The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  ISO 9001/4:2000
  Correpsondance between ISO 9K:2K and 1994 Standard

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Correpsondance between ISO 9K:2K and 1994 Standard
Fire Girl
Forum Contributor

Posts: 41
From:Orillia, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 11 June 2001 01:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fire Girl   Click Here to Email Fire Girl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's a question.

At the back of my copy of the ISO 9K:2K standard there is a table labeled 'Annex B, Correspondance Between ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:1994'. Is this complete? If so which way? What I mean is are all the elements from one standard or the other covered? Is there obsolete stuff from 1994?

I don't think I'm making myself very clear, but I hope somebody understands me!


IP: Logged

Forum Contributor

Posts: 228
From:New Britain, CT
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 11 June 2001 01:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for energy   Click Here to Email energy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Fire Girl,
There you are! If you look at Table B.2 you will see some blank areas opposite the 1994 references. That's new stuff. Conversely, in table B.1 opposite the new standard, if there are blank spaces, it means (to me) that's new stuff or something different. Also, see the "informative" in parenthesis? Watch out, because that means that those tables are not meant to be all inclusive.
How's it going "little buddy"? I keep trying. And I'm not paranoid. It's just that everybody's after me.

energy (paranoia reigns)

[This message has been edited by energy (edited 11 June 2001).]

[This message has been edited by energy (edited 11 June 2001).]

IP: Logged

E Wall
Forum Contributor

Posts: 45
From:Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Jun 2001

posted 12 June 2001 05:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for E Wall   Click Here to Email E Wall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Something that might help -
What I did a long time ago was identify my documents (using a db I developed) by what ISO element they related. This helped because our internal audit format was by element and thus I could quickly print up a list of associated documents for our auditors to references for their sampling.

I took the 2000 rev & did the same using the matrix provided (just added spaces for extra fields in the db). The documents will still need to be reveiwed for applicability since some things are split into multiple clauses, but shouldn't be too difficult - then I'll clean them up and have ready lists for int aud by new clauses.

By the way, due to our # system, the dept is already identified, so doing process reviews is quick and simple as well.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!