|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 ISO 9001/4:2000
 Auditing
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Auditing |
|
Russ Forum Contributor Posts: 17 |
posted 04 May 2001 02:39 PM
   
I have just taken the Lead Auditor course, and was told that the MR shouldn't be doing internal audits because he/she can't be truly objective. What is everyone's thoughts on this? This has been common practice here where I am the MR, yet I see where our instructor was coming from. I also issue all NCR's to the areas after an internal audit, and screen the corrective action when they are returned. How is everyone else doing this? I thought we were doing good! IP: Logged |
|
DICKIE Forum Contributor Posts: 46 |
posted 04 May 2001 02:48 PM
Our MR does about half of the internal audits, the other half done by the other 3 people we have trained. Prior to our registration the MR did all the internal audits and it was not a problem with our auditor. After registration we thought it would be a good idea to spread the fun around. Greg IP: Logged |
|
goose Forum Contributor Posts: 17 |
posted 04 May 2001 03:10 PM
We audit in teams of 2 people, 6 teams. Audits are scheduled by a QE who is audit coordinator. Mgt Rep. is member of a team but coordinator takes care to schedule Rep's team in area where there is total independence. Coordinator reports audit status to Rep who inturn reports to Mgt. IP: Logged |
|
Al Dyer Forum Wizard Posts: 622 |
posted 04 May 2001 03:21 PM
Just went through a session of selecting a registrar and the question of whether the MR can also be the Lead Internal Auditor was part of our decision process. In all cases we had a representative from the registrar and the potential auditor. They all unanimously said that, yes, the MR can be the LIA as long as they do not audit areas that they are responsible for. In my situation that means that I cannot audit 4.1 management responsibility, 4.5 document control, and 4.17 internal audit. We do have an internal audit team that would audit the areas that I could not, although it is still my responsibility to produce and report the audit results to management and issue corrective actions. Along with this responsibility I also realize that I must ensure that my areas of responsibility are conforming to standards and requirements. If not, there would be no credibility to my position. It comes down to personal and corporate integrity. Would you mind posting the name of your lead auditr trainer? All companies are continually striving to reduce costs and the cost of having a full time internal auditor can be prohibitive to small and medium sized companies. We all wear many hats and reputible registrars and auditors realize this. Hell, most of the lead auditors probably started out as managements reps and internal auditors! ASD... IP: Logged |
|
Dan Larsen Forum Contributor Posts: 137 |
posted 04 May 2001 03:32 PM
Like Al, I don't see an issue with having the MR handle audits. In fact, based on the defined responsibilities for the MR within the standard, I tend to think this is logical. Of course, integrity could be an issue but that's where the registrar comes in. Now, the MR shouldn't audit areas of direct responsibility (4.17 is the most obvious). Use an alternative lead auditor for those areas. Better yet, have the President coordinate and review those audits...after all it's his/her system and the MR works for him/her! IP: Logged |
|
eskay Forum Contributor Posts: 21 |
posted 06 May 2001 10:54 AM
I don't see any problem in MR conducting the internal audits. I myself being a MR for our group of companies, I almost audit all the areas (except ofcourse 4.1, 4.5 & 4.17). And this has never been a issue with the Registrars. Audit of 4.1, 4.5 & 4.17 was done by other qualified internal auditors who were independent within our company. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
rock Forum Contributor Posts: 11 |
posted 07 May 2001 09:17 AM
Russ, In 8.2.2 of the 2000 edition states "Auditors shall not audit their own work." You should be OK unless you have a lot of overlap at your company. Mike IP: Logged |
|
Fire Girl Forum Contributor Posts: 41 |
posted 07 May 2001 10:16 AM
Russ I just had this very discussion with my registar at our last audit. He told me I was not to be auditing areas I was responsible for. I do co-ordinate the Internal Auditing but I stll felt I should be auditing Internal Auditing. I felt that it was a good way for me to check up on my Internal Auditors and how they were doing. He disagreed. So then end result.... I can't audit any areas I am responsible for. :confused IP: Logged |
|
energy Forum Contributor Posts: 228 |
posted 07 May 2001 11:36 AM
Russ, Most of our written procedures contain signatures by Quality Assurance. Either as the originator or the authorizer. A case could be made that I can't audit any of those procedures. We'll argue that when the time comes. I would stay away from those areas mentioned in the previous postings. As MR all audit findings get reported to Top Management for review and disposition, so there is no conflict of interest there. As far as auditor courses go, and I've been to a few, there are differing opinions between instructors on a number of topics. I treat the disparities as opinions and concentrate on the nuts and bolts of auditing. energy IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
