Training Records

The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums

Welcome to what was The Original Cayman Cove Forums!
This thread is carried over and continued in the Current Elsmar Cove Forums

Search the Elsmar Cove!

This is a "Frozen" Legacy Forum.
Most links on this page do NOT work.
Discussions since 2001 are HERE

The New Elsmar Cove Forums

ISO 9000:1994

Training Records

profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Author	Topic: Training Records
Marc Smith Cheech Wizard Posts: 4119 From:West Chester, OH, USA Registered:	posted 23 September 1999 06:59 PM quote: Subject: Training 4.18 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:04:48 -0700 From: "D., John" To: "'Marc'" At what point is training required to be documented? I am looking for a definition to eliminate the unnecessary from the required. As an example, we have a job that is set up by the lead person for an operator to do. We have control plans and work instructions in place and the operator is instructed in what is required. Now this may be the only time we do this particular job. Do we need to have a training record documented for this operator? Thank you for your patience. Train your operators how to follow your work instructions and ('as appropriate') control plan. Document that training. quote: and the operator is instructed in what is required. What are they 'instructed' to do beyond following the work instruction? Need more details. IP: Logged
Randy Forum Wizard Posts: 228 From:Barstow, CA, USA Registered: Jun 1999	posted 23 September 1999 10:50 PM I think,which is quite dangerous at times, that any time the initial process is changed or deviated from, that can effect the end product, you should go ahead and document the training for the change. Also, if a auditor asks for proof of the operators training on a specific piece of machinery, go to the OSHA safety training records for the individual. (I hope you have them. If not, start.) IP: Logged
Randy Forum Wizard Posts: 228 From:Barstow, CA, USA Registered: Jun 1999	posted 06 October 1999 04:24 PM I think (dangerous ground again) that if you have good personnel records, showing qualifications for specific machines by the operators, then they would only have to do the setup for new operations according to whatever specs. are required. You should then only have to document training on the new setup specification. Did I get that right? IP: Logged
barb butrym Forum Contributor Posts: 637 From:South Central Massachusetts Registered:	posted 08 October 1999 07:37 AM Training is pretty clear..... don't train a machinist how to mill a part, give him a spec to go by. don't train a nurse how to take a temp....give her 'hospital policy' on when its done and what form to fillout. You can even certify by verification of proficiency.... just document that verification....trouble with that is next time someone has to learn the job the trainer has to start from scratch. Sometimes its worth the effort to ensure consistency down the road. what ever works IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time (USA)	next newest topic \| next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Close Topic \| Archive/Move \| Delete Topic
	Hop to:

Contact Us | The Elsmar Cove Home Page

Your Input Into These Forums Is Appreciated! Thanks!

Main Site Search

Y'All Come Back Now, Ya Hear? Powered by FreeBSD!