|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums 
|
|
|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 Topic Closed
|
 The New Elsmar Cove Forums
 TS 16949
 ISO16949 V. QS9000
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: ISO16949 V. QS9000 |
|
ALM Forum Contributor Posts: 80 |
posted 16 June 1999 12:19 PM
   
I have seen a previous thread on this topic but it was from April and I want to keep it fresh. My company is upgrading from ISO9002 to QS9000, expected success in the fall of '99. Something came up on a recent visit to a Delphi plant (to whom we primarily supply) and it was put to me like this... Why are you going for QS9000 now, it is going to be REPLACED by ISO16949? He used the word "replaced" though, in the confusion that surrounds just about everything with the Auto Standards, I wouldn't be surprised if he were overstating things a bit. Can anyone provide an update on information regarding ISO16949? As "current" as I believe that I keep myself on such issues, this came out of left field for me and I know nothing. My info came from Delphi. Anyone have any feedback from GM, Chrysler, or Ford? Thanks in advance. ALM IP: Logged |
|
admin Cheech Wizard Posts: 46 |
posted 18 June 1999 10:33 AM
There's a TR16949 forum here - there are a few threads there. One said TR16949 will not be released until 2002 or there about. IP: Logged |
|
Lassitude Forum Contributor Posts: 89 |
posted 14 July 1999 03:45 AM
I think the most recent thread is: https://elsmar.com/ubb/Forum16/HTML/000002.html IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
Main Site Search 
