The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

Wooden Line
This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

Owl Line
The New Elsmar Cove Forums   The New Elsmar Cove Forums
  ISO 9000:1994
  Cl. 4.15 Limited Shelf Life materials

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Cl. 4.15 Limited Shelf Life materials
RRamamurthy
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
From:Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Registered: Dec 98

posted 11 December 1998 09:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for RRamamurthy   Click Here to Email RRamamurthy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We face difficulties in specifying the Shelf-life period of materials subject to deterioration in time upon storage.

1. Manufacturers or their agents do not always help by providing this information even after requests.
2. Even when it is provided it is not not always unequivocal and straight.
3. It is not always always verifyable from published sources.

Can anybody help by suggesting any public source from where one can easily obtain this inforamtion in a collated form - like a handbook? Is this info available in the Net?

------------------
Ram
Bangalore, India

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 12 December 1998 10:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
--> ...1. Manufacturers or their agents do not always help by
--> providing this information even after requests.

If a manufacturer does not specify shelf life, I assume there is none (or it is good for at least a year at room temperature and 'nominal' humidity).

--> 2. Even when
--> it is provided it is not not always unequivocal and straight.

I would have to see an example to see the verbiage they use. If it is verbal and not part of the 'product specification', then I would not consider it as significant anyway.

--> 3. It is not always always verifyable from published sources.

I would think that a designed validation test would / could provide the information but you will have to post an example of the product we are talking about.

I know of no 'One Source' to go to for such information. I always go directly to the manufacturer. If they can't give the information I need, I would contact purchasing and seek a more responsible source for the material. If your suppliers are playing games with you, you could end up with a lot of problems in the future.

IP: Logged

Leslie Garon
Forum Contributor

Posts: 27
From:Chicago'ish, IL, USA
Registered: Oct 98

posted 16 December 1998 01:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leslie Garon   Click Here to Email Leslie Garon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ram,

I am in agreement with Marc, but here's another avenue you could take:

Go to your engineers to define longevity of solvents, adhesives etc..... that the manufacturer hasn't specified but your company has set requirements. They can put their druthers (preferences) on the print. Now you have documentation.

Another way is sloppy but would also work. make a list including the material name, expiration period and some sort of approval. this method works as long as the item has a date code (if missing, you need to put one on it).

Generally speaking, If the manufacturer doesn't recommend an expiration perios and neither do your engineers, then don't worry about it. this also goes for storage and safety conditions.

IP: Logged

Don Winton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 498
From:Tullahoma, TN
Registered:

posted 18 December 1998 02:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Don Winton   Click Here to Email Don Winton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am in aggreement with Leslie and Marc. If the manufacturer does not supply the information, supply it yourself and be sure it is "assessed at appropriate intervals."

Or, if "deterioration" is not a concern, state such and document.

Regards,
Don

IP: Logged

RRamamurthy
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
From:Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Registered: Dec 98

posted 03 January 1999 06:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for RRamamurthy   Click Here to Email RRamamurthy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As regards sample of manufacturer's recommendation, here is one:
"The shelf life is normally one year, so long as due care is taken in the storage of the material, as regards temperature, humidity and ventilation"!
And the manufacturer often does not give the date of manufacture, we only have the date of receipt of material in the store. We have no means of knowing whether the life is already expired!

As regards our engineers certifying the shelf life, this is not acceptable to the auditors, unless backed up by published sources. And I think, rightly so.

Ram

------------------
Ram
Bangalore, India

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 03 January 1999 08:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
As regards sample of manufacturer's recommendation, here is one:
"The shelf life is normally one year, so long as due care is taken in the storage of the material, as regards temperature, humidity and ventilation"!

This means if stored at 'room ambient temperature and humidity'. Typically this is like in the area of 60 degrees F to 85 degrees F and 30% to 80% humidity.

quote:
And the manufacturer often does not give the date of manufacture, we only have the date of receipt of material in the store. We have no means of knowing whether the life is already expired!

I'm going back to where purchasing has to work with suppliers to ensure this is evident. I mean, the bottom line is if they don't even provide information on when it was made you have a real problem.

quote:
As regards our engineers certifying the shelf life, this is not acceptable to the auditors, unless backed up by published sources. And I think, rightly so.

