|
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
|
The New Elsmar Cove Forums
![]() ISO 9000:1994
![]() ISO 9001:2000 Committee Draft 2
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: ISO 9001:2000 Committee Draft 2 |
|
abagaria Lurker (<10 Posts) Posts: 1 |
We are in the process of implementing ISO 9001. I wish you can help me with the following questions. 1> Is the Committee Draft 2 of ISO 9001: 2000 available? Any suggestion, comment and assistance will be appreciated. Thank you, Ashish Bagaria IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Here are a few threads to check out: http://https://elsmar.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000001.html I haven't kept up with it, to be honest. I think we're still at draft 2. Any of you other folks know exactly what's happening with the standard? [This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 22 March 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
TheOtherMe Forum Contributor Posts: 64 |
For the latest info, go to: www.bsi.org.uk/iso-tc176-sc2 IP: Logged |
|
TheOtherMe Forum Contributor Posts: 64 |
Subject: ISO 9001:2000 approved!!!! Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 20:48:27 -0400 From: "ISO 9000:2000" To: "Discuss9000" Open Discussion of the Year 2000 Version of ISO 9000 ------------------------- Attention CD2 of ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 for the year 2000 have been approved for consideration as a draft international standard (DIS). However, a great deal of comments were submitted with the vote. This has resulted in a new proposal to be considered at the September 13th plenary meeting of the ISO/TC176/SC2 group. It has been proposed that the comments be reviewed by ISO/TC 176/SC2/WG 18, and the text of ISO/CD2 9004:2000 be revised by WG 18 to produce the DIS draft. That means that we now have to wait until mid-September to see if the DIS will be issued with significant adjustments to meet most of the criticisms submitted. Odds are now very high that the same requirements from CD2 will stay intact, but new language and structure may be introduced. Stay tuned. --------------------------------- This discussion moderated by the ISO 9000 Support Group at www.isogroup.simplenet.com. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
A 'base' FYI: --------snippo----- Subject: Q: ISO 9000 Emphasis /Farrugia From: "Francis E. Farrugia" Hi, Am I right to say that the original and subsequent revisions of the standard had/has as emphasis the following: 1987 - conformance to requirements FE. Farrugia IP: Logged |
|
barb butrym Forum Contributor Posts: 637 |
You can build your system to any standard you want as long as the intent of the current standard is met. So if you do ISO 9001.2000 make sure you have met all of 9001.1994 as well until the DIS is released/valid... IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
Yup - I feel (ah hemmm) somewhat ahead of the game in that I worked with a company which went thru regustration in June. The Q manual was to CD2. I just started a client which I am using the draft to 'guide'. But yes - ya dtill have to comply with the 1994 version. IP: Logged |
|
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 |
A couple of changes: -------- snippo ----------- Subject: Re: Req for comments on draft ISO 9001 /Hankwitz/Darracott/Marr From: Jeremy Marr Your concerns must have been expressed before as the new draft release of the standard - ISO/DIS 9001:2000 has addressed your concerns (some anyway). In part, the old and the new say - ISO/CD2 9001:2000 Now says (and even the title has changed): ISO/DIS 9001:2000 And as to the word continually: ISO/CD2 9001:2000 Now says (again with a change of title): ISO/DIS 9001:2000 Jeremy N. Marr IP: Logged |
All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
Hop to: |
Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!
