 9001/4:2000
![]() ISO Registration for Start-up Company - So Many Questions...
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: ISO Registration for Start-up Company - So Many Questions... |
|
Alison Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 1 |
I am working for a manufacturing start-up company that is scheduled to begin full production in January 2001. At the present time, we are in the midst of implementing an ERP system (including a QM module) and establishing our working policies and procedures. Although we have a lot on the go at the moment, I belive that now is the time to be begin our ISO work so we can keep our quality policy/objectives in mind as we move forward. I am in the process of developing an ISO project plan so that we can get started asap. My project plan tentatively looks like this: Questions: - does anyone have any feedback re: this project plan? does is look reasonable? are there any obvious holes in it? So many questions... any help/advice you can offer would be appreciated. Thanks. IP: Logged |
|
David Mullins Forum Contributor Posts: 248 |
If you would like a sample project plan, Work Breakdown Structure, 9001:2000 (DIS) gap analysis and sample implementation status checklist (9002:1994) then e-mail me. [email protected] Your questions suggest you'd better buy a copy of the standard. There is no fixed format or (dare I say it at this forum) interpretation. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
rrramirez Forum Contributor Posts: 23 |
Your approach is quite correct. IMO you may: 1) Implement the system (documentation, training, process control, etc.) and after a period of time conduct the gap analysis. 3)Implement the corrective actions, if there is any. 2)Write the quality manual after everything in the system is rigth. 3)Contact the registrar. I participated in similar case in a methanol plant in Venezuela.
------------------ IP: Logged |
|
rrramirez Forum Contributor Posts: 23 |
Your approach is quite correct. IMO you may: 1) Implement the system (documentation, training, process control, etc.) and after a period of time conduct the gap analysis. 3)Implement the corrective actions, if there is any. 2)Write the quality manual after everything in the system is rigth. If you need a format for your quality manual I can supply one to you. 3)Contact the registrar. The Changes made in the ISO/FDIS 9001:2000:Numbers of the elements: Quality Manual (5.5.5), Document Control (5.5.6) and Control of Records (5.5.7) under Section 5, are now under the General Documents Requirements under 4.2.2, 4.2.3 and 4.2.4, respectively. The Section 5.5 was renamed as RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION. I participated in similar case in a methanol plant in Venezuela.
------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Jim Triller Forum Contributor Posts: 26 |
Alison, I recommend taking a slightly different approach. I think it would be beneficial to select a registrar earlier in the process. Registrars have somewhat different philosophies and interpretations of the standard. Better registrars offer "help desks" as a way to communicate to their (potential) clients their specific interpretations of the clauses. This can be extremely benefical in the development of your system. Next, consider reading ISO 9004-1 (available from ASQ), specifically section 6 - "Financial Considerations of Quality Systems." Typically, from my experience, companies treat obtaining registration as a "project" not as an operational business model. Unfourtunately, companies that do so rarely experience quality improvement as much as they could (again, my opinion based on experience). Tour some registered companies and learn first hand from other folk's experience. A good question to ask "management reps" is what would you do differently and why as well as what works well? People who have been in your position usually have some interesting stories to tell as well as valuable experience to share. Have management establish the quality policy early. Apply metrics (performance measurements) to the quality policy. Management should use these metrics as leading operational indicators. This should be what drives your company's quality program. Lastly, keep your system simple, easy to maintain and comply with, and defined in a way that makes sense for what your organization does. Best of luck....Jim ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