Umm, well, OK. But I can think of no published source which could give a shelf life for a company's product. You may be able to get some generalities, but hey - you have no idea what additives they may put in that is 'their special ingredient' - so, shelf life of comparable products or a class of products is, at best, a guess.

Make your suppliers get their shit together or find other suppliers.

Last comments:

You do identify materials when they are received and 'start' your shelf life from that point.

Run a report and be ready to show you have no nonconformances due to failure of a product which has been tracked to a root cause of expired shelf life. You may need evidence that this is not a problem.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 01-03-99).]

IP: Logged

RRamamurthy
Lurker (<10 Posts)

Posts: 4
From:Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Registered: Dec 98

posted 06 January 1999 11:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RRamamurthy   Click Here to Email RRamamurthy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"This means if stored at 'room ambient temperature and humidity'. Typically this is like in the area of 60 degrees F to 85 degrees F and 30% to 80% humidity."

Sir, that may be typical in the US. here in India, it may vary from 45 C to 10 C, with humiduty from 40% to as high as 100% !

And just throwing out recalcitrant supplier is not easy enough here, where we are still at a sellers' market stage in many products.

Do other readers have similar problems as mine as regards defining shelf life?

Can we not start building up a list of generic materials and their shelf life period under specified conditions?

Ram

------------------
Ram
Bangalore, India

IP: Logged

Don Winton
Forum Contributor

Posts: 498
From:Tullahoma, TN
Registered:

posted 09 January 1999 07:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Don Winton   Click Here to Email Don Winton     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
As regards our engineers certifying the shelf life, this is not acceptable to the auditors, unless backed up by published sources. And I think, rightly so

Am I the only one who has a problem with this? Cannot published sources be internal?

Regards,
Don

[This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 01-09-99).]

[This message has been edited by Don Winton (edited 01-09-99).]

IP: Logged

Marc Smith
Cheech Wizard

Posts: 4119
From:West Chester, OH, USA
Registered:

posted 09 January 1999 11:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Marc Smith   Click Here to Email Marc Smith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, Don, I do as well. I may not consider an internal document 'published' per se, but I would accept that.

BUT - I must admit I have not yet had a problem with shelf life issues. One client has material with a shelf life of 6 months designated by the manufacturer (adhesive) which that client keeps refrigerated and has extended the shelf life to about 1.5 years. They can show through warranty and other failure data that this is not a problem.

RRamamurthy wrote:

quote:
Sir, that may be typical in the US. here in India, it may vary from 45 C to 10 C, with humiduty from 40% to as high as 100%!

Most of my clients have materials storage indoors in a somewhat controlled environment (AC in summer, heat in winter). I have no idea what to tell you other than to talk with the quality manager of an ISO registered firm in India and see how they approached it.

You will, I predict, have to be quite aggressive here. If it was me, I would define every material which is time sensitive and write a document defining the company policy and directions for each. I would document the reason(s) for your 'classifications' and be ready to back that up with engineering, warranty and nonconformance data.

Obviously you are in an 'impossible' situation. I would get together with your registrar and go through the situation and your solution. Reality is reality. If they give you a problem and cite you (write a nonconformance) during an audit, appeal the write-up. There must be some other ISO registered companies in India which use time sensitive materials - find out which registrar one of them is using. And ask them how they handle their situation.

I'm sorry I personally cannot recommend anything else when:

quote:
...just throwing out recalcitrant supplier is not easy enough here, where we are still at a sellers' market stage in many products.

as I have not, with any of my clients, had a problem with shelf life. In fact, it is generally not an issue because material is typically used well before shelf life becomes an issue.

An example is a former client which used a special paint which had a shelf life of 4 months. They used the paint within 2 to 3 weeks of receipt so the only issue was ensuring Materials Management folks strictly followed their First-In-First-Out (FIFO) system and that Receiving folks adequately checked lot dates and such.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!


Main Site Search
Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear?
Powered by FreeBSD!Made With A Mac!Powered by Apache!